Found between the want ads and the obituaries

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barretcreek
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 6065

    #1

    Found between the want ads and the obituaries



    Let's see where this ends up buried.



    Little more detail.
    Last edited by barretcreek; 08-15-2019, 01:06.
  • pmclaine
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 2555

    #2
    Togor says "consistency.........Ivanka used GMail too, Its the same thing.".
    Last edited by pmclaine; 08-15-2019, 11:52.

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #3
      Originally posted by pmclaine
      Togor says "consistency.........Ivanka used GMail too, Its the same thing.".
      Please don't quote the Three Stooges.

      Comment

      • Sandpebble
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2017
        • 2196

        #4
        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
        Please don't quote the Three Stooges.
        Why not ? .... what are you afraid of ??

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          Who knows if this is real or not. The blogger is not going to be shunned if the claim fails to pan out. Why? Because they're not getting paid. If it's BS, well hey, it was free so what do you expect? Conspiracy stuff is almost invariably free BS, which some find entertaining like escapist fare. Some get addicted to the idea that it's all conspiracy.

          And for a select few, like your Rachels Maddow or Seans Hannity, then you can BS for big bucks under the aegis of opinion.. Definitely nice work if you can get it!!

          Adding a post-script: I remember when Rush came on the scene, in the 90's. People thought he was really one-sided, and questioned the political agenda of the outlets that carried him. No-no, said Rush, this isn't serious commentary, it's all just entertainment. Rush was telling people that he wasn't to be taken seriously. Does he feel that way now? Was he BS'ing then? Who was he BS'ing?

          Also, people who talk about a liberal media bias must not own radios. Talk radio is almost exclusively conservative. But in many ways there is a symbiosis between the guys in the booth and the sponsors, as in the same guy saying: Liberals suck! Buy these pillows!
          Last edited by togor; 08-15-2019, 04:50.

          Comment

          • lyman
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 11269

            #6
            Originally posted by togor
            Who knows if this is real or not. The blogger is not going to be shunned if the claim fails to pan out. Why? Because they're not getting paid. If it's BS, well hey, it was free so what do you expect? Conspiracy stuff is almost invariably free BS, which some find entertaining like escapist fare. Some get addicted to the idea that it's all conspiracy.

            And for a select few, like your Rachels Maddow or Seans Hannity, then you can BS for big bucks under the aegis of opinion.. Definitely nice work if you can get it!!

            Adding a post-script: I remember when Rush came on the scene, in the 90's. People thought he was really one-sided, and questioned the political agenda of the outlets that carried him. No-no, said Rush, this isn't serious commentary, it's all just entertainment. Rush was telling people that he wasn't to be taken seriously. Does he feel that way now? Was he BS'ing then? Who was he BS'ing?

            Also, people who talk about a liberal media bias must not own radios. Talk radio is almost exclusively conservative. But in many ways there is a symbiosis between the guys in the booth and the sponsors, as in the same guy saying: Liberals suck! Buy these pillows!
            doesn't that apply to liberal TV too,,, just not as direct (as in the lib tv person on MSNBC or CNN is not directly promoting pillows, but still has the advertisement)

            Comment

            • barretcreek
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2013
              • 6065

              #7
              The whole point of these two links is that the Senate testimony documents and confirms what was leaked several months ago.

              Follow the hot links to the Senate report and Senator Grassley's comments. This ain't "who knows..."

              Comment

              • pmclaine
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2010
                • 2555

                #8
                Originally posted by barretcreek
                The whole point of these two links is that the Senate testimony documents and confirms what was leaked several months ago.

                Follow the hot links to the Senate report and Senator Grassley's comments. This ain't "who knows..."
                Yep, think these docs dropped same day as Philly shooting.

                Always something else to cover other than the coup.

                Not saying they are related just that we live in a busy world with an easily distracted population.

                Comment

                Working...