Trump set this whole Mueller SC stunt up from the beginning

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rkohut
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 1115

    #1

    Trump set this whole Mueller SC stunt up from the beginning

    The Mueller Special Counsel was designed by Trump to navigate around the installed Obama FBI/DOJ rats and gather evidence to expose Obama and the Deep State (DS).

    Trump needed to hunt the DS, but the DS was completely within the corrupt Obama FBI/DOJ. How's he going to do it?
    Special Prosecutor (SP)

    Trump told everyone he would hire a special prosecutor to look into Hillary, and the DS.


    Mueller was that Special Prosecutor.

    Trump had a 4 hour meeting with Mueller and Rosenstein the day before Mueller was announced as SP by Rosenstein

    A special counsel/prosecutor is separate from the usual DOJ/FBI prosecuting authority. SP is designed to navigate around the installed blockade(FBI/DOJ), because the rats in the Obama DOJ/FBI couldn’t look at what Mueller was doing. Also Congress couldn’t look at what Mueller was doing, citing “ongoing investigation”.

    This is why Trump engaged in so much public theater, to create the optic that Mueller was a separate entity that didn’t answer to Trump. Classic Trump "Rope-A-Dope(s)"

    Mueller was designed by Trump to buy time to drain the swamp, end ongoing house/senate investigations, replace judges, win over the minds of the public, discredit the MSM, convince foreign actors that Trump didn’t pull strings. Mueller was designed to give the left/MSM what they wanted see, so they would Trust Mueller.

    The still 'secret' part of the Mueller report? You guessed it, all exposing the criminal activity of the Dems, DS, and those in MSM who were paid handsomely for their 'unbiased opinions'.

    Dems/MSM are now in an inescapable trap and the best is yet to come. The scum will be exposed slowly over the next year, timed for the 2020 election. Also, it will be released very slowly to minimize the cognitive dissonance that many of the 'children' will suffer from.

    Attached Files
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    Nothing otherwise known about the man (Trump) suggests a word of this is true. On the other hand the right wing grass roots has been so bombarded with bogus conspiracy theories for at least a decade now that it's no wonder people there cannot tell fact from fiction. If a deep game is what you seek, look there. Meanwhile Mitch McConnell, by blocking an election security law, has as much admitted that the GOP needs Ivan to keep feeding its base a steady diet of bullcrap to keep it competitive at the polls. Think about that the next time you're tending to a flag pole.
    Last edited by togor; 07-26-2019, 03:16.

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #3
      Mueller ain't that smart.

      Comment

      • RED
        Very Senior Member - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 11689

        #4
        A pipe dream without a scrap of truth here.

        It is a mistake to make up or buy into total BS thinking you are helping the cause. Just like when the left accused Trump of collusion with the Russians. It was all BS and it got the House for the Nazis but assured a 2nd term for Trump.

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          Red we know for a fact that Putin was pulling oars for Trump. Claiming vindication for Donny because no one called out a cadence misses the point.

          Comment

          • barretcreek
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2013
            • 6065

            #6
            Putin sure didn't want the 'Beast, but he was pulling for Bernie. Senile fool would have pulled an Anschluss to join us up with Ivan.

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              Originally posted by barretcreek
              Putin sure didn't want the 'Beast, but he was pulling for Bernie. Senile fool would have pulled an Anschluss to join us up with Ivan.
              There was some BS thrown Bernie's way but the main love is for Donald. I say *is*, in the present tense.

              Comment

              • S.A. Boggs
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 8568

                #8
                Originally posted by barretcreek
                Putin sure didn't want the 'Beast, but he was pulling for Bernie. Senile fool would have pulled an Anschluss to join us up with Ivan.
                +1
                Sam

                Comment

                • barretcreek
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 6065

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  There was some BS thrown Bernie's way but the main love is for Donald. I say *is*, in the present tense.
                  I think the difference between Vlado's feeling for DT over the 'Beast is Trump is a negotiator and a tough one. HRC is just a corrupt treasonous harpy whose word is not to be trusted.

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by barretcreek
                    I think the difference between Vlado's feeling for DT over the 'Beast is Trump is a negotiator and a tough one. HRC is just a corrupt treasonous harpy whose word is not to be trusted.
                    Trump may be a tough negotiator, but evidence suggests he is not a shrewd one. For all the hoopla over NAFTA and the USCMTA, can anyone tell me a major difference between them that justifies all the noise?

                    To keep things on topic, how about tough guy Trump starts getting tough about election interference? Too much to ask?
                    Last edited by togor; 07-27-2019, 07:56.

                    Comment

                    • JohnPeeff
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 252

                      #11
                      The Steele dossier and Fusion Gps were all based on Russian disinformation designed to help the Clinton campaign hurt Trump. Maybe the Russians favored neither side and were trying to disrupt the whole process? Do you think we interfere in Russian elections? (if you can call them that) Obama interfered, unsuccessfully, in a Israeli election. It is something governments do but they usually don't get caught.

                      Comment

                      • barretcreek
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2013
                        • 6065

                        #12
                        Originally posted by togor
                        Trump may be a tough negotiator, but evidence suggests he is not a shrewd one. For all the hoopla over NAFTA and the USCMTA, can anyone tell me a major difference between them that justifies all the noise?

                        To keep things on topic, how about tough guy Trump starts getting tough about election interference? Too much to ask?
                        Sure. Paper ballots, voter ID, and knowing how many citizens and legal residents are being used to define a Congressional District. And remember, Putin knows a traitor when he sees her.

                        Comment

                        • Vern Humphrey
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 15875

                          #13
                          Originally posted by barretcreek
                          Sure. Paper ballots, voter ID, and knowing how many citizens and legal residents are being used to define a Congressional District. And remember, Putin knows a traitor when he sees her.
                          Amazing how people who claimed Trump "colluded" with Putin to influence our elections have no problem with illegals being counted for purposes of redistricting.

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                            Amazing how people who claimed Trump "colluded" with Putin to influence our elections have no problem with illegals being counted for purposes of redistricting.

                            Total argument fail. The census question didn't differentiate between legals or otherwise. That was the game the redistrictors wanted to play. So someone on a H1B or green card who pays more taxes than you doesn't deserve representation? Geeze, and you were the one who claimed to disapprove of gerrymanders.

                            Oh and look at the red state of Georgia. Elections are tabulated with no paper trail. Excel spreadsheets and thumb drives.
                            Last edited by togor; 07-27-2019, 12:55.

                            Comment

                            • Allen
                              Moderator
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 10583

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                              Amazing how people who claimed Trump "colluded" with Putin to influence our elections have no problem with illegals being counted for purposes of redistricting.
                              +1

                              Their motto is: pi$$ on America, we want the votes and head count.

                              Comment

                              Working...