Tweet
Everyone is clamoring for Muller's report. If I were the AG I would refuse to release it because there may be indictments based on the findings of illegal activity found during the investigation. You can't release to the public anything that may be used for a grand jury investigation fpr prosecution. Let the liberals and dems worry about that, because there is ample evidence already made public about the " dossier" and Obama's admin and what / when he knew, and Hil's Russian hacked server. The report, I'm sure can flesh that out.
-
-
Okay, but then if the House has to redo the entire investigation from scratch so that they can understand to their own satisfaction what happened, then no one should complain about it. Where is the bar these days set for House investigations? At Benghazi, obviously. So Trump and others should have no qualms about showing up like Hillary did for hours of grueling testimony.
Or, they could release the report and save everyone a lot of trouble.Last edited by togor; 03-26-2019, 11:53. -
If the report contains the alluded to illegal actions of Hillary, Comey, and the FBI participants, it becomes grand jury evidence and I can't remember the title of the law but it is paragraph 16 that says releasing the geand jury ingo is a felony. That applies to the libs that Comey used his friend to "leak" (felony). Hil's Russian hack of her illegal server (felony), and how many more are DOCUMENTED in the report, backed up with supporting documentation. I hope Trump directs the AG to sieze all documents before they are selectively combed. I wouldn't release until indictments have been filed.
Unless the people responsible are held to account, people wilp never have confidence in the govt judiciary.Comment
-
Your argument seems to be.... don't release it to anyone, just use it as a private roadmap to torment enemies of Trump. Again, OK, but Newton's Third Law of Motion directly applies to politics. When Trump attacks, and his supporters cheer, it's a sure sign that they want the war to continue, that they don't think things have gone on like this for long enough.Comment
-
Go nack and reread the last sentence of the first paragrah.Comment
-
Your last sentence is fine but also could be used as weasel words by some, as an excuse for not releasing the report. Weasel words are a thing.Comment
-
There's no weasel words there, and you know it.Comment
-
Not by you, but you don't have final say in whether the thing gets released or not. I predict it won't, and that there will be weasel words given as to why not. Both sides will actually conclude it is in their interest for us regular folks to not know what the hell really happened.Comment
-
The old national socialist ploy, "they didn't do it, but I think they want to or will do it, so they're guilty."Comment
-
Boy someone got some bad chili or something. You want to place a little wager on whether or not the full report gets officially released outside of the administration? The WH will see it for sure. I'll bet it doesn't go unredacted to Congress, and sure as heck not to the public. You want to take the opposite side of that wager? Put up or shut up, eh?
My reasoning for expecting the report to stay secret is simple: both side will fund raise better on disputed facts. All you have is babble about national socialists. Pathetic.Last edited by togor; 03-27-2019, 11:16.Comment
-
Then you should be specific about whom you direct your comments. A trait seen from many, all too often, on this forum.Comment
-
Did you note that beautiful lateral arabesque?Last edited by Vern Humphrey; 03-27-2019, 11:39.Comment
Comment