Ruth Bladder Ginsburg is dreaming

[clintonhater]

One might guess she's enjoying life right now.

Absolutely she is! Not only by casting her party-line left-wing votes, absolutely predictable on any issue (like those of the other two far-left bitches, who NEVER forget they're on an ideological "mission"), but principally by thwarting Trump's right to name her replacement. Her immense self-satisfaction in preventing that will probably keep her alive until he's gone.

Every vote she & her co-lefties have cast is an expression of intense, virulent, ill-will to me personally, because my beliefs & values ARE me! I wish her back every scintilla of it.

[togor]

Who among us wouldn't want to feel valued and vital at an advanced age?

And CH, projection.

[blackhawknj]

The Wall Street Journal noted during the Kavanagh confirmation battle that the court's are the Liberals preferred legislature, at the time of the Bork confirmation battle in 1987 Hodding Carter III said that "for thirty years liberals have been relying on the least democratic branch of the government to get their agenda through." The Court is sort of the Democrats Politburo, the actual government is merely an executive agency to carry out its decrees.
I will credit her with being opposed to the Democrats "court packing"-actually court expanding-proposals.

[togor]

The Wall Street Journal noted during the Kavanagh confirmation battle that the court's are the Liberals preferred legislature, at the time of the Bork confirmation battle in 1987 Hodding Carter III said that "for thirty years liberals have been relying on the least democratic branch of the government to get their agenda through." The Court is sort of the Democrats Politburo, the actual government is merely an executive agency to carry out its decrees.
I will credit her with being opposed to the Democrats "court packing"-actually court expanding-proposals.

I think what the WSJ was getting at is that facts and the Consitution (plain language reading) have a liberal bias, to which even the most conservative jurist occasionally yields. It can't always be about what's good for the Republican party or its donor class (although they try to make it so as much as possible). Now by "liberal" (small l) I'm talking about it in a sensible Western-civilization way, not a nutty open-all-the-border-gates way. Just to be clear on that point.

Speaking of Republican donors, if anyone ever gave to CPAC or one of the related PACs with impressive names like New Conservative Coalition, Conservative Majority Fund, American Conservative Union, etc., then they were scammed.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...rogers-1428260

[blackhawknj]

I have always considered the Constitution to be a very conservative document, with its emphasis on separation of powers, restrictions on government, careful language.
While RBG admitted that if they can't find anything in the Constitution or Federal law to support their argument, they'll look at foreign law.

[S.A. Boggs]

The Constitution was written for what the common person can expect from government, not what the government can steal from the common person.
Sam

[Vern Humphrey]

The Constitution was written for what the common person can expect from government, not what the government can steal from the common person.
Sam

Now tell that to the National Socialists -- and make them believe it.

[S.A. Boggs]

Now tell that to the National Socialists -- and make them believe it.

45 (2).jpg
Sam

[Roadkingtrax]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]46331[/ATTACH]
Sam

Another poor attempt at historical quotations? Perhaps this will persuade Sam to check his facts before presenting another lesson. One can dream...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/lies-and-damned-lies/Content%3foid=20893180&media=AMP%2bHTML

[togor]

Next thing we know Sam will be warning us about useful idiots with nary a twinge of irony.

[JohnPeeff]

Who said it then?