So This Is Interesting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #1

    So This Is Interesting



    A Federal judge in PA orders the GOP and Trump campaign to produce evidence to back up their claims of voter fraud. Thus far, the article states, they have been unwilling to do this.

    Wait for it: "this is just like Garand stocks! If you tell the fakers what they did wrong, then they make better fakes!"

    Um, no. This is a court of law, not an hobby. Rules of evidence apply.
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #2
    Originally posted by togor
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/polit...nia/index.html

    A Federal judge in PA orders the GOP and Trump campaign to produce evidence to back up their claims of voter fraud. Thus far, the article states, they have been unwilling to do this.

    Wait for it: "this is just like Garand stocks! If you tell the fakers what they did wrong, then they make better fakes!"

    Um, no. This is a court of law, not an hobby. Rules of evidence apply.
    Bull Sh!˜t! The GOP doesn't have to proove anything. That's the jobs of prosecutors... except there ain't any prosecutors for Communist Democrats only Republicans. It is Public Record how the FBI lied, broke countless laws, and have never had to prove their innocence. There are THOUSANDS of absolutely corrupt people (you for an example) who lie, agitate, slander, libel, and break laws everyday that if any other us did that we would be in a dungeon. Obama, Biden, Hillary, Schumer, Peelosi, Comey, Crapper, etc, should all be on a chain gang making little rocks out of bigger ones. Justice is now only blind in her left eye. Enjoy your time in Florence CO after the Marxists lose not only the Presidency but both houses of Congress.
    Last edited by RED; 08-13-2020, 02:24.

    Comment

    • Gun Smoke
      Banned
      • Sep 2019
      • 1658

      #3
      Just like the democrats that copy names from tombstones and vote. You can prove it is being done but not by whom personally.

      People should vote by SS number with picture ID.

      No one should have more than one SS number.

      Absentee voting should be done in advance and votes counted at the same time as ballot votes.

      Illegals should not have SS numbers/accounts.

      Crimals should lose their right to vote until their sentence ends.

      It doesn't seem so hard to me to prevent voter fraud, however, the democrats fight against all the above solutions.

      Comment

      • Roadkingtrax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 7835

        #4
        Originally posted by RED
        Bull Sh!˜t! The GOP doesn't have to proove anything. That's the jobs of prosecutors... except there ain't any prosecutors for Communist Democrats only Republicans. It is Public Record how the FBI lied, broke countless laws, and have never had to prove their innocence. There are THOUSANDS of absolutely corrupt people (you for an example) who lie, agitate, slander, libel, and break laws everyday that if any other us did that we would be in a dungeon. Obama, Biden, Hillary, Schumer, Peelosi, Comey, Crapper, etc, should all be on a chain gang making little rocks out of bigger ones. Justice is now only blind in her left eye. Enjoy your time in Florence CO after the Marxists lose not only the Presidency but both houses of Congress.
        Whiskey night?
        "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          Red this isn't a prosecution. It's a civil case, and showing cause in civil cases is a thing. The GOP is petitioning the court for redress of some kind in Pennsylvania. Asking them to present evidence to the court is entirely proper.

          If someone wants to get that restraining order against you, they should have to show some evidence to a judge, right?

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...n-voting-fraud

            The plot thickens....it's a Trump-appointed judge who has asked for the evidence



            Apparently a pro-business judge, which is to say he may not resonate with the cultural aspirations of the base to keep power no matter what.

            Ranjan....Indian name, maybe privately stoked to see Kamala Harris in the VP spot?

            He asked for the evidence to be submitted today. Stay tuned.

            Comment

            Working...