The very last straw...

[lyman]

I do not believe that a majority of Trump voters think the way forward lies through deliberate and ongoing antagonism over past injustices. I could be wrong.

- - - Updated - - -



So resolving things peacefully is a now liberal cause? Boy the path of rightousness gets narrower every day.

liberals have not been to peaceful lately


quite the opposite

[togor]

liberals have not been to peaceful lately


quite the opposite

Who have they killed?

[lyman]

Who have they killed?

well, 1 in
Portsmouth, , seems the statue kilt him,


chicago seems to get a couple dozen a week,,,,

[clintonhater]

Who have they killed?

Not who, but what, & the answer is...the rule of law; more important by far than the miserable life of a career criminal, who'd probably have met his end in a drug deal gone bag, or another armed robbery, if the cop's knee hadn't got him first.

[lyman]

Who have they killed?

hmmm


few seconds on google


https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimam.../#6d777f4de4f1

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/u...rest-toll.html

[togor]

Those are all Liberal deaths? Pity you could not have taken a few more seconds to actually read. Recurring problem.

[lyman]

Those are all Liberal deaths? Pity you could not have taken a few more seconds to actually read. Recurring problem.

some are some are not,


pity you can't see the point that any death is bad, as is the destruction,


real pity, makes you look petty

[togor]

some are some are not,


pity I can't see the point that any death is bad, as is the destruction,


real pity, makes me look petty

FIFY

I posted about the boogaloo boys taking out the LEOs in CA, and your reply was....<shrug>

Same as it is for every right wing killing. Sad. You only count the bodies that benefit your side.

My side is anti-extremist both ways, so I count them all as a problem.

I've said this before, will say it again: the side that practices the most restraint will win.

Restraint = anti-killing, anti-destruction, in case that wasn't clear.

[clintonhater]

I've said this before, will say it again: the side that practices the most restraint will win.

Restraint = anti-killing, anti-destruction, in case that wasn't clear.

If that were true, the anarchy & destruction of BLM would be earning them universal condemnation instead of celebration by the pandering media & Dems. The more destructive & outrageous their criminal behavior, the faster the PC world is caving in to placate them.

[Vern Humphrey]

hmmm


few seconds on google


https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimam.../#6d777f4de4f1

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/u...rest-toll.html

But that doesn't fit the liberal narrative, so to him it didn't happen.

[lyman]

FIFY

I posted about the boogaloo boys taking out the LEOs in CA, and your reply was....<shrug>

Same as it is for every right wing killing. Sad. You only count the bodies that benefit your side.

My side is anti-extremist both ways, so I count them all as a problem.

I've said this before, will say it again: the side that practices the most restraint will win.

Restraint = anti-killing, anti-destruction, in case that wasn't clear.

you always want to pick a side, usually the lesser, and then claim to be the great one of all knowledge, or pity me the underdog, someone is picking on me,

those 2 links showed PEOPLE being killed and wounded, as well as property destruction,

Pity YOU are so blinded by whatever hood you wear that you can't see that,

protest all you want, pick up a bottle or brick and your point just went south,

so restraint,, your side ain't showing it

[Vern Humphrey]

you always want to pick a side, usually the lesser, and then claim to be the great one of all knowledge, or pity me the underdog, someone is picking on me,

those 2 links showed PEOPLE being killed and wounded, as well as property destruction,

Pity YOU are so blinded by whatever hood you wear that you can't see that,

protest all you want, pick up a bottle or brick and your point just went south,

so restraint,, your side ain't showing it

It's strange he can't see this. It appears his vision of America is we SHOULD be divided and at war with each other.

[togor]

you always want to pick a side, usually the lesser, and then claim to be the great one of all knowledge, or pity me the underdog, someone is picking on me,

those 2 links showed PEOPLE being killed and wounded, as well as property destruction,

Pity YOU are so blinded by whatever hood you wear that you can't see that,

protest all you want, pick up a bottle or brick and your point just went south,

so restraint,, your side ain't showing it

Way too many assumptions.

As someone who spends a lot of time online, you should understand the limits of the medium, especially when difficult subjects come up.

Seems to me like you default to assumptions. I remind you of someone you met, so you take everything that way.

I can say the same about you. But I try to remember that I've never met you.

Here's a challenge. Try exchanging posts without hanging labels on people, like Fudd, Liberal, etc.

Mostly I think you just like trolling me. You seldom make the effort to post to any depth, just scan and jump on something, usually incorrectly. I'll admit you're good at it, but I can adapt.

One of the tolerable things about Red is that as ill-tempered as he can be, he takes a shot at it once in awhile. Doesn't just sit back.

[lyman]

Way too many assumptions.

As someone who spends a lot of time online, you should understand the limits of the medium, especially when difficult subjects come up.

Seems to me like you default to assumptions. I remind you of someone you met, so you take everything that way.

I can say the same about you. But I try to remember that I've never met you.

Here's a challenge. Try exchanging posts without hanging labels on people, like Fudd, Liberal, etc.

Mostly I think you just like trolling me. You seldom make the effort to post to any depth, just scan and jump on something, usually incorrectly. I'll admit you're good at it, but I can adapt.

One of the tolerable things about Red is that as ill-tempered as he can be, he takes a shot at it once in awhile. Doesn't just sit back.

you comment on someone making assumption, the make an assumption yourself,


would it be too much for you to admit you are incorrect? or actually answer a question asked instead of diversions, or as your pal RED says, twist and turn?


some questions posed to you have deep answers, they just don't fit your narrative, so you assume folks stay on the shallow end,


as far as troll,,,, ,,