Democratic male reproduction law proposed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #16
    Originally posted by jdmcgrath
    Contraception for women who don't want to get pregnant.
    A good choice.....if used...

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #17
      Originally posted by jdmcgrath
      A bad understanding of biology makes for bad law. Fertilized embryos might become people, or just miscarry. Calling embryos people invites womb police to investigate every miscarriage as a homicide.
      That's a form of processed meat (bologna). There's no need for any of that hysteria. Just recognize that abortion is murder.

      Comment

      • Dolt
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 543

        #18
        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
        Like it or not, the premeditated killing of a perfectly innocent human being is called murder. We all have a stake in preventing and punishing murder.
        Pro abortionists call themselves "Pro-choice". But they need to keep in mind that they have several choices before resorting to murdering a baby. They have they CHOICE not to have sex, they have the CHOICE to use contraception if they have sex. They have the CHOICE to give their unwanted baby human being up for adoption if they don't want it. They have plenty of choices other than murder. I always figured a woman who would murder her baby would have been a lousy mother anyway.
        Read, think, UNDERSTAND, comment

        Comment

        • S.A. Boggs
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 8579

          #19
          Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
          That's a form of processed meat (bologna). There's no need for any of that hysteria. Just recognize that abortion is murder.
          Weren't another brand of National Socialist hung after World War Two for murdering children under the law of their defeated country? Under there country's law it was legal to murder babies. What is the difference then and now???
          Sam

          Comment

          • jdmcgrath
            Banned
            • Aug 2017
            • 75

            #20
            "Just recognize that abortion is murder".

            Having said that, it follows that an illegal termination of a pregnancy must be prosecuted as murder, including all accomplices. Now pregnancy is a matter for state supervision and possibly a criminal matter. The problem with policy from dogma is that the cure is worse than the disease.

            Comment

            • S.A. Boggs
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 8579

              #21
              Originally posted by jdmcgrath
              "Just recognize that abortion is murder".

              Having said that, it follows that an illegal termination of a pregnancy must be prosecuted as murder, including all accomplices. Now pregnancy is a matter for state supervision and possibly a criminal matter. The problem with policy from dogma is that the cure is worse than the disease.
              Elaboration.
              Sam

              Comment

              • jdmcgrath
                Banned
                • Aug 2017
                • 75

                #22
                Someone who sees a positive test after one missed period in the same light as a belly 8 months ripe has no business writing these laws. Reducing abortions is a worthy goal but not through bad biology or criminalizing adverse pregnancy outcomes or just flat out ignoring the woman's constitutional rights. Last thing a woman with a miscarriage needs is a cop asking her what foods she ate or for a vial of her blood. Once such laws are written justice will be both blind and dumb which is the last thing anyone but a true dogmatic should want.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11296

                  #23
                  Originally posted by jdmcgrath
                  Someone who sees a positive test after one missed period in the same light as a belly 8 months ripe has no business writing these laws. Reducing abortions is a worthy goal but not through bad biology or criminalizing adverse pregnancy outcomes or just flat out ignoring the woman's constitutional rights. Last thing a woman with a miscarriage needs is a cop asking her what foods she ate or for a vial of her blood. Once such laws are written justice will be both blind and dumb which is the last thing anyone but a true dogmatic should want.
                  not to mention the back alley abortions etc etc,



                  abortion has left the barn, left the corral, gone across the pasture and is well into the wind several counties over, ,but folks still think they can put that horse back in the stall ,,,



                  fact is , it is more polarizing than even gun control,

                  I doubt there will ever be a consensus on when life starts, and when it is allowed to terminate (abort) it,

                  Comment

                  • Vern Humphrey
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 15875

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Dolt
                    Pro abortionists call themselves "Pro-choice". But they need to keep in mind that they have several choices before resorting to murdering a baby. They have they CHOICE not to have sex, they have the CHOICE to use contraception if they have sex. They have the CHOICE to give their unwanted baby human being up for adoption if they don't want it. They have plenty of choices other than murder. I always figured a woman who would murder her baby would have been a lousy mother anyway.
                    I had a person say to me, "We're pro-choice. You must be anti-choice."

