George Conway is correct .....

[Sandpebble]

George Conway's take on what "the investigation" was all about is correct ... what he said about it was clear, concise , and spot on .

[togor]

Yes he is. Never mind the shell game arguments that toggle between "a President can't be indicted" and "they didn't recommend indictment." For the White House to ignore Russian assaults on our voting infrastructure, and their disinformation campaigns, is a disgrace. That the loyalists can't rouse themselves to see it is, well, unsurprising. In the coming months we'll hear about voter fraud again and no one will say anything about the White House turning a blind eye to election hacking.

[clintonhater]

Never mind the shell game arguments that toggle between "a President can't be indicted" and "they didn't recommend indictment." For the White House to ignore Russian assaults on our voting infrastructure, and their disinformation campaigns, is a disgrace.

But a trivial one, compared to the unrelenting 24/7 disinformation campaign waged by the US media (with one exception) against conservative values. The Russians help, a tiny bit, level the playing field, though really, the very most they can do is a case of pissing into a hurricane.

[togor]

Voter system hacking is trivial? Are you sure you know what the word means?

[clintonhater]

Voter system hacking is trivial? Are you sure you know what the word means?

At least as well as you know what "disinformation" means.

[togor]

At least as well as you know what "disinformation" means.

I mean, c'mon, if Ivan gets into our voting databases, which have been left insecure by combinations of underqualified state workers and indifference by the IT consulting firms who are always chasing the next contract somewhere else, that has to be considered a big deal, right? I mean, how could it not, given the countless sermons we have endured about the evils of voter fraud and the need to make sure that voting roles are as pure as the undriven snow. Yeah, I know, you've pretty much given up on any idea of rule or law or the Constitution in this country, on the reasoning that liberals are winning so anything goes. I call BS on that. Trump was sworn in, wasn't he? If the game was as rigged as you (and he) said, then no way does that happen, especially with the razor thin margins in a few states.

[clintonhater]

Yeah, I know, you've pretty much given up on any idea of rule or law or the Constitution in this country, on the reasoning that liberals are winning so anything goes.

If anything goes & the libs are winning, it's because the main means for the dissemination of US news & public information is under the control of the unashamedly bigoted main-stream media, implacably resolved to destroy Trump's Presidency.

Speaking of "unashamedly bigoted," not one of the Big Three TV networks--which have devoted MASSIVE coverage, hundreds of hours, to the glorification of the Parkland (& other) anti-gunners--reported on their evening news programs the true events of the Brady-organized fiasco in Colorado, when the students "walked out" of this anti-gun event. I hope the Russians take up the slack.

[RED]

For the White House to ignore Russian assaults on our voting infrastructure

Yes. and they did all that when Obama was President and he didn't do squat about ir... because he was colluding with Vladimar Putin.

[togor]

Yes. and they did all that when Obama was President and he didn't do squat about ir... because he was colluding with Vladimar Putin.

Obama was weak on a bunch of stuff for sure.

CH: turning off the tube for a stretch might prove your spirits. If your day goes by what's on the screen, then you're not exactly a free man.