Turnover ... not a popover .... turnover

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sandpebble
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 2196

    #1

    Turnover ... not a popover .... turnover

    Just got back from an extended overseas vacation sans phone or internet use. Wonderfull.

    First things I notice on my return to the internet is a report on all those fired or resigned from the present administration.

    In no particular order .... Mattis, Sessions, Hicks, Tillerson, Haley, Omarosa, Pruitt, Yates, Porter, McGahn, McMaster, Sadler, Cohn, Flynn, Shulkin, Comey, Spicer, Priebus, Bannon, Scaramucci, Walsh, Price, Bharara, Dubke, Shaub, Gorka, Dearborn, Sanders... and Sanders. { no mention that some have been arrested, or the likes of Stone }

    Hellova turnover... human resources at Home Depot or Walmart would have been fired by now ....... just saying
  • blackhawknj
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 3754

    #2
    IIRC in Mattis's case it was a matter of principle.

    Comment

    • lyman
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 11269

      #3
      human resources at Home Depot or Walmart would have been fired by now
      nope,

      HR,, in the business of expanding HR by creating more reasons to have HR,,

      just like a pile of Gov't Bureaucrats looking to keep their jobs for life

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        HR in my experience is there to keep the company from getting sued. Certainly they're not there to help employees 'maximize their potential' or anything like that.

        But it's also true that we're long past believing that this administration puts a priority on competence. Dick Hosmer once pointed out to me (and I agreed) that hires like Tillerson suggested Trump wasn't just interested in "yes" men. That seems like an eternity ago, because yes-men are all they want now. And they don't even bother sending names to the Senate anymore for confirmation. All as I predicted, that the proprietor of a mom-and-pop real estate outfit would be unable to manage the executive branch.
        Last edited by togor; 06-26-2019, 04:41.

        Comment

        • Dolt
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 543

          #5
          Originally posted by togor
          HR in my experience is there to keep the company from getting sued. Certainly they're not there to help employees 'maximize their potential' or anything like that.

          But it's also true that we're long past believing that this administration puts a priority on competence. Dick Hosmer once pointed out to me (and I agreed) that hires like Tillerson suggested Trump wasn't just interested in "yes" men. That seems like an eternity ago, because yes-men are all they want now. And they don't even bother sending names to the Senate anymore for confirmation. All as I predicted, that the proprietor of a mom-and-pop real estate outfit would be unable to manage the executive branch.

          Once again, the dogs bark, and the caravan moves on.....
          Read, think, UNDERSTAND, comment

          Comment

          Working...