More proof there's no election fraud.

[Vern Humphrey]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2...k-charged-alt/

As out resident liberals have assured us, there's no election fraud in this country.

[clintonhater]

No doubt this story is going to be fully reported & analyzed by PBS, CNN, etc.; you think?

Something tells me Shrerikia needn't loose any sleep over going before a Detroit jury. It will only be surprising if she doesn't win another award for her "good work" on behalf of the party.

[Vern Humphrey]

No doubt this story is going to be fully reported & analyzed by PBS, CNN, etc.; you think?

Something tells me Shrerikia needn't loose any sleep over going before a Detroit jury. It will only be surprising if she doesn't win another award for her "good work" on behalf of the party.

Maybe some of our liberals will offer to bet you're wrong.

[togor]

How about we ban elections altogether because there is noise in the measurement? Is that better?

200 votes, and they caught her, out of how many cast? And how does 200 stack up against the other sources of errors?

Yes let's pass more laws because if even one bad vote is in there it ruins the entire election, but only if the wrong candidate wins!

Some arguments are blatantly transparent.

[clintonhater]

Some arguments are blatantly transparent.

Starting with yours, which is that a "mere" 200 doesn't matter. Poor Sheirkia was unlucky enough to be caught; think there aren't others who got away with it?

[kj47]

200 votes is 200 votes. Can make a differance.

[Roadkingtrax]

Maybe some of our liberals will offer to bet you're wrong.

Hypocrisy.

[togor]

Starting with yours, which is that a "mere" 200 doesn't matter. Poor Sheirkia was unlucky enough to be caught; think there aren't others who got away with it?

In extremely close contests it can matter, and then there are recounts, and careful scrutiny of ballots. Let us not forget this woman was caught.

But if the margin is 100X or 10000X larger, then no, it does not affect the outcome. To suggest otherwise is to think the way liberals do about gun control--eliminate all bad sales, if not the guns themselves, regardless of what burdens that places on honest people.

I say again, to some a close election defeat to a Liberal, however minor the office, is infinitely worse than the worst possible mass shooting anyone can imagine. Thus we can stop at nothing to modify election laws so Liberals win as seldom as humanly possible. I believe that states the position correctly.

[Vern Humphrey]

200 votes is 200 votes. Can make a differance.

Given that there are over 3.000 counties (or equivalent) in the US, 200 fraudulent votes times 3,000 counties would amount to 600,000 fraudulent votes.

[togor]

Given that there are over 3.000 counties (or equivalent) in the US, 200 fraudulent votes times 3,000 counties would amount to 600,000 fraudulent votes.

Meaningless.

[jcg&jmbfan]

Off topic, but for the first time ever on any forum, I put someone, make that two, people on ignore. Will see how long it lasts. Carry on guys!

Edited to add, make that three.

[JOHN COOK]

Putting them on ignore..... It will make no difference, there are members who love to copy and paste. I am almost to the point to ignore two more..
John in SC

[lyman]

togor says, Meaningless


so, is fraud fraud, or is there a number of votes or a percentage that makes it ok?

[Roadkingtrax]

Using ignore is weak.

[togor]

On topic....Trump mischaracterizes on Twitter what Michigan is doing and vaguely threatens to withhold funding from Michigan unless they do what he wants, re: mail-in ballots.

We know why Trump wants to curb mail in ballots, and it has nothing to do with fraud, and everything to do with turnout. GOP operatives have been caught on mic: suppressing turnout is central to their election strategy. The further proof is he has no qualms about mail in ballots in solidly red states.

There's a better way: expand voting access, and compete for the voters who are out there. "But that would mean we'd have to increase the size of our coalition, champion new issues that some voters want." Yes, it would.