                    I replied, "We're pro-life. You must be anti-life."

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by jdmcgrath
                    Someone who sees a positive test after one missed period in the same light as a belly 8 months ripe has no business writing these laws. Reducing abortions is a worthy goal but not through bad biology or criminalizing adverse pregnancy outcomes or just flat out ignoring the woman's constitutional rights. Last thing a woman with a miscarriage needs is a cop asking her what foods she ate or for a vial of her blood. Once such laws are written justice will be both blind and dumb which is the last thing anyone but a true dogmatic should want.
                    The sky is falling! The sky is falling! If we don't have abortion on demand, all our cops will be asking women with a miscarriages what foods they ate!! It'll happen, I tell you, it'll happen!
                    Last edited by Vern Humphrey; 02-19-2020, 02:18.

                    Comment

                    • Roadkingtrax
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 7835

                      #25
                      Vern, he's exactly right. Religious dogma has clouded your understanding of law.
                      "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                      Comment

                      • blackhawknj
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 3754

                        #26
                        There is no "man's right to choose", and the rest of us have to pick up the tab for welfare, schools, prisons, etc. And of course the abortion rate in this country is as high as it is because the group most committed to "reproductive freedom for women " is-men.
                        And if you want to see unwanted and loved children, visit the financial aid office of a college or university, when the divorced children are asked where are the financial disclosure form from their fathers, their reply is usually:
                        "My parents divorced when I was -- years old and we never heard from him again."
                        Last edited by blackhawknj; 02-19-2020, 04:13.

                        Comment

                        • Vern Humphrey
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 15875

                          #27
                          Originally posted by blackhawknj
                          There is no "man's right to choose", and the rest of us have to pick up the tab for welfare, schools, prisons, etc. And of course the abortion rate in this country is as high as it is because the group most committed to "reproductive freedom for women " is-men.
                          And if you want to see unwanted and loved children, visit the financial aid office of a college or university, when the divorced children are asked where are the financial disclosure form from their fathers, their reply is usually:
                          "My parents divorced when I was -- years old and we never heard from him again."
                          The abandonment of a child by its father is, of course, the male equivalent of an abortion -- and is nearly as reprehensible as murder

                          Comment

                          • S.A. Boggs
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 8579

                            #28
                            Originally posted by blackhawknj
                            There is no "man's right to choose", and the rest of us have to pick up the tab for welfare, schools, prisons, etc. And of course the abortion rate in this country is as high as it is because the group most committed to "reproductive freedom for women " is-men.
                            And if you want to see unwanted and loved children, visit the financial aid office of a college or university, when the divorced children are asked where are the financial disclosure form from their fathers, their reply is usually:
                            "My parents divorced when I was -- years old and we never heard from him again."
                            I dealt with too many adults who had a crying child inside them still in need of many things. I have also seen children who's mother abused ethanol or other drugs, these children had no chance yet have their life to live. If a woman chooses to kill the child shouldn't the father have some say? Would it be just as "right" if the mother wanted to keep the child yet the father demanded the child's death?
                            Which one of you will vote for life or death of a child?
                            Sam

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #29
                              Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                              I dealt with too many adults who had a crying child inside them still in need of many things. I have also seen children who's mother abused ethanol or other drugs, these children had no chance yet have their life to live. If a woman chooses to kill the child shouldn't the father have some say? Would it be just as "right" if the mother wanted to keep the child yet the father demanded the child's death?
                              Which one of you will vote for life or death of a child?
                              Sam
                              For that matter, what if the mother wanted to kill the father, or vice-versa? What about a teenager -- those who have raised teenagers will understand what I mean.

                              Comment

                              • RED
                                Very Senior Member - OFC
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 11689

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                                For that matter, what if the mother wanted to kill the father, or vice-versa? What about a teenager -- those who have raised teenagers will understand what I mean.
                                I'm tired of hearing from people that are for unlimited immigration because Americans aren't having enough babies. When at the same time they support and encourage American women to have 650,000 abortions per year.

                                Comment

                                Working...