Trump's controversial tweet

[dryheat]

Clintonhater is valuable because he is the non-fake news on Culvers. No long winded analysis. Right to the point. When I watch Face the Nation or some other Sunday morning stuff I get to watch the panelists roll their eyes and make funny faces. They are tipping their hands about where they stand. They do it because they think everyone watching "gets it". Not me. And not a lot of the population.

[Roadkingtrax]

Boy you have really hit a sore spot with our "squad" of ???
Sam

Not a sore point at all. It was a normal conversation, and no reason to stir anything up SOC.

[S.A. Boggs]

IF what the President is doing is opposed by "polls" and 90% are against what President Trump stands for why the huge crowds? CNN who hates the President in on the wane, Fox News is continuing to upswing. I asked my wife at her work site who talks positively about the Democrats winning in the next election and my wife could only think of one person. People don't like being blasted for liking/voting for Trump so the polls will continue to get it wrong. AOC is sucking up the air around the Democratic Party with her wild eyed banishments, Pelosi is failing to do anything about her. The party candidates embrace what AOC is saying and going further left.
The pendulum is swinging to the other side and CH apparently has a functional crystal ball. "Our" AOC boosters are still using the pre-2016 methods.
Sam

[Roadkingtrax]

I agree, people are embarrassed to vote for Trump.

Sam and I agree. What a day, and it just started!

[Major Tom]

Tom you're in Iowa! And have you canvassed your black neighbors on Trump's remarks?

Right now, in my neighborhood, is being "integrated" and several residents are moving out. Why? Because the "people" being brought in do not take care of their big fancy house which were given to them under Section 8 housing. Trash all over, traffic 24/7, loud music/cars, persons being stupid. They don't talk to us, period!

[S.A. Boggs]

Right now, in my neighborhood, is being "integrated" and several residents are moving out. Why? Because the "people" being brought in do not take care of their big fancy house which were given to them under Section 8 housing. Trash all over, traffic 24/7, loud music/cars, persons being stupid. They don't talk to us, period!

Unfortunately this is often the case of "Section 8" housing. In our area if a resident does not take care of the provided residence out on the ear they go. Drug abuse, inability to get along with other residents can get one booted from a housing complex. Individual housing is another story as otherwise noted.
Sam

[Allen]

Since people living in section 8 housing do not have to work they don't. They have plenty of time for all night partying and drug abuse. If people can party, sell drugs, steal cars, rape women, drive around 24/7 and loiter they can work. This is another area of welfare that needs severe restrictions.

[togor]

In short, you don't know what you're talking about--unless, like me, you're watching 2 hours of national TV news reporting every day, surfing from one channel to the next to hear almost all of the political garbage, which from one network to the next is almost identical, as if they're ALL reading from the same script, which in effect they are--the Far Left Manifesto. A foreigner watching this coverage must wonder "how did this enemy of the people, this racist criminal ever get elected?", because, according to the reporting they're hearing, the WHOLE COUNTRY (excepting a small handful of Nazis & Klansmen) opposes everything he's trying to do.

A) you're channel surfing for 2 hours, day-after-day, mainlining the outrage. No wonder you're torqued off.

B) you're skewed to the far right so everything looks far left to you. You wouldn't know a centrist position if it bit you between the legs.

[clintonhater]

You wouldn't know a centrist position if it bit you between the legs.

You mean a "centrist" position like open borders, which the media support enthusiastically, as demonstrated by their DAILY "heartbreaking" (that is the VERY word most commonly used by the news anchors--I've heard it a thousand times!) litanies of the "horrors" inflicted on poor, suffering, refugees by Trump?

[togor]

You mean a "centrist" position like open borders, which the media support enthusiastically, as demonstrated by their DAILY "heartbreaking" (that is the VERY word most commonly used by the news anchors--I've heard it a thousand times!) litanies of the "horrors" inflicted on poor, suffering, refugees by Trump?

