Read the people comments on the Daily Mail w/ Brits criticizing Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #31
    RT posts...Real simple. You're mad at public comments, made on a British tabloid website, seen as not favorable to Donald Trump?

    News Flash! Americans are the biggest proponent of American Exceptionalism. Europeans may not agree with you, your political choices, or your leadership's comments on any or all subjects you care deeply about. The 4th of July comment was merely poking fun at that.
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman


    Gee you sound just like togor..... lol
    Last edited by rayg; 04-26-2020, 02:28.

    Comment

    • rayg
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 7444

      #32
      Sand pp posts.., So... when Donald Trump expressed to the entire world his thoughts that half of it were "xxxx hole" countries you applauded with a big OOhRAH !

      I mean.... you were OK with that right ?

      And now you take offense.... we're strong enough to give it and to weak and whiny to take it ? .... just asking

      I never said any thing about it, It's all in your fantasy mind...Lol
      Last edited by rayg; 04-26-2020, 02:31.

      Comment

      • Roadkingtrax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 7835

        #33
        Originally posted by rayg


        Gee you sound just like togor..... lol


        Originally posted by rayg
        The Trump show is cancelled! President WALKS OUT of coronavirus briefing after 22 minutes and refuses to take questions after his disinfectant disaster as White House looks to 'cut back his daily updates'

        There's no question but that the DM is anti Trump.. but I guess what really burns me up is the personal anti Trump remarks in the comment section by British posters. I guess I feel American politics is American's business not theirs..
        Am I wrong? or being overly critical?.


        Read the remarks...

        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-disaster.html

        Are you suggesting the President isn't free to express his opinion? The same privilege you don't extend to the individual contributors of the DailyMail comment section?

        To your highlighted comment above, why take such personal offense to negative comments about Trump? It's as if you have taken on his identity to feel that way.
        Last edited by Roadkingtrax; 04-25-2020, 02:41.
        "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

        Comment

        • rayg
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 7444

          #34
          The posts I'm talking about are the ones made by non US citizens and you know it that is who I mean, don't try to dance around it.....

          Comment

          • Sandpebble
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2017
            • 2196

            #35
            Originally posted by rayg
            Sand pp, So... when Donald Trump expressed to the entire world his thoughts that half of it were "xxxx hole" countries you applauded with a big OOhRAH !

            I mean.... you were OK with that right ?

            And now you take offense.... we're strong enough to give it and to weak and whiny to take it ? .... just asking

            Never said any thing about it, It's all in your fantasy mind...Lol
            So Ray... please inform my Fantasy Mind ... are you agreeing with me that Trump was wrong to insult other nations by calling them xxxx hole countries.... or not ?

            Comment

            • clintonhater
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2015
              • 5220

              #36
              Originally posted by Sandpebble
              So... when Donald Trump expressed to the entire world his thoughts that half of it were "xxxx hole" countries you applauded with a big OOhRAH !

              I mean.... you were OK with that right ?
              I don't know about him, but I was. And the tens of millions trying their best to get the hell out of those countries, invading Europe & this country, must also agree, or they wouldn't risk their lives in dangerous ocean crossings.

              Comment

              • Vern Humphrey
                Administrator - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 15875

                #37
                Originally posted by clintonhater
                I don't know about him, but I was. And the tens of millions trying their best to get the hell out of those countries, invading Europe & this country, must also agree, or they wouldn't risk their lives in dangerous ocean crossings.
                I've been in those countries. I've LIVED in some. There's an old saying, "The first step in solving a problem is realizing that you have a problem."

                The second step is defining the problem. And for many of those countries, the problem is that they're xxxxhole countries.

                Comment

                • clintonhater
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 5220

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                  And for many of those countries, the problem is that they're xxxxhole countries.
                  But not, actually, when their economies were efficiently managed by European colonial administrations, as when Zimbabwe, now a basket case, was the "breadbasket of Africa." Don't tell me how oppressive the colonial administration was unless you can explain why most of the population was willing, however discontented they may have been, to stay where they were rather than risk their lives to escape to Europe.

                  Comment

                  • Vern Humphrey
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 15875

                    #39
                    Originally posted by clintonhater
                    But not, actually, when their economies were efficiently managed by European colonial administrations, as when Zimbabwe, now a basket case, was the "breadbasket of Africa." Don't tell me how oppressive the colonial administration was unless you can explain why most of the population was willing, however discontented they may have been, to stay where they were rather than risk their lives to escape to Europe.
                    You're making my point -- many of those countries were once prosperous, and turned themselves into xxxxholes, usually in the pursuit of ideological nonsense.

                    Comment

                    • lyman
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 11295

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                      You're making my point -- many of those countries were once prosperous, and turned themselves into xxxxholes, usually in the pursuit of ideological nonsense.
                      in the country mentioned, that Ideological nonsense was simply a power grab by a dictator masquerading as a socialist, or communist, or whatever, and a lot of kill the white man,

                      granted, the kill the white man part may have been because of the way the white man governed or worked there,,


                      however, you would think the native population would have learned to farm,

                      but then again, one way to gain control is to indoctrinate not educate,

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #41
                        Rule #1 of conquering--

                        Eliminate the traditional governance structure that was in place before the takeover.

                        Replace it with something that serves the interests of the occupiers. A common device is to create factions of competing interests among the locals, thereby reinforcing the occupying power and preventing unified opposition.


                        It comes as no surprise then that post colonial governments struggle to find their footing, possibly for a very long time. Europe was a bunch of sh*thole countries for centuries after Roman decline. Eastern Europe still is, in the post-Czarist/Soviet era.

                        Comment

                        • clintonhater
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2015
                          • 5220

                          #42
                          Originally posted by lyman
                          but then again, one way to gain control is to indoctrinate not educate,
                          Just as in this country. Check out the websites of the two main teacher's unions, & try to find any substantial difference between them & the policies of the DNC. During the last election there was NO difference whatever--they were both full-speed-ahead Hillary machines.

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #43
                            Originally posted by clintonhater
                            Just as in this country. Check out the websites of the two main teacher's unions, & try to find any substantial difference between them & the policies of the DNC. During the last election there was NO difference whatever--they were both full-speed-ahead Hillary machines.
                            Proof of nothing.

                            Yeah teachers unions on your enemies list but so what.

                            Comment

                            • lyman
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 11295

                              #44
                              Originally posted by togor
                              Rule #1 of conquering--

                              Eliminate the traditional governance structure that was in place before the takeover.

                              Replace it with something that serves the interests of the occupiers. A common device is to create factions of competing interests among the locals, thereby reinforcing the occupying power and preventing unified opposition.


                              It comes as no surprise then that post colonial governments struggle to find their footing, possibly for a very long time. Europe was a bunch of sh*thole countries for centuries after Roman decline. Eastern Europe still is, in the post-Czarist/Soviet era.

                              compared to ???


                              if you are going to lay at a claim like that in the past,, then provide some context,

                              Comment

                              • togor
                                Banned
                                • Nov 2009
                                • 17610

                                #45
                                If you want to argue against a context, or for one, then pick one and start typing. Nothing stopping you.

                                - - - Updated - - -

                                But, by way of low hanging fruit, scholars call the 1,000 years after the fall of the Greco-Roman Empire in the west the Dark Ages.

                                Comment

                                Working...