Early voting = Easy cheating.

[RED]

So it’s good to vote early or is it? Votes cast on Election Day are counted that day. Votes that are cast early are in the hands of corrupt politicians for days or weeks which gives them time to manipulate, lose, change, or discard votes. If Trump voters in California vote early, they are voting for Kamala for President.

[Roadkingtrax]

Just as long as you have an excuse.

[Gun Smoke]

Again, if there wasn't built in fraud favoring the democrats they would't be for it and the Republicans wouldn't be against it.

If it were a fair system no one would care either way.

[Roadkingtrax]

Again, if there wasn't built in fraud favoring the democrats they would't be for it and the Republicans wouldn't be against it.

If it were a fair system no one would care either way.

How does it favor anyone but the voter? Gerrymandering is common in Blue and Red states.

[clintonhater]

How does it favor anyone but the voter?

Not if his vote is changed by Dem cheats!

[Roadkingtrax]

Not if his vote is changed by Dem cheats!

I thought he was going to win in a landslide?

There is no widespread voter fraud. That has been proven, can you cite something specific?

[togor]

Not if his vote is changed by Dem cheats!

This complaint is always in the unprovable abstract. When people actually take the time to familiarize themselves with their state's voting procedures, they learn that things are actually pretty secure. But boo, no more griping then.

[Gun Smoke]

I thought he was going to win in a landslide?

There is no widespread voter fraud. That has been proven, can you cite something specific?

That has NOT been proven and can't. New sources are listed most every day of fraud.

If actual votes are counted, yes, he will win by a landslide. Fraud can put the numbers anywhere else.

[togor]

Wait...now it's votes are assumed fraudulent unless proven otherwise? That's Stalin/Hitler/Castro/Maduro/Trump thinking.

Wow.

[clintonhater]

This complaint is always in the unprovable abstract.

Unprovable, because (if successfully executed), undetected.

Are you such a brazen liar as to deny that, when it has been uncovered, Dems are predominantly responsible?

[togor]

Unprovable, because (if successfully executed), undetected.

Are you such a brazen liar as to deny that, when it has been uncovered, Dems are predominantly responsible?

I'd need to see whatever facts you have before agreeing with your conclusion.

I do know that the last Federal election to be thrown out was due to fraud on behalf of the GOP candidate in NC, and the fraud was detected.

[Roadkingtrax]

That has NOT been proven and can't. New sources are listed most every day of fraud.

If actual votes are counted, yes, he will win by a landslide. Fraud can put the numbers anywhere else.

He didn't win by a landslide last time. What makes you think he will in 2020?

[RED]

Land slide in the Electoral College is all that matters. It will be. 60-40 land slide this time because multiple millions of the silent majority are stepping forward and voting for the first time ever. Even the millions of illegal non citizens, felons and dead voters won’t be enough for Harris to become President.

[lyman]

Wait...now it's votes are assumed fraudulent unless proven otherwise? That's Stalin/Hitler/Castro/Maduro/Trump thinking.

Wow.

actually, sounds like a democrat,,


how many people have been shunned and ousted due to the media vs the court of law