And it may be the beginning of the end of the game of of claims.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadkingtrax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 7835

    #46
    Originally posted by jcg&jmbfan
    Yes, the mention of a M1 was just another hijack of the thread. But as I said, the mention of a M1 on this whole site was eventful. Not sure why you are jumping on me though?
    He is jumping on you, because he expects you to comply with his instructions.

    I cant speak for others, but I've not argued in favor of anything that Sam, Vern, and others have railed against. I'm only guilty of disliking the current President for the damage to political discourse that he, and his predecessor, had inflicted on our country. That, and that alone, has caused them to duck behind an ignore feature and levy undue criticism upon others here.

    For the record, if an errant mention of an M1 Garand on the Major's namesake forum calls for complaint. Well...who's really driving this revered gun forum into the ground? Certainly not I.
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

    Comment

    • S.A. Boggs
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 8568

      #47
      Originally posted by jcg&jmbfan
      Yes, the mention of a M1 was just another hijack of the thread. But as I said, the mention of a M1 on this whole site was eventful. Not sure why you are jumping on me though?
      Not speaking for Allen, from my perspective Allen was addressing the inclusion of an M1 into the discourse. Apparently Togey was trying to distract and alter the thread in another direction. Often when questioning the mentally ill one had to redirect the client back to the original conversation. When I got paid to deal with the mentally ill I listened, now that I am retired the ramblings of the mentally ill I try to avoid. Also the mentally ill will use a statement to anger if more then the client/clinician is involved. I have seen this ploy used in group settings when one client becomes uncomfortable or as a means to control the subject in question. I don't read "their" mentally ill ramblings due to "their" need to oppose, anger, control any conversation. If one says white, "they" will say black. These mentally ill people are basically anti-social and are trying to control every conversation...a need for total control. To give/allow their speech is to give into their domination of YOU, so why do it? If one does allow their conversation then one has to ask is the receiver possibly enjoy being abused? Intelligent conversational social interaction with "our" mentally ill appears to be non-existent so why try?
      Sam

      Comment

      • Allen
        Moderator
        • Sep 2009
        • 10580

        #48
        Thanks Sam. You hit it on the nail head.

        Sorry jcg&jmbfan, I wasn't jumping on you--your comments are welcome here. I was merely pointing out the change of the subject made by those that have nothing to add and don't like that the conversation is NOT going in their favor so they just try to change it.

        As far as politics go over gun conversations that is what this forum is made of. The Major provided for threads just for politics and the 2nd amendment talk so it happens. If someone has an issue with a Garand or any other make of gun it will still be addressed as well as possible just like before.

        Meanwhile, after the near destruction of America left by 8 years of obama, 8 years of clinton and 12 years of RINO Bushes there's a lot of political aftermath to mention here, especially with the orangutan news media and congress we still have.

        Comment

        • Roadkingtrax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 7835

          #49
          Sam proves the point once again with a classic case of projection. No one is out to control him, but he certainly plays the victim well.

          Lack of paragraphs might suggest he's not dealing with anger well. It's been his issue in the past.
          Last edited by Roadkingtrax; 05-23-2019, 12:06.
          "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #50
            Originally posted by Roadkingtrax
            Sam proves the point once again with a classic case of projection. No one is out to control him, but he certainly plays the victim well.

            Lack of paragraphs might suggest he's not dealing with anger well. It's been his issue in the past.
            That plus an addiction to quotation marks. Especially around pronouns.

            Also:

            Sam, I found an M1 for you. Brand new. It's Airsoft but that's OK, right?

            The first standard issue semi-automatic rifle issued to the US Armed Forces, the M1 Garand was referred to as the greatest battle implement ever devised by General George S. Patton. Replacing the venerable Springfield M1903 in 1936, the M1 Garand quickly displayed its huge advantage on the battlef...
            Last edited by togor; 05-23-2019, 01:36.

            Comment

            • jcg&jmbfan
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2012
              • 102

              #51
              Originally posted by Allen
              Thanks Sam. You hit it on the nail head.

              Sorry jcg&jmbfan, I wasn't jumping on you--your comments are welcome here. I was merely pointing out the change of the subject made by those that have nothing to add and don't like that the conversation is NOT going in their favor so they just try to change it.

              As far as politics go over gun conversations that is what this forum is made of. The Major provided for threads just for politics and the 2nd amendment talk so it happens. If someone has an issue with a Garand or any other make of gun it will still be addressed as well as possible just like before.
              My bad for reading too fast and not catching the correct context.

              "As far as politics go over gun conversations that is what this forum is made of." It is now, but wasn't back in this site's prime.

              I think Mr. Boggs stated the Major and Swede would have booted them by now. They were all here when the Culver's ran the show and didn't put up with any nonsense. But the tres amigos were much milder then because of having real supervision.

              Comment

              • Sandpebble
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2017
                • 2196

                #52
                Originally posted by jcg&jmbfan
                My bad for reading too fast and not catching the correct context.

                "As far as politics go over gun conversations that is what this forum is made of." It is now, but wasn't back in this site's prime.

                I think Mr. Boggs stated the Major and Swede would have booted them by now. They were all here when the Culver's ran the show and didn't put up with any nonsense. But the tres amigos were much milder then because of having real supervision.
                "But the tres amigos were much milder then because of having real supervision." .... this is where you are wrong .

