Bloomberg News Announces It Will Not Investigate Mike Bloomberg,

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11268

    #1

    Bloomberg News Announces It Will Not Investigate Mike Bloomberg,

    Seems fair,,,





    Bloomberg News Announces It Will Not Investigate Mike Bloomberg, Or Any Of His Democratic Rivals


    and

    On the other hand, while Bloomberg News will no longer cover any of the potential Democratic presidents, period, its "P&I team will continue to investigate the Trump administration, as the government of the day", albeit with the running disclaimer that its boss sees himself as Trump's biggest challenger
  • Vern Humphrey
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 15875

    #2
    Who says the press is impartial?

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      The key is transparency. Russia Today is slick propaganda masquerading as news, but for the most part the viewership knows what "RT" means as an acronym. Same for Fox which reflects the editorial standards of its owner. If Bloomberg News is letting folks know where they stand, that's fine. And as long as any of them are reporting objective facts, then the source doesn't matter. What I don't like is the covert disinformation, the ginning up of pure BS overseas and feeding it to low information viewers here through facades.

      Comment

      • bruce
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 3759

        #4
        Bloomberg News Announces It Will Not Investigate Mike Bloomberg, Or Any Of His Democratic Rivals.
        This is not news. It is just common knowledge. Sincerely. bruce.
        " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

        Comment

        • Vern Humphrey
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 15875

          #5
          Originally posted by bruce
          Bloomberg News Announces It Will Not Investigate Mike Bloomberg, Or Any Of His Democratic Rivals.
          This is not news. It is just common knowledge. Sincerely. bruce.

          What IS news is that they actually admit it.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
            What IS news is that they actually admit it.
            Transparency comes as a shock to some people.

            Comment

            • Roadkingtrax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 7835

              #7
              Originally posted by togor
              Transparency comes as a shock to some people.
              How is it any different than weaponizing a tabloid like the Enquirer?
              "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

              Comment

              • RED
                Very Senior Member - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 11689

                #8
                Originally posted by togor
                What I don't like is the covert disinformation, the ginning up of pure BS overseas and feeding it to low information viewers here through facades.

                Every viewer here is a low information viewer according to togor except for the 3 annointied ones. The Rosenbergs were executed because they were spies. If we were to start executing spies again, there would be a bunch of very well known folks on the list... DJT would head the list with every other patriotic supporter of America, freedom, and the Constitution.

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610

                  #9
                  So Red you see yourself as a Russian dupe? "Here" means USA to me. What does it mean to you?

                  Comment

                  • dryheat
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 10587

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                    What IS news is that they actually admit it.
                    Surprisingly, I think you nailed exactly what I thought. Wait, they are all so holy, what would there be to investigate?
                    If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                    Comment

                    • Vern Humphrey
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 15875

                      #11
                      Originally posted by dryheat
                      Surprisingly, I think you nailed exactly what I thought. Wait, they are all so holy, what would there be to investigate?
                      This is called Clintonian Antinomianism -- He's so moral that everything he does is highly moral because if it weren't, a highly moral person like him wouldn't be doing it.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                        This is called Clintonian Antinomianism -- He's so moral that everything he does is highly moral because if it weren't, a highly moral person like him wouldn't be doing it.
                        I thought Trump had the "best morals". No?

                        Comment

                        • m1ashooter
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2011
                          • 3220

                          #13
                          The control of the message to the masses is as old as time itself. Those who are in power don't want the serfs to thing for themselves.
                          To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

                          Comment

                          • Vern Humphrey
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 15875

                            #14
                            Originally posted by m1ashooter
                            The control of the message to the masses is as old as time itself. Those who are in power don't want the serfs to thing for themselves.
                            If they were allowed to think for themselves, they might think "How come all these rich people in Congress don't pay THEIR fair share?"

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                              If they were allowed to think for themselves, they might think "How come all these rich people in Congress don't pay THEIR fair share?"
                              Or they might think things like "how come my health care is so damn expensive?" or "why is it that Trump has so many nice things to say about some pretty awful dictators?" or "how come we can't do something about all of these #$%@! guns?"

                              As a rule, people thinking for themselves is exactly what the reactionaries seek to prevent.

                              Comment

                              Working...