You make my point for me. That's a far left position that you heard uttered on Rachel Maddow's show or similar. That is clearly not a generally held position, but you are unable to tell the difference. Your analysis is emotional as opposed to analytical. You assert that someone else is saying/doing horrible things in order to justify your own positions. And in the end....who cares what is on TV? Go outside and get some fresh air. Chop some firewood or wash windows. Something that brings a greater sense of accomplishment than 2 hours flipping channels on the tube. Has there ever been anyone whose final regret was "dammit I wish I would have watched more TV"?

[Vern Humphrey]

You mean a "centrist" position like open borders, which the media support enthusiastically, as demonstrated by their DAILY "heartbreaking" (that is the VERY word most commonly used by the news anchors--I've heard it a thousand times!) litanies of the "horrors" inflicted on poor, suffering, refugees by Trump?

And they never ask, "If it's so bad here, why don't they stay home?"

[clintonhater]

You make my point for me. That's a far left position that you heard uttered on Rachel Maddow's show or similar. That is clearly not a generally held position, but you are unable to tell the difference. Your analysis is emotional as opposed to analytical.

Your analysis is based on ignorance of what's happening on the broadcast media. I never watch that lesbo, or anything else on CNN or MSN. All the "far-left" reporting I'm referring to is coming from the MAINSTREAM (so-called!) media! OF COURSE, they have sense enough, & duplicity enough, not to announce explicitly "we support open borders," exactly as Pelosi & Dems refrain openly from doing, but here is a text-book case, if there ever was one, of actions speaking louder than words! Day after day after day on every evening news cast, the "terrible mistreatment" of poor innocent migrants is harped on, with never the remotest suggestion that they are flouting our immigration laws.

"Who cares"? Somebody must, or news anchors like Mat Lauer wouldn't be paid 10 million a year to read a teleprompter.

[togor]

Your analysis is based on ignorance of what's happening on the broadcast media. I never watch that lesbo, or anything else on CNN or MSN. All the "far-left" reporting I'm referring to is coming from the MAINSTREAM (so-called!) media! OF COURSE, they have sense enough, & duplicity enough, not to announce explicitly "we support open borders," exactly as Pelosi & Dems refrain openly from doing, but here is a text-book case, if there ever was one, of actions speaking louder than words! Day after day after day on every evening news cast, the "terrible mistreatment" of poor innocent migrants is harped on, with never the remotest suggestion that they are flouting our immigration laws.

"Who cares"? Somebody must, or news anchors like Mat Lauer wouldn't be paid 10 million a year to read a teleprompter.

Clearly you care a lot about TV. Sometimes I'll skim the carefully curated stuff at foxnews.com. It's a carefully seasoned gumbo of political outrage, heatwarming stories, tear-jerkers, and of a tidbit about this or that hottie, because, well, who doesn't like to hear about what some pretty girl is up to--so long as there are pictures. The harvest of stories changes daily, but the secret formula is the same. And you don't think you're being fed something to keep you coming back for more, you're fooling yourself. As near as I can tell, your gripe amounts to: not enough outlets are selling the same product as Fox. How about: if there was more of a market for it, they would. Again, you think it somehow ought to be against the rules for most people to think as they do, which is to say: differently than you on most subjects. Not exactly a free-market conservative, are you?

[Sandpebble]

Your analysis is based on ignorance of what's happening on the broadcast media. I never watch that lesbo, or anything else on CNN or MSN. All the "far-left" reporting I'm referring to is coming from the MAINSTREAM (so-called!) media! OF COURSE, they have sense enough, & duplicity enough, not to announce explicitly "we support open borders," exactly as Pelosi & Dems refrain openly from doing, but here is a text-book case, if there ever was one, of actions speaking louder than words! Day after day after day on every evening news cast, the "terrible mistreatment" of poor innocent migrants is harped on, with never the remotest suggestion that they are flouting our immigration laws.

"Who cares"? Somebody must, or news anchors like Mat Lauer wouldn't be paid 10 million a year to read a teleprompter.

{ with never the remotest suggestion that they are flouting our immigration laws. }


That is quite true .... but why are we so proud that German and Japanese prisoners of war were treated far better ? ... maybe because they didn't break the law ? ....

[Dolt]

If you take away the votes of all of the illegals who voted for Hillary Clinton, I am sure Trump won the popular vote as well. Watch what happens in 2020.