                I started posting here on the forums under Sandpebble back in 98 . By 2002 we had a "Political Forum" and I was here crabbing about our unsealed border.... and by 2004 had my ass handed me by many here for whining because I couldn't "compete" with uneducated Mexicans. Seems many still present here were happy to get their grass cut for $15 bucks back then.

                Now... years later... those same posters are against all those things I argued against 14 years ago ....

                never once got sent to the "Romper Room " until last year when I ridiculed the play soldier militia types .... imagine that.

                Comment

                • S.A. Boggs
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 8568

                  #53
                  Originally posted by jcg&jmbfan
                  My bad for reading too fast and not catching the correct context.

                  "As far as politics go over gun conversations that is what this forum is made of." It is now, but wasn't back in this site's prime.

                  I think Mr. Boggs stated the Major and Swede would have booted them by now. They were all here when the Culver's ran the show and didn't put up with any nonsense. But the tres amigos were much milder then because of having real supervision.
                  Apparently "they" were able to keep their mental illness in check, many can. As "they" aged the mental illness blossomed more. Mental illness is not an amusing aspect of life, especially for the mentally ill individual. Anti Social Personality Disorder [ASPD] is more common then people realize. Road rage is a classic example of the illness and often fatal...for someone. The sad part is that these individuals often "nit pick" when confronted as a form of defense among other's. Forums often bring out these individuals as "they" feel empowered behind a pseudo identification and hyped up machismo.
                  Sam

                  Comment

                  • Roadkingtrax
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 7835

                    #54
                    Sam is not a doctor, but maybe he stays at Holiday Inns?
                    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                    Comment

                    • Sandpebble
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 2196

                      #55
                      Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                      Apparently "they" were able to keep their mental illness in check, many can. As "they" aged the mental illness blossomed more. Mental illness is not an amusing aspect of life, especially for the mentally ill individual. Anti Social Personality Disorder [ASPD] is more common then people realize. Road rage is a classic example of the illness and often fatal...for someone. The sad part is that these individuals often "nit pick" when confronted as a form of defense among other's. Forums often bring out these individuals as "they" feel empowered behind a pseudo identification and hyped up machismo.
                      Sam
                      pseudo identification and hyped up machismo.

                      WOW... coming from the guy who's "Seen the Elephant" "Survived Stage Four" " Put Crispy Bacon People in the Ambulance" "Penciled in a Cum Laude on a Diploma " etc etc etc

                      and this "man" is going to accuse others of hiding behind a pseudo identificatiion ??? good God
                      Last edited by Sandpebble; 05-23-2019, 02:55.

                      Comment

                      • Roadkingtrax
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 7835

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Sandpebble
                        pseudo identification and hyped up machismo.

                        WOW... coming from the guy who's "Seen the Elephant" "Survived Stage Four" " Put Crispy Bacon People in the Ambulance" "Penciled in a Cum Laude on a Diploma " etc etc etc

                        and this "man" is going to accuse others of hiding behind a pseudo identificatiion ??? good God
                        It's fantastically amusing.
                        "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                        Comment

                        • togor
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 17610

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Sandpebble
                          pseudo identification and hyped up machismo.

                          WOW... coming from the guy who's "Seen the Elephant" "Survived Stage Four" " Put Crispy Bacon People in the Ambulance" "Penciled in a Cum Laude on a Diploma " etc etc etc

                          and this "man" is going to accuse others of hiding behind a pseudo identificatiion ??? good God
                          You forgot about the body count his son racked up as a paratrooper in Afghanistan (hero-by-familial-association), but overall your list is pretty good.
                          Last edited by togor; 05-23-2019, 03:03.

                          Comment

                          • jcg&jmbfan
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 102

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Sandpebble
                            "But the tres amigos were much milder then because of having real supervision." .... this is where you are wrong .

                            I started posting here on the forums under Sandpebble back in 98 . By 2002 we had a "Political Forum" and I was here crabbing about our unsealed border.... and by 2004 had my ass handed me by many here for whining because I couldn't "compete" with uneducated Mexicans. Seems many still present here were happy to get their grass cut for $15 bucks back then.

                            Now... years later... those same posters are against all those things I argued against 14 years ago ....

                            never once got sent to the "Romper Room " until last year when I ridiculed the play soldier militia types .... imagine that.
                            I stated you gave good gun related info and posted political content, and I still stand by my milder statement. Thanks.

                            Comment

                            • S.A. Boggs
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 8568

                              #59
                              With "our" three postings I stand by my conclusions of severe mental illness. One can either accept or reject my observation which is based on years of interacting with the mentally ill. Quite frankly it remind me of once as I was leaving the psych hospital and one of my clients was berating me that I placed him there and he was sane. I did not place him there, his illness did. All I did was facilitate him to those who could place him there, our Crisis Intervention Team. If one reads their posts, draw your own conclusions as to the validity of their well being. A stopped clock is right twice per day is a comment to think about as one reads their posts. I take nothing they say personal, why should one?
                              Sam

                              Comment

                              • S.A. Boggs
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 8568

                                #60
                                53714802_2685265241500563_751422713326731264_n.jpg
                                Sam

                                Comment

                                Working...