Biden said voters 'don't deserve' to know his opinion on court packing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #1

    Biden said voters 'don't deserve' to know his opinion on court packing

    You peons! you don't deserve to know!... just vote for me and after I win I will tell you! ...Lol...

    Don't the voters deserve to know where you stand on -' DiMattei started, but was cut off by Biden mid-question. 'No, they don't deserve,' Biden said, before he appeared to shift attention to President Trump and his administration.
    Joe Biden says voters 'don't deserve' to know his position on packing the Supreme Court with additional justices before the election as he refuses to answer questions on the subject

    Biden made the remark during a campaign stop on Friday in Las Vegas, Nevada
    He's previously refused to answer the question, saying it would create headlines and take attention from Trump's attempt to approve Amy Coney Barrett
    Amy Coney Barrett was nominated soon after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September

    Some Democrats have voiced support for court packing after her nomination
    Meanwhile Biden on Saturday said he will 'not, not, not ban fracking'

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eme-Court.html
    Last edited by rayg; 10-11-2020, 02:52.
  • Major Tom
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 6181

    #2
    Electing Biden to just to know where he stands on important issues is like buying a house and not ever doing a walk thru OR knowing how much it will cost.

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      We already know the Republican opinion on court packing....they're in favor of it.

      Comment

      • Vern Humphrey
        Administrator - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 15875

        #4
        Insufferable arrogance is a Democrat trait.

        Comment

        • lyman
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11268

          #5
          Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
          Insufferable arrogance is a Democrat trait.
          yup

          Comment

          • S.A. Boggs
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 8568

            #6
            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
            Insufferable arrogance is a Democrat trait.
            Which does the average Democrat favor most...stupidity or arrogance?
            Sam

            Comment

            • jgaynor
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 1287

              #7
              Trump said voters don't deserve to see his income tax returns......or trump virus test results.....and on and on

              Comment

              • Vern Humphrey
                Administrator - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 15875

                #8
                Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                Which does the average Democrat favor most...stupidity or arrogance?
                Sam
                Arrogance in themselves, ignorance in the voters.

                Comment

                • S.A. Boggs
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 8568

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jgaynor
                  Trump said voters don't deserve to see his income tax returns......or trump virus test results.....and on and on
                  Trump is a businessman and will return to being this. I can understand his not wanting to release this information as this only empowers those who he has to deal with. Why show your weakness?
                  Sam

                  Comment

                  • Vern Humphrey
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 15875

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jgaynor
                    Trump said voters don't deserve to see his income tax returns......or trump virus test results.....and on and on
                    Let me point out that the privacy of tax returns is protected by law -- and by the Constitution.

                    Article IV
                    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


                    Where is the probable cause?

                    Comment

                    • jgaynor
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 1287

                      #11
                      For the position of President of the United States there are a number of good reasons why the subjects of the president's physical, mental and financial health are reasonable for public scrutiny. Trump fails on all three.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                        Let me point out that the privacy of tax returns is protected by law -- and by the Constitution.

                        Article IV
                        The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


                        Where is the probable cause?
                        Complete BS deflection argument.

                        If he wants to go back to being a private citizen haggling with the tax man he's free to do so.

                        If he wants to be seen as someone capable of upholding the public trust then he'd do well for example to tell us TO WHOM he is on the hook for nearly HALF A BILLION DOLLARS.

                        Vernon's argument is one of those classic cases of knowing there's a huge problem but stubbornly refusing to admit it.
                        Last edited by togor; 10-11-2020, 12:51.

                        Comment

                        • jgaynor
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 1287

                          #13
                          I am content to leave such a search to the State of New York if that is what it takes. Every other candidate in recent memory has volunteered the same information. Only djt has refused to comply. You can a 'businessman' or president - you can't be both.

                          Comment

                          • Roadkingtrax
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 7835

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                            Let me point out that the privacy of tax returns is protected by law -- and by the Constitution.

                            Article IV
                            The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


                            Where is the probable cause?
                            The State of New York has more of a reason than you.
                            "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #15
                              Originally posted by jgaynor
                              I am content to leave such a search to the State of New York if that is what it takes. Every other candidate in recent memory has volunteered the same information. Only djt has refused to comply. You can a 'businessman' or president - you can't be both.
                              Protecting your privacy -- from a witch hunt -- has nothing to do with being a businessman.

                              Comment

                              Working...