SCOTUS to decide if democrat electors are allowed cheat ...

[dogtag]

It seems that if the all-powerful Electors decide they don't like
the Candidate the people have chosen via their votes, then
they can ignore the result and choose whoever they like.
That would allow them to choose their Wife, or even worse
Bill's Wife ?

https://www.wnd.com/2020/02/major-le...lection-chaos/

Democrats are extremely creative when it comes to cheating.
They are masters of the art.

[Vern Humphrey]

Not likely. Each party puts up a slate of electors, and if your state goes Republican, the Republican electors cast your states' ballots.

[dogtag]

Not likely. Each party puts up a slate of electors, and if your state goes Republican, the Republican electors cast your states' ballots.

Oh, you're privy to the SCOTUS decision already ?

[Vern Humphrey]

Oh, you're privy to the SCOTUS decision already ?

Excuse me? The court decision is not going to change the fact that there is a slate of electors for EACH candidate. The court decision is not going to suddenly convert Republican electors into Democrats.

[dogtag]

Excuse me? The court decision is not going to change the fact that there is a slate of electors for EACH candidate. The court decision is not going to suddenly convert Republican electors into Democrats.

We're talking about if they can vote for anyone they choose.
It's only the democrats who cheat so brazenly.

[Vern Humphrey]

We're talking about if they can vote for anyone they choose.
It's only the democrats who cheat so brazenly.

And how is the court decision going to MAKE them vote against the party that put them up?

[dogtag]

And how is the court decision going to MAKE them vote against the party that put them up?

For instance; If Bernie wins in say Colorado the Electors are legally bound to cast their lot for him.
However, the Electors want the law changed in order to choose someone else in spite of the vote

[Vern Humphrey]

For instance; If Bernie wins in say Colorado the Electors are legally bound to cast their lot for him.
However, the Electors want the law changed in order to choose someone else in spite of the vote

But how is that going to MAKE them vote against the party that put them up?

It strikes me it's the party's job to put up a slate of reliable electors, court decision or not.

[dogtag]

But how is that going to MAKE them vote against the party that put them up?

It strikes me it's the party's job to put up a slate of reliable electors, court decision or not.

I assume the 'Party' is in on it. Maybe to get rid of Bernie ?

[Vern Humphrey]

I assume the 'Party' is in on it. Maybe to get rid of Bernie ?

There you may be right. But it's the Party, not the courts doing the dirty work.