The wisdom of Democrat's always cost more taxpayer money

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #1

    The wisdom of Democrat's always cost more taxpayer money

    The wisdom of Democrat's always cost more taxpayer money as AOC defends rise in NYC crime saying people are 'stealing bread to feed their children during record unemployment' despite weeks of bloodshed and 130% surge in shooting

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was speaking during a virtual town hall last Thursday
    Commenting on the recent crime spike across NYC AOC said: 'Do we think this has to do with the fact that there’s record unemployment in the US right now?'

    Police data shows shootings in the city last month were up 130% year on year
    Mayor Bill de Blasio said in June he was slashing $1 billion from the NYPD budget

    Record unemployment everywhere yet everyone isn't looting stores to get 'bread'

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-children.html
  • Johnny P
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 6258

    #2
    Here we are over 55 years into LBJ's "Great Society". We sure have come a long way.

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #3
      Originally posted by Johnny P
      Here we are over 55 years into LBJ's "Great Society". We sure have come a long way.
      If I could name the real problem, it's the "Great Society." We -- and especially those of us who are Democrats -- aren't smart enough to meddle with the fundamentals of society.

      Comment

      • Johnny P
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 6258

        #4
        The cornerstone of the Great Society was:

        Ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequity, and improving the environment.

        Comment

        • Gun Smoke
          Banned
          • Sep 2019
          • 1658

          #5
          Originally posted by Johnny P
          The cornerstone of the Great Society was:

          Ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequity, and improving the environment.
          Looks like a couple of key words must have been dropped or twisted since everything turned out the opposite.

          The real purpose was to increase the black population and thus provide assured democrat election victories for all eternity.

          Comment

          • dryheat
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 10587

            #6
            The real purpose was to increase the black population and thus provide assured democrat election victories for all eternity.
            That's just silly talk.
            There are no positive results from increasing the black population. I don't think there is any reason to increase any population.
            If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

            Comment

            • Vern Humphrey
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 15875

              #7
              Originally posted by Johnny P
              The cornerstone of the Great Society was:

              Ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequity, and improving the environment.
              And if they ran it backward, it might have done that. As it was, poverty -- in decline at the time -- stopped dropping, crime increased, inequality increased (if you don't work, you don't get ahead.) And the Polar Ice Caps will be gone by 2015 (Al Gore told me so, himself.)

              Comment

              • sid
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 3198

                #8
                What GUN SMOKE said was true and I remember it quite well. Johnson told his friends "this will guarantee us the n&*^er" vote for the next 30 years. It was widely reported in Conservative newspapers at the time. Back then we still had Conservative newspapers.

                Comment

                • Gun Smoke
                  Banned
                  • Sep 2019
                  • 1658

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sid
                  What GUN SMOKE said was true and I remember it quite well. Johnson told his friends "this will guarantee us the n&*^er" vote for the next 30 years. It was widely reported in Conservative newspapers at the time. Back then we still had Conservative newspapers.
                  Thanks Sid.

                  Everyone knows how blacks vote on a whole. Providing welfare and PAYING them to reproduce is a no-brainer for guaranteed increased democrat votes.

                  Comment

                  • clintonhater
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 5220

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dryheat
                    I don't think there is any reason to increase any population.
                    Why else do you think liberal fed judges, all radical Dems of course, have made it almost IMPOSSIBLE to limit the flood of Turd Worlders surging across our borders? EVERY exec order or other step taken to control them has been overturned by some fed court. Even if the original invaders can be prevented from voting--legally, that is--their MANY brats will be US citizens, all voting for the party that let their parents in & provided them with financial support.

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Gun Smoke
                      Providing welfare and PAYING them to reproduce is a no-brainer for guaranteed increased democrat votes.
                      Togor & his ilk, speaking from a position of "white privilege," will say "ridiculous, such a little bit of welfare money is no incentive to keep breeding," but to any teenage girl it means INDEPENDANCE from her own family--the money to set up in her apartment, & the money left over is more cash than she's ever had in her life.

                      And if the girl's natural breeding program isn't increasing her benefits rapidly enough, many states include among their Medicaid benefits (which differ from state to state) FERTILITY TREATMENT!!! Can you BELIEVE that a social parasite already supported by welfare would be encouraged by the state gov't to add more burdens on taxpayers? But in Dem controlled states, more "burdens" mean, eventually, more votes for them!

                      Comment

                      • lyman
                        Administrator - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 11266

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Johnny P
                        The cornerstone of the Great Society was:

                        Ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequity, and improving the environment.
                        would like to see the stats on those four metrics, as in compare 1964 to 2020,



                        as to Clintonhaters last post, I watched a young woman use her EBT card for the first time one day when I was in the grocery biz,

                        her mom, and her grandmom where with her, all dressed very well, and it was a celebratory event for them, like getting a drivers license or similar,


                        I found it very odd, you would think a parent and or grandparent would be happier if they did not need the EBT card

                        Comment

                        • clintonhater
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2015
                          • 5220

                          #13
                          Originally posted by lyman
                          as to Clintonhaters last post, I watched a young woman use her EBT card for the first time one day when I was in the grocery biz,

                          her mom, and her grandmom where with her, all dressed very well, and it was a celebratory event for them, like getting a drivers license or similar,


                          I found it very odd, you would think a parent and or grandparent would be happier if they did not need the EBT card
                          FAR from odd when the "family tradition" going back 3 or 4 generations is life on welfare; the teenage girl has learned from her own mother, who learned from her mother, how the system works.

                          Comment

                          Working...