Tweet
Cities and organizations are banning meetings, rallies, etc,
which seems like a random, if not futile attempt at control.
One place has banned crowds of over 250. That would seem
to imply that the 250 will be virus free but the 251st will be
infected. How do they know that ? Silicon Valley on the other
hand is banning crowds of over 1000. Same logic applies
only on a larger scale. All it takes is one person who's infected,
but who's to know who or where that person is ? If you're
going to ban then ban groups of two as that seems to be the
surest way of preventing the spread.
Banning groups of one might be overdoing it.
which seems like a random, if not futile attempt at control.
One place has banned crowds of over 250. That would seem
to imply that the 250 will be virus free but the 251st will be
infected. How do they know that ? Silicon Valley on the other
hand is banning crowds of over 1000. Same logic applies
only on a larger scale. All it takes is one person who's infected,
but who's to know who or where that person is ? If you're
going to ban then ban groups of two as that seems to be the
surest way of preventing the spread.
Banning groups of one might be overdoing it.
Comment