Impeach Him!!!

[S.A. Boggs]

Was the cry before anyone was selected, now let the process begin to get it over with. One wonder's what "secret" paid for information will come forth. Me thinks the socialists are just unknowingly placing their head in the provirable noose. The noose however is around a reluctant Pelosi as she well understands the consequences to the political party. Mitch will not let this get to the Senate floor as he control's the Senate.
Sam

[m1ashooter]

I've listened to this crap for two years. Please educated members educate me on exactly what laws the President has broken, that warrant impeachment with supporting documentation. I can't find any facts in the case just feelings and emotions.

[Allen]

These dimwits seem to think if they can get Trump impeached that hillary will be the president instead of Pence.

The impeachment needs to be AOC, Pelosi, low IQ Maxine, and most of all rag head Ilhan Omar among many others.

[Vern Humphrey]

Impeachment is a political, not a judicial process. They don't need a crime -- congress is the sole player in an impeachment. They can't do it, of course -- haven't got the votes. And if they did, the Senate would never convict him.

[S.A. Boggs]

I've listened to this crap for two years. Please educated members educate me on exactly what laws the President has broken, that warrant impeachment with supporting documentation. I can't find any facts in the case just feelings and emotions.

It's all about hurt feelings and the destruction that President Trump is doing to their socialist structure.
Samsnoopy.jpg

[togor]

I've listened to this crap for two years. Please educated members educate me on exactly what laws the President has broken, that warrant impeachment with supporting documentation. I can't find any facts in the case just feelings and emotions.

Obstruction of justice is where the red flags are, and this is a judgement call area to some degree, because one has to prove intent. As others have said it's a political process. My own opinion is that we should let the voters decide Trump's fate in the next election. If in the mean time he wasn't always trying to push the envelope as far as having so many actions of his administration challenged in Federal court, that wouldn't bother me.

[Allen]

Was the cry before anyone was selected, now let the process begin to get it over with. One wonder's what "secret" paid for information will come forth. Me thinks the socialists are just unknowingly placing their head in the provirable noose. The noose however is around a reluctant Pelosi as she well understands the consequences to the political party. Mitch will not let this get to the Senate floor as he control's the Senate.
Sam

The dimocrats constantly whine about obstruction of justice w/o any incidence to back it up.

I wonder if this is the same kind of obstruction of justice we see almost every day when one of obama's appointed "judges" blocks Trumps moves?

[togor]

Can it be that aspects of the Mueller report are gradually reaching even Allen's neck of the woods?

[S.A. Boggs]

My Dad was a life long REAL conservative labor Democrat who came of age in the 1930's. He had been President of the local Molders Union and had a temper. Dad was a gentle man until riled, apparently I followed the old man. Dad was on the line to physically fight for what he felt was right...the working man and woman who he wanted to represent and did so. Dad looked at things with a jaundiced eye, "What does the guy really want?" Dad was later a truck driver, a Teamster out of Detroit Local 299...Jimmy Hoffa's home when he was President of the Local as well as the National. I asked Dad about Hoffa and the Mob connection. Dad said it was common knowledge but was part of the good with the bad. Dad said that Hoffa had done more for the rank and file then anyone before.
I didn't understand Dad's reason being a youngster, now older and a little wiser I see it now. Trump isn't perfect, not even close. Trump is a darn sight better then the last ones in over 30 years, haven't seen this employment picture since 1969! What riles me are those who want to go back to what we didn't have and that is insane to say the least. Why go back to less for our people then stay with a man who is DOING more.
Sam

[togor]

My dad was a Republican from a Republican household even during the New Deal era. I have the reply letter sent to him by Barry Goldwater after the '64 election loss. Guys like Helms and Thurmond became Republicans after the civil and voting rights laws got passed. Before that they were Democrats. They switched because their electorates switched, being PO'd by this Federal intrusion into states rights, as they saw it. Boggs doesn't explain the genesis of his family's party switch but probably it is along similar lines. I have to say I feel estranged from the GOP that I knew growing up. It occurs to me that the party started going to hell when all of these southern former-Democrats joined it. Pretty much now the party practices the same sort of election corruption as the Dems used to, when all of these guys were Democrats and needed to jigger the voting process in the south to keep things as they ought to be. The same attitude has now gone national in the party, even to the point of jiggering the census as a deep strategy to support further gerrymandering.

[m1ashooter]

Obstruction of justice is where the red flags are, and this is a judgement call area to some degree, because one has to prove intent. As others have said it's a political process. My own opinion is that we should let the voters decide Trump's fate in the next election. If in the mean time he wasn't always trying to push the envelope as far as having so many actions of his administration challenged in Federal court, that wouldn't bother me.

Thank you

- - - Updated - - -

Thank you all for your answers. This has been the most civil tone on a post in awhile.

[jcg&jmbfan]

It occurs to me that the party started going to hell when all of these southern former-Democrats joined it. Pretty much now the party practices the same sort of election corruption as the Dems used to, when all of these guys were Democrats and needed to jigger the voting process in the south to keep things as they ought to be. The same attitude has now gone national in the party, even to the point of jiggering the census as a deep strategy to support further gerrymandering.

So the Democrats stopped all election corruption after the Helms/Thurmonds left the party? There is no Dem election corruption occurring now?

[togor]

So the Democrats stopped all election corruption after the Helms/Thurmonds left the party? There is no Dem election corruption occurring now?

What I am saying is is that the people who saw their literacy tests and other tactics for managing actual voting taken away by the Voting Rights Act went to the GOP. And that inclination to shade elections lives on with these voter ID laws and high tech gerrymanders and such. Even the census citizenship question has roots in a GOP gerrymander strategy. The old Republicans were more libertarian and would have considered it an insult to make citizens jump through such hoops to cast a ballot as are now advocated. They would rightly consider it an aberration from the South. Even the Reagan Democrats who stayed with the GOP know little about the history and traditions of the party they occupy. Alas there are few of us left who do.

[jcg&jmbfan]

What I am saying is is that the people who saw their literacy tests and other tactics for managing actual voting taken away by the Voting Rights Act went to the GOP. And that inclination to shade elections lives on with these voter ID laws and high tech gerrymanders and such. Even the census citizenship question has roots in a GOP gerrymander strategy. The old Republicans were more libertarian and would have considered it an insult to make citizens jump through such hoops to cast a ballot as are now advocated. They would rightly consider it an aberration from the South. Even the Reagan Democrats who stayed with the GOP know little about the history and traditions of the party they occupy. Alas there are few of us left who do.

I know I am a little slow on the uptake, but I don't see an answer to my questions. No Dem corruption now? A person showing up at an election poll and just saying a name can't lead to corruption? When Dems draw the voting districts there is no gerrymandering?

I guess it's all about perspective. IMO, when the Helms and Thurmonds retired and died off, the Republican party went to hell. Most Reps of today are nothing more than light Dems or Trojan horses.

[togor]

I know I am a little slow on the uptake, but I don't see an answer to my questions. No Dem corruption now? A person showing up at an election poll and just saying a name can't lead to corruption? When Dems draw the voting districts there is no gerrymandering?

I guess it's all about perspective. IMO, when the Helms and Thurmonds retired and died off, the Republican party went to hell. Most Reps of today are nothing more than light Dems or Trojan horses.

Politicians of both parties engage in corrupt actions. Anyways, the fact that you regard Democrats like Helms and Thurmond to be heroes of the GOP suggest that you and I are not going to have a meeting of minds on what the GOP ought to be. So we at least agree on that.