More than 100 BLM protesters shut down George Washington Bridge

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #1

    More than 100 BLM protesters shut down George Washington Bridge

    Same old crap...

    More than 100 BLM protesters shut down George Washington Bridge in Manhattan and then violently clash with NYPD outside their precinct on another chaotic night in NYC

    We did that for our Sisters and Brothers who had their lives stolen by AmeriKKKa.'

    Around 100 BLM activists blocked the George Washington Bridge which connects New Jersey and Manhattan
    Protests were called by Hawk Newsome, leader of the Greater New York chapter of BLM
    The group then moved on to the 34th Precinct, having met up with another group of demonstrators
    Police and protesters scuffled and at least six people were arrested

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Manhattan.html
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    The GW bridge opened in 1931.

    My mother's stepfather told a story about how he and my mother's father (they were good friends before the war) took a road trip to NYC, got a little lubricated, pulled over to sleep it off. In the early morning hours, cop rapped in the glass....traffic would be coming soon, best get a move on! Unbeknownst to them they had pulled over on the GW bridge! God only knows how they would handle it these days.

    Protests Ray are about drawing attention. It's taking a risk to block traffic.

    Comment

    • rayg
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 7444

      #3
      Originally posted by togor

      Protests Ray are about drawing attention. It's taking a risk to block traffic.
      Also against the law by preventing the peoples use to use the bridge.

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #4
        Originally posted by togor
        It's taking a risk to block traffic.
        WHAT RISK? 6 out of 100+ were arrested, who were immediately released--no bail in NY! Charges against them will CERTAINLY be dropped.

        Meanwhile, people who can afford to move outside the city is doing so as fast as they can get a moving van, which requires putting your name on a long waiting list. Who will be paying taxes in NYC when only the jobless rabble & social parasites are left? Will the foreign tourists who used to flock there come to see BLM riots & vandalized store fronts?

        Comment

        • clintonhater
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 5220

          #5
          Originally posted by rayg
          Also against the law by preventing the peoples use to use the bridge.
          That's like saying it's against the law to destroy or vandalize public monuments--no, not at all if you've got BLM immunity! That's an example of the "equality" they demand.

          Comment

          • S.A. Boggs
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 8568

            #6
            Originally posted by togor
            The GW bridge opened in 1931.

            My mother's stepfather told a story about how he and my mother's father (they were good friends before the war) took a road trip to NYC, got a little lubricated, pulled over to sleep it off. In the early morning hours, cop rapped in the glass....traffic would be coming soon, best get a move on! Unbeknownst to them they had pulled over on the GW bridge! God only knows how they would handle it these days.

            Protests Ray are about drawing attention. It's taking a risk to block traffic.
            Togey, tell one and all which one of YOUR ancestors are pictured in the painting of Washington crossing the Delaware? You have such a fascinating ability to expound on just about any ideation.
            Sam

            Comment

            • rayg
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 7444

              #7
              Togie blocking traffic is against the law....period!

              Comment

              • Roadkingtrax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 7835

                #8
                Originally posted by rayg
                Togie blocking traffic is against the law....period!
                Chris Christie's NJ administration knows about that.
                "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                Comment

                • Gun Smoke
                  Banned
                  • Sep 2019
                  • 1658

                  #9
                  The risk should be dodging bullets and cars that don't yield.

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Gun Smoke
                    The risk should be dodging bullets and cars that don't yield.
                    Not that you're endorsing criminality or anyth...oh wait you are. You need a T-shirt: Hillary Was Right About Me

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #11
                      Originally posted by togor
                      Not that you're endorsing criminality or anyth...oh wait you are.
                      YOU are the one who's been endorsing criminality ever since the BLM riots began! Or rather, long before, such as the criminality of the wetback invasion. Restoring law & order by whatever means necessary (esp. when cops have been ordered not to do their duty) is the public's right. More martyrs such as the Charlottesville driver would bring this turmoil to an end. (But let's hope the next martyr uses a cement truck).

                      Comment

                      • Gun Smoke
                        Banned
                        • Sep 2019
                        • 1658

                        #12
                        All democrats endorse some type of criminality ranging all the way from obstruction of justice, rioting, murder, and lawlessness to simpler crimes like abortion.

                        It has become "us" vs "them".

                        It's past time to spray bullets, water, tear gas, napalm or whatever is required to take our country back. Those that oppose should be considered to be in the line of fire.

                        Cities/buildings, etc that have been burned and damaged should not be repaired to remind everyone of what a democrat is good for as if places like Detroit aren't already proof enough.

                        Comment

                        • S.A. Boggs
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 8568

                          #13
                          Originally posted by clintonhater
                          YOU are the one who's been endorsing criminality ever since the BLM riots began! Or rather, long before, such as the criminality of the wetback invasion. Restoring law & order by whatever means necessary (esp. when cops have been ordered not to do their duty) is the public's right. More martyrs such as the Charlottesville driver would bring this turmoil to an end. (But let's hope the next martyr uses a cement truck).
                          Why should Togey not endorse what Togey does?
                          Sam
                          Last edited by S.A. Boggs; 09-14-2020, 07:57.

                          Comment

                          Working...