If obama is in the DOJ crosshairs = incentive for a Michelle run ...

[dogtag]

With the proviso that obama instigated the spying:
As I've said before, both she and hussein are still very popular,
so what better way to get both himself and the gang exonerated
than to have his wife sitting in the Oval Office ?
I can't see anyone having a dog's chance of beating Trump,
but Michelle along with a lot of newly found ballots and a few
recounts could have a very slim chance. But worth a shot
considering the alternative - jail - assuming the criminal cases
go on through next year. Another assumption is that Barr and
Durham would have the nerve to go after an ex President, and
a popular one at that.

[togor]

They would have to assemble a case and put it before a jury. And Barr himself might need a good lawyer in abot15 months.

[dogtag]

They would have to assemble a case and put it before a jury. And Barr himself might need a good lawyer in abot15 months.

Your straw supply must be getting pretty low by now.

[lyman]

They would have to assemble a case and put it before a jury. And Barr himself might need a good lawyer in abot15 months.

should not be to hard if they get the right folks to roll over,

Fast n Furious would be a good start,

[barretcreek]

I will be amazed (and grateful) if these rodents don't make an attempt on Trump's life. Their hatred is so organic to them I do not see any way it can be tempered. Not a psychologist but the whole thing from the start has struck me as 'projection', everything they have accused Trump of doing is the stuff they have done during the Obama years.
Hillary allowed Russia interests to buy American uranium, she deliberately avoided using gov't email accounts. F&F would be one place to look.

Another thing which has stayed under the radar is the prosecution of the ranchers in OR. The USGS maps of Harney County mineral deposits show a piece of private land roughly in the middle of the uranium deposits. Their ranch. Going through private property is the only way to extract mineral rights without years of court room battles.

[Clark Howard]

The dems will tell any lie, steal any purse, assault any truth, murder any person, bribe any judge, threaten any child, or destroy any nation in order to be in control.

[togor]

The dems will tell any lie, steal any purse, assault any truth, murder any person, bribe any judge, threaten any child, or destroy any nation in order to be in control.

Southern Democrats you mean, from your youth, when you voted Democratic, right? I mean yeah, that did happen, but those guys or their kids switched parties years ago.

[lyman]

Southern Democrats you mean, from your youth, when you voted Democratic, right? I mean yeah, that did happen, but those guys or their kids switched parties years ago.

yellow dog, or southern democrats were more conservative in the time you speak than most RINO's are now

fact is, any politician will do whatever it takes to get in office , regardless of location

[togor]

In FDR's time the Southern Democrats were not liberals, but they did have some affection for FDR and considerable animosity for Republicans. Clark's memory goes back to a time when the people pulling those stunts in NC were Democrats. That line has since switched parties. Clark could be so kind as to point that out, but probably won't.

[lyman]

so why bring up southern? does it not apply to those above the Mason Dixon line as well?

[togor]

so why bring up southern? does it not apply to those above the Mason Dixon line as well?

Not southern, rather NC, Clark's reported state. The NC GOP is among the worst of the state parties of either flavor these days when it comes to going to all lengths to maximize its power. Judges slap them down and they just hatch some new scheme. Their intent is to destroy the common enterprise of NC State government and replace it with a one party monopoly. One party states always bring massive corruption because political parties themselves are full of cronyism.

[Vern Humphrey]

so why bring up southern? does it not apply to those above the Mason Dixon line as well?

Because he's a bigot, of course!! Switch "Southern" in his post to "Black" and see how it reads.

[togor]

Because he's a bigot, of course!! Switch "Southern" in his post to "Black" and see how it reads.

Ad hominem attack from someone who doesn't even read my post. Moderators are meant for moments like this.

[lyman]

Ad hominem attack from someone who doesn't even read my post. Moderators are meant for moments like this.

as a Southerner,,, I probably should let it slide, knowing you history here,,


however, Vern,, please play nice

happy now togor?

[togor]

as a Southerner,,, I probably should let it slide, knowing you history here,,


however, Vern,, please play nice

happy now togor?

You volunteered for the position, and I acknowledge your action here.

To the point: My history? The way I see it those select few who express sympathy towards the memory of the Confederacy, a government which waged war on my country, are the ones with the history problem. Is that Southerners in general, black or white? Most certainly not. Those who it does include know who they are.