Good Weekend For The Trump Boys

[Roadkingtrax]

fify

Thanks?

[togor]

Thanks?

"Both sides" as a stock reply has a history now.

[Roadkingtrax]

"Both sides" as a stock reply has a history now.

All bridge jumpers. No personal accountability.

[rayg]

Why not? You're too good to do a Google search? I've given you the primary sources. If you're going to argue the Trump boys aren't doing these things, you too have a burden of proof.

Made it up huh!...If you can't copy or name the source! then that makes it look like you could have made it up..

[togor]

Made it up huh!...If you can't copy or name the source! then that makes it look like you could have made it up..

You shouldn't need me to cut your meat for you.

1. go to www.google.com

2. paste in the following search phrase: "fox news eric trump rallies"

3. click on the Fox result below, and navigate to watch the interview.

4. read other accounts returned in the search to contrast/compare.


5. go back to www.google.com

6. paste in the following text: "don jr instagram pedophile"

7. navigate results as necessary, including the image results.

You'll get better with practice.

BTW, you regularly ding forum members for language less childish than Jr's. Curious to see if you will criticize his post or label it as "good old fashioned light humor".

[rayg]

Well You provided a bunch of steps I have to take me to confirm what you said. Why can't you just go directly to it to show me where you got the information from. You're the one who said it. why is it my responsibility to confirm what you said. That's not the way it works..

[Vern Humphrey]

Made it up huh!...If you can't copy or name the source! then that makes it look like you could have made it up..

What he's saying is the burden of proof is no longer on the accuser. If you can't prove you're innocent, then you're guilty.

[togor]

Well You provided a bunch of steps I have to take me to confirm what you said. Why can't you just go directly to it to show me where you got the information from. You're the one who said it. why is it my responsibility to confirm what you said. That's not the way it works..

Well Ray I gave you the Instagram screen shot.

The issue with links is that if you don't like the story you reject MY link on the reason of bias.

Eric's Fox News clip is easy to find.

- - - Updated - - -

What he's saying is the burden of proof is no longer on the accuser. If you can't prove you're innocent, then you're guilty.

No. You should read my posts if you want to know what I'm saying.

Something so simple, you can't even figure that out!!!!

[clintonhater]

What he's saying is the burden of proof is no longer on the accuser. If you can't prove you're innocent, then you're guilty.

Well, why not? That's become the "new standard" for burden of proof when unproven charges of sexual misconduct are made by women against men. (Though there are exceptions, as when your name is Joe Biden.)

[Vern Humphrey]

You nailed it -- our resident liberals are up to snuff. "You gotta prove we're wrong. We doan got to show you no steenkin' proof."

[lyman]

"Both sides" as a stock reply has a history now.

only when you argue that side A is truly the one doing whatever trigger you,, and it is actually both Side A and Side B, with Side C thinking if they can get away with it,


but you keep on believing, it gives you hope and makes you feel warm and fuzzy I'm sure,