Loony stuff that's kind of popular these days.

[dryheat]

Don't even try to read this whole thing. You'll go crazy. His mom manages his "career". No dad mentioned. You've seen this. You wave your arms back and forth in front of you.

https://www.topic.com/can-a-dance-sensation-s-viral-moment-last-forever?utm_source=pocket-newtab

[bruce]

Men come and men go. Some father children. Lots of women end up raising the children who are abandoned. A father present and engaged would have made a positive contribution the life of this young man. The mother ... no criticism of her. Not much difference with what this young man is doing and other "fads" that have been common throughout years past. Sincerely. bruce.

[Vern Humphrey]

Hell isn't hot enough for a man who would abandon his children.

[blackhawknj]

The women who destroy their unborn children belong down there too.

[Vern Humphrey]

The women who destroy their unborn children belong down there too.

Absolutely.

My Burden

I lie beside my new-born daughter
A tiny spark of life
What a miracle we have created!
I and my beloved wife

She lies on a quilt on the floor
Making a tiny, fluttering sound
I lie down beside her
My love for her is profound

Guarding her, watching over her
I shelter her under my arm
While her father is on guard
She cannot come to harm

I have taken up my burden
I’ll carry it as far as I can
Only by being a father
Can a man be truly a man

I lie beside my daughter
And feel her tiny breath
I will be faithful to this little one
Faithful unto death.

[togor]

The women who destroy their unborn children belong down there too.

For the umpteenth time, where's the line? Fertilized egg? Second trimester? Belly full of semen? Always with the judgement, never with a practical plan for the real world. This time will be no different. Moralizers need to attend to their own failings before attacking the liberty of others.

[S.A. Boggs]

For the umpteenth time, where's the line? Fertilized egg? Second trimester? Belly full of semen? Always with the judgement, never with a practical plan for the real world. This time will be no different. Moralizers need to attend to their own failings before attacking the liberty of others.

Liberty starts with the first heartbeat, to murder a defenseless child is cowardly. I abhor cowards in any way, shape or form! I have no compulsion with shooting any coward!
Sam

[Roadkingtrax]

Liberty starts with the first heartbeat, to murder a defenseless child is cowardly. I abhor cowards in any way, shape or form! I have no compulsion with shooting any coward!
Sam

How many abortionists have you threatened with gun violence? Have you shot any?

[blackhawknj]

1. Pro choice before conception, pro life afterwards.
2. Where's the "man's right to choose" ?
3. "It takes a village....." The village has no say in who becomes a parent-a mother. But it always has to pick up the tab for welfare, WIC, food stamps, medical care, schools-jails.

[dryheat]

Boy, did this ever go off the track.

[togor]

1. Pro choice before conception, pro life afterwards.
2. Where's the "man's right to choose" ?
3. "It takes a village....." The village has no say in who becomes a parent-a mother. But it always has to pick up the tab for welfare, WIC, food stamps, medical care, schools-jails.

Well at least you're ok with birth control. Morning-after pill too? And let's not forget R&I (rape and incest).

As for men.....when they start carrying babies, they can have FINAL SAY. Not before. But as a practical matter, a man who makes good by the woman has a fair shot at seeing the kid born, on the reasoning that if she was completely repulsed by him, she wouldn't have let him insider her in the first place. Anyways, children shouldn't be brought into the world as a means of punishing socially discouraged behavior. Should they?

[lyman]

Well at least you're ok with birth control. Morning-after pill too? And let's not forget R&I (rape and incest).

As for men.....when they start carrying babies, they can have FINAL SAY. Not before. But as a practical matter, a man who makes good by the woman has a fair shot at seeing the kid born, on the reasoning that if she was completely repulsed by him, she wouldn't have let him insider her in the first place. Anyways, children shouldn't be brought into the world as a means of punishing socially discouraged behavior. Should they?

interesting concept

- - - Updated - - -

For the umpteenth time, where's the line? Fertilized egg? Second trimester? Belly full of semen? Always with the judgement, never with a practical plan for the real world. This time will be no different. Moralizers need to attend to their own failings before attacking the liberty of others.

the line is over there, scratched in the sand,

problem is, the tides come and go and erase that line, and when it is redrawn, by either side, it is in a different place,


meanwhile life manages to go on, even with both sides proclaiming doom and gloom for humankind

[Vern Humphrey]

An unborn child is a living human being. There is a three-part test:

1. Is it living? If it were not, we would not be having this discussion.
2. Is it human? Check the DNA -- if it has human DNA, it's human.
3. Is it a being? Check the DNA again -- if it has it's own DNA it's a being.

The pre-meditated killing of a perfectly innocent living human being is murder, pure and simple, regardless of the age, state of development, or handicaps.

[togor]

Not to put too fine a point on the subject, but if Vernon insists that a fertilized egg = human adult, then I suppose it becomes necessary to point out that the liberty of some may at times may mean the death of others. It's unfortunate but as true of the miscarried embryo as it is of the parent and child found drowned at the border, or for that matter, villagers in Vietnam who were in the wrong place at the wrong time when a fire mission was called in. And if the embryo is innocent before the eyes of God, who among men can authoritatively say otherwise about the dead at our border, or the casualties of war who never took up arms?

My knock on Vernon's line of argument is that it fixates on a single aspect, to the exclusion of all others. The real world is an infinitely more complex and conflicted place than his logic allows.

[S.A. Boggs]

Not to put too fine a point on the subject, but if Vernon insists that a fertilized egg = human adult, then I suppose it becomes necessary to point out that the liberty of some may at times may mean the death of others. It's unfortunate but as true of the miscarried embryo as it is of the parent and child found drowned at the border, or for that matter, villagers in Vietnam who were in the wrong place at the wrong time when a fire mission was called in. And if the embryo is innocent before the eyes of God, who among men can authoritatively say otherwise about the dead at our border, or the casualties of war who never took up arms?

My knock on Vernon's line of argument is that it fixates on a single aspect, to the exclusion of all others. The real world is an infinitely more complex and conflicted place than his logic allows.

A baby who is murdered has no choice or chance at life. How does one "feel" if a person does retroactive abortion?
Sam