No need to take the Oath if you're a democrat ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    No need to take the Oath if you're a democrat ...

    which of course means they can extend their noses Pinocchio style
    as much as needed in order to please Nadler.
    Funny how the democrats no longer bother trying to hide their lying.

    Pengeluaran hk dan keluaran hk prize hari ini tercepat di result ke tabel data hk pools 2021 dalam pasaran togel hongkong dijamin akurat
  • jjrothWA
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 1148

    #2
    Has no meaning to demo-rats!

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #3
      Point well taken -- laws, the Constitution and oaths have no meaning for Democrats.

      Comment

      • JohnMOhio
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 1545

        #4
        Considering all the lies, what if, (this is speculation) the whistle blower is non existent. That he was made up by the chief lair Shiftee. (spelling?) I remember hearing the complaint made by the whistle blower read as if an attorney wrote it. If this is all true, it explains why they did not want him to testify and wanted to keep his/her identity secret. If they go to trial in the Senate, I would expect there would be pressure to have him/her to testify. They can then verify any contact with Shiftee and or his staff and what if any part they played in the writing of the letter supposedly written by the whistle blower.
        Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
        Author unkown.

        Comment

        • dogtag
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 14985

          #5
          Originally posted by JohnMOhio
          Considering all the lies, what if, (this is speculation) the whistle blower is non existent. That he was made up by the chief lair Shiftee. (spelling?) I remember hearing the complaint made by the whistle blower read as if an attorney wrote it. If this is all true, it explains why they did not want him to testify and wanted to keep his/her identity secret. If they go to trial in the Senate, I would expect there would be pressure to have him/her to testify. They can then verify any contact with Shiftee and or his staff and what if any part they played in the writing of the letter supposedly written by the whistle blower.
          I thought about that a while back, but if that turned out to be true
          Schiff would be censured, maybe tossed out. He might be a bug-eyed
          lying moron, but he couldn't possibly be that stupid.

          Comment

          • Vern Humphrey
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 15875

            #6
            Originally posted by dogtag
            I thought about that a while back, but if that turned out to be true
            Schiff would be censured, maybe tossed out. He might be a bug-eyed
            lying moron, but he couldn't possibly be that stupid.
            He's real -- he's a Democrat activist with close ties to Pelosi and others.

            Comment

            • JohnMOhio
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 1545

              #7
              Would the Democrats possibly dupe him and then turn on him to reach their goal of getting at Trump. I wouldn't put it past Nancy and Chuck to do so. The power of controlling the "sword" and the "purse." Only the wealthy will rule.

              After all, they took the oath to support the Constitution yet they repeatedly have sought to systematically dismember the 2nd Amendment a small slice at a time to the point it would no longer be valid.
              Last edited by JohnMOhio; 12-14-2019, 04:26.
              Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
              Author unkown.

              Comment

              Working...