I. G. Horowitz finishes his FISA investigation ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    I. G. Horowitz finishes his FISA investigation ...

    but here come the redactions: by the time the various Agencies
    have finished blacking out all the areas they figure might hurt
    their own credibility, there'll be nothing left and all the villains will
    skate leaving them free to write their memoirs, plug them on CNN
    and live the life of Riley.

    Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has officially completed his investigation into alleged Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses
  • John Kuhns
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1039

    #2
    I certainly hope not. Have told a number of people there was a reason Barr chose NOT to prosecute Comey just yet. These people broke a myriad of laws, lied, and ultimately ended up attempting a coup of a duly elected sitting President of the United States. Had this been done when the last guy was in office those perpetrators would be in prison for life. If these people skate then we can consider the Republic as lost.

    Comment

    • dogtag
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14985

      #3
      Trouble is, these Agencies are huge in terms of manpower
      and are infested with large numbers of liberals who hold
      high office. Things get lost, misplaced, overlooked or simply
      mysteriously vanish - like Hilary's 30,000 e-mails.
      I hope these villains get their comeuppance but I can hold
      my breath for only a short span.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        Some things about the 30K emails I don't understand. First, how do they know how many are missing if they don't have them? Second, if there was really something nefarious in there, then wouldn't it be a lot smarter to make say the 10 bad ones go away? If Hillary is the master crook they say she is then surely she would think of better ways to cover her tracks than with a gaping hole in her email backups, right?
        Last edited by togor; 09-14-2019, 04:22.

        Comment

        • dogtag
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 14985

          #5
          Honest people don't destroy their hard drives and Blackberries
          by pounding them into oblivion and hiding their computers in
          the toilet.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by dogtag
            Honest people don't destroy their hard drives and Blackberries
            by pounding them into oblivion and hiding their computers in
            the toilet.
            Are you sure? Some honest people with no eligibility issues only do FTF sales because even a 4473 is too much for them. You ascribe your motives to the actions of others.
            Last edited by togor; 09-14-2019, 06:04.

            Comment

            • dogtag
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 14985

              #7
              Originally posted by togor
              Are you sure? Some honest people with no eligibility issues only do FTF sales because even a 4473 is too much for them. You ascribe your motives to the actions of others.
              Yes, well that was as clear as mud.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                Originally posted by dogtag
                Yes, well that was as clear as mud.
                Understated! The point is people do things for their own motives, not the ones you assume. Smashing obsolete hard drives is a known and recommended procedure for putting the data out of reach.

                Comment

                • Vern Humphrey
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 15875

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dogtag
                  Yes, well that was as clear as mud.
                  If I cared, I would ask if there was an English version available.

                  Comment

                  • lyman
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 11294

                    #10
                    re those emails,

                    when it is announced that there were classified emails on various devices, some in huma's possession, some in anthony weenie's machines you gotta wonder,

                    surely Gov't IT can tell how many were sent to or thru that magical server that dried up?

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    re those emails,

                    when it is announced that there were classified emails on various devices, some in huma's possession, some in anthony weenie's machines you gotta wonder,

                    surely Gov't IT can tell how many were sent to or thru that magical server that dried up?

                    Comment

                    • k arga
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 566

                      #11
                      togor, what is your problem with a legal ftf transfer, get drivers id and done in my state.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        Originally posted by k arga
                        togor, what is your problem with a legal ftf transfer, get drivers id and done in my state.
                        SC rules, quoted from some web site:

                        In South Carolina individuals may sell their personally owned firearms to any other resident of South Carolina with no government involvement of any kind. Just like selling a chainsaw, a hammer, or a lawn mower – make the deal, exchange value for value and that’s it.

                        There is a burden on the seller to ensure the buyer is eligible to own a firearm, and this is a judgement call made by the seller on how is done.
                        How is the seller supposed to know if a complete stranger doesn't have a disqualifying item on his record?

                        And this question: are millions of illegal guns in criminal hands a good thing or a bad thing? Depending on how one answers, they may look at the situation differently. For my part I don't see why we have to make illegal gun purchases as easy as humanly possible.
                        Last edited by togor; 09-22-2019, 06:19.

                        Comment

                        Working...