Methinks they do protest too much

[dogtag]

Of course, democrats do little else other than complain.
So, where else would you send illegals other than places
where they would be safe - commonly known as Sanctuary
Cities, State in the case of California. Trump would have
to be an Ogre to send them where they were not wanted,
thereby putting them in danger. So what exactly is all the
fuss about ? Would I be a cynic if I thought this had nothing
to do with concern over the welfare of our less fortunate
friends from the South ?

[Sandpebble]

Well ... ya know... we were promised their entry would cease and desist almost imediately.... "Every thing is easy " said the Man...... and after that the "wall" would prevent the rest from entering... that's what won the vote.... right ?

Now we need a place to put all those that have entered over these past two years..... which by the way seems to be at record numbers regardless of the record number that have been prevented from entering.

Sounds a lot like the repeal and replace promise.... couldn't pull either off so it just has to be a Dems... or a Rinos ... fault .

Nothng was as easy as the Man promised

[togor]

Nothng was as easy as the Man promised

Doesn't matter. The man has attained folk hero status. The more he F's up, the more he is revered. He's in "unless caught in bed with a live girl or dead boy" territory with the base.

[Mike in NC]

Being caught with a dead homosexual gigolo who overdosed on drugs is more the domain of wealthy Democrat donors who seem to have this happen quite often.

Doesn't matter. The man has attained folk hero status. The more he F's up, the more he is revered. He's in "unless caught in bed with a live girl or dead boy" territory with the base.

[togor]

Being caught with a dead homosexual gigolo who overdosed on drugs is more the domain of wealthy Democrat donors who seem to have this happen quite often.

Yeah the one guy a couple of times and it's pretty effed up by general consensus.

[clintonhater]

The more he F's up, the more he is revered.

Though he's F'd up plenty, that's NOT the reason he's "revered." To the extent that he is, it's because he confronts the lying, sanctimonius, PC humbug preached to us unceasingly by the left-wing media to speak what everyone with their heads screwed on straight KNOWS is the truth; that, for ex., this country is FULL, at least with respect to disease-ridden (but fecund!) Turd World peasants. Unfortunately, he's still holding back from saying explicitly that the Dems are encouraging the Turd World invasion in the expectation of their future votes.

[togor]

You and I may have different definitions of F-ups, but we're on the same page here. Losing in court with a clearly illegal policy is a mistake in my book but a revered confrontation in yours. I'll make another prediction, which is that during the coming campaign he will be wackier than ever, if this is what is needed to keep the nation from tuning into his opponent's serious policy ideas. Fox and especially CNN will do their part to help him keep it a media cycle circus.

[k arga]

He's one hell'ev of a lot better than what we could have gotten.

[clintonhater]

Losing in court with a clearly illegal policy is a mistake in my book but a revered confrontation in yours.

"Clearly illegal" they are not, until the case is decided by the SC; meanwhile, they are the opinion of one of the hundreds of left-wing federal judges that Bush & Obama packed the federal courts with; like for ex., Roberts, such a fatuous idiot that he denies opinions of hard-core ideologues like Ginsberg can't be predicted with 100% certainty on EVERY issue. The federal court system is totally political!

[togor]

"Clearly illegal" they are not, until the case is decided by the SC; meanwhile, they are the opinion of one of the hundreds of left-wing federal judges that Bush & Obama packed the federal courts with; like for ex., Roberts, such a fatuous idiot that he denies opinions of hard-core ideologues like Ginsberg can't be predicted with 100% certainty on EVERY issue. The federal court system is totally political!

The predictable rant about judges you don't like aside, some readings of the law are plain, and the administration butts up against them specifically on the logic that even if they lose (in court) they win (in public relations points with the base). Hooking your constituents on one resentment after another is a proven tactic for winning the next election, but I'm trying to think of a great nation that was built on that tactic, and I'm coming up short. MAGA? Not that way. And speaking of hard core ideologues....you're not one?

[clintonhater]

And speaking of hard core ideologues....you're not one?

The crucial difference between myself & Ginsberg & her two fellow ideologue bitches, & all the other duplicitous leftwing judges whose phony legal "interpretations" of the law are as predictable as a compass needle, is that I don't deny it! I'm not that most contemptible & damnable of human beings, a HYPOCRITE!

[togor]

Why bitch about ideological extremists when you admit to being one yourself?

[clintonhater]

Why bitch about ideological extremists when you admit to being one yourself?

I explained why, but obviously deceit, duplicity, hypocrisy--as exemplified by judges cloaking their own PERSONAL political ideology with the sham of legal justifications--doesn't bother you any more than it does that platitudinous humbugger Roberts.

[togor]

So if they came clean, what? You'd tip your cap and respectfully disagree? Fat chance of that. Your excuse for everything is that someone else did it first. A thin excuse if ever there was one.