It's called "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    It's called "Cutting off your nose to spite your face" ...

    Republicans threaten to boycott Georgia run-off election.
    Now isn't that a great way to lose ? Add to that the
    fraudulent voting the democrats have planned and it
    becomes a cinch we'll lose the Senate.

  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    Make up your mind. Either the fix is in or it isn't. Having one ass cheek on each side of the fence isn't a good look for anybody.

    Comment

    • dogtag
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14985

      #3
      You lost me somewhere in there.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        Either the vote is rigged in Georgia, in which case why vote, or it isn't, in which case do vote. Pick one.
        Last edited by togor; 11-27-2020, 07:41.

        Comment

        • Major Tom
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 6181

          #5
          They have called Trump the "illigitiment" President! Now, who is? Biden will never be my president! All he wants is all his old cronies back in office. The queer Barrak O'Bama, Moochell the trans sexual and their 2 adapted kids.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by Major Tom
            They have called Trump the "illigitiment" President! Now, who is? Biden will never be my president! All he wants is all his old cronies back in office. The queer Barrak O'Bama, Moochell the trans sexual and their 2 adapted kids.
            According to Lyman it doesn't work that way, and Good Lord man, follow the advice: don't try to spell if you've been drinking.

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11269

              #7
              Originally posted by togor
              According to Lyman it doesn't work that way, and Good Lord man, follow the advice: don't try to spell if you've been drinking.
              so what did I say?

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                Originally posted by lyman
                so what did I say?
                You have said this, which is as unarguably true today as it will be on 22-January, just for a different guy, assuming things continue to follow their current course:

                Originally posted by Lyman
                He is still your President.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11269

                  #9
                  and if the SC says so and Biden is sworn in, he will be my president,

                  I did not want him to be, and did not vote for him, but like Obama, he will be the president of USA,,



                  that is a comment you and others have a hard time with now,,

                  Comment

                  • Vern Humphrey
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 15875

                    #10
                    Originally posted by lyman
                    and if the SC says so and Biden is sworn in, he will be my president,

                    I did not want him to be, and did not vote for him, but like Obama, he will be the president of USA,,



                    that is a comment you and others have a hard time with now,,
                    I am reminded of the OJ Simpson trial. Liberals on the internet were asking, "Why aren't you Conservatives up in arms?"

                    When we answered, "Because we believe in the Constitution and the jury has spoken" that didn't compute for them.

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                      I am reminded of the OJ Simpson trial. Liberals on the internet were asking, "Why aren't you Conservatives up in arms?"
                      "Up in arms" for what reason? He posed no threat to me or anyone else. If the prosecution botched the case, who's to blame?

                      Hiden poses a TREMENDOUS threat to me personally, so there's no comparison between the two situations.

                      Comment

                      • Roadkingtrax
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 7835

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                        I am reminded of the OJ Simpson trial. Liberals on the internet were asking, "Why aren't you Conservatives up in arms?"

                        When we answered, "Because we believe in the Constitution and the jury has spoken" that didn't compute for them.
                        The internet OJ Simpson arguments of 1995 were epic.
                        "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                        Comment

                        • togor
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 17610

                          #13
                          Originally posted by lyman
                          and if the SC says so and Biden is sworn in, he will be my president,

                          I did not want him to be, and did not vote for him, but like Obama, he will be the president of USA,,



                          that is a comment you and others have a hard time with now,,
                          The SC may well choose the path of the lower courts, and leave it to the voters to decide.

                          This notion that somehow the courts will be the means by which voters are thwarted is a bit sad. A bit like a team going into the championship openly expecting the refs to throw the game for them.

                          Trump is POTUS, and I am within my rights to find fault there just as you and MT can find fault with Biden.

                          Comment

                          • lyman
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 11269

                            #14
                            Originally posted by togor
                            The SC may well choose the path of the lower courts, and leave it to the voters to decide.

                            This notion that somehow the courts will be the means by which voters are thwarted is a bit sad. A bit like a team going into the championship openly expecting the refs to throw the game for them.

                            Trump is POTUS, and I am within my rights to find fault there just as you and MT can find fault with Biden.
                            the courts are the last straw, just like 2000,

                            sad, yes, but expected on both sides (remember Hillz told Biden not to concede),



                            not sure who MT is

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              Major Tom

                              Comment

                              Working...