Trumps new idea.

[dryheat]

Move the illegals to sanctuary cities. I keep hoping I'll wake up and it's all a dream. The hollywood libs keep threatening to move to another country. I might have to as well; somewhere normal.

[togor]

Trump supporters like the idea of him pushing administrative and judicial boundaries to further ends sought by the base. Trump has first mover advantage here, but it's temporary. And what goes around will come around.

[JB White]

I like Trump's idea. Once they get them into a moving van they won't have to take them to any city.

[Allen]

Release them at the gates of the wall on the Mexico side. They will still be on U.S. property so it wouldn't be considered a deportation. They would have no place to go except "home".

[S.A. Boggs]

I really like the idea, overload the sanctuary system having to provide housing, food, clothing, transportation, medical care, education, employment. This will also detract from what is now being provided to those already there. Then will most certainly come the increase in crime...how delightful for them. Who knows, in a few months time a wall will be demanded by them for their protection. Trump should make it clear as long as the illegals stay in the sanctuary areas it is safe for them, roam outside and ICE will be waiting for them. Better yet, have the illegals sign a statement of immediate voluntary trip to the border of Mexico with a walk across.
Sam

[dryheat]

Since we're making up fantastic scenarios. How about rounding them up and shipping them to, oh let's say, somewhere like WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

[Allen]

While this would certainly shut up the democrats about their sanctuary cities. It would make matters worse because what happens in those cities will not stay in those cities no matter how many ICE agents are in force. Also, we would be giving up more U.S. property and then what happens down the road if a democrat or RINO should become president? The more dependents we have upon the taxpayers the closer we get to socialism/communism.

[S.A. Boggs]

This could work, not a perfect plan but better then the current situation. IF a voluntary agreement is signed if apprehended outside of sanctuary could be the kicker. The ugly alternative is more continuing to come in or worse is that people will take this situation into their own hands. I don't like the latter ideation, but in history it has come to reality.
Sam

[Allen]

No agreements, no laws will hold up for a minute. Decades ago perhaps they would. One thing we all learned from the obama years is that our laws now don't mean a damned thing.

That's why we have sanctuary cities in the first place: Because our laws were not honored. A place to multiply, fester and drain our economy all at taxpayer's expense and then they will ALL vote democrat as they already do.

[m1ashooter]

Anyone stop to thing that many already end up in sanctuary city's? I live in Houston and we are over run with them.

[togor]

Anyone stop to thing that many already end up in sanctuary city's? I live in Houston and we are over run with them.

I was thinking about that. Left to their own devices they go there anyways

[dryheat]

Phoenix isn't a Sanctuary city(which is kind of hard to believe) and big shiny buses dump them off by the hundreds weekly here. So it's all just a joke. Trump wants to nail the Big Three. NY CA and Chicago. But your herding cats. They kind of go where ever they feel like going. Although big cities are better places for immigrants so they might stay there a little. I guess I ought to find some little broke-dick town that even illegals don't want to move to.

[Allen]

Anyone stop to thing that many already end up in sanctuary city's? I live in Houston and we are over run with them.

That's my point. If any kind of laws or agreements were ever met in the past or present we wouldn't have sanctuary cites in the first place. These places should not exist.

There is no sanctuary from the law.

The only thing keeping them here is obama's judges. Most of whom belong in a sanctuary city themselves.

[togor]

No Allen, the laws are clear, which is why they're turned loose. But you don't want to the laws to change because it might mean compromise or one less thing to bitch about. So bitch away, for all the good it does.

[S.A. Boggs]

That's my point. If any kind of laws or agreements were ever met in the past or present we wouldn't have sanctuary cites in the first place. These places should not exist.

There is no sanctuary from the law.

The only thing keeping them here is obama's judges. Most of whom belong in a sanctuary city themselves.

From history, if government doesn't take care of a problem the people will. One can say that is illegal and it often is. This ideation is also reality and that is history regardless of any law. In many localities law enforcement is being curtailed due to lack of funds and increased cost to operate a department. One local department has had to cut two shifts per week due to cuts in budget. In a bordering state there is just the Sheriff and Chief Deputy for a large county, this is happening more and more.
Sam