The Capital incident was just what the left needed

[rayg]

This Capital incident couldn't have been better for the Left as it played right into the hands to help undercut conservatives and their ideas. One might wonder if the left in some and undercover way, didn't help push it! The idiots who did this do not represent the Republican party just as the extreme far left groups do not represent the overall Democrat party.

But this incident has played right into the the hands of the far lefties and the damage to conservatives and the Republican party has been tremendous and it has given the left's leading news agencies and other left private venues like Twitter and face book a lot of ammunition to go after and even so far as to even eliminate Conservative voices and opinions.

This is another example

https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/mailchimp-boots-gun-rights-group/

[togor]

So Ray you more aligned with Trump or Liz Cheney about now? Ben Sasse looking pretty good too, yes? But they call him a RINO because he doesn't back Trump like they say he should.

Do you know how many cops were injured in the protest? Put in the hospital? Normally you're on top of that kind of stat.

The truth is, the idiots DO represent a good chunk of the TRP (Trump Republican Party) right now. In their minds they're the true patriots and those who sat on their rears criticizing are the traitors.

[rayg]

Togor says....So Ray you more aligned with Trump or Liz Cheney about now? Ben Sasse looking pretty good too, yes? But they call him a RINO because he doesn't back Trump like they say he should.

Ray says....Nothing to do with what I posted...

Togor says.. The truth is, the idiots DO represent a good chunk of the TRP (Trump Republican Party) right now.

Ray says......Oh come on.. No more then the far left represents the average Democrat..

[togor]

Ray says...Oh come on..No more then the far left represents the average Democrat..

How about having a go at 2 of the 4 questions I posted? Or heck it's Friday, just one.

[rayg]

Hard to determine what is a question or you just yacking, Lol

[rayg]

This goes along with what I said in my first post..

"One might wonder if the left in some way, didn't help push it!"

BLM activist who told CNN he entered the Capitol simply to document the siege is arrested after video footage reveals he shouted 'it's our house' and 'we got to get this s**t burned'

However, Sullivan has now been arrested after video footage appeared to show him inciting rioters


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Building.html

[togor]

Well....Sullivan is one. But there are 100 others arrested so far who are from Trumpworld.

Worth pointing out that trouble at BLM protests was fomented by non-BLMers who saw an opportunity.

Anyhow....big picture, Ray.

This is a mess that needs to be cleaned up.

Trumpworld made the mess, but if Trumpworld is going to leave it to the RINOs and libs to clean it up, then by the rules of messes, Trumpworld better not complain about how it's done. This country is our collective house, we all gotta live here, and Trumpworld is a terrible roommate.

[rayg]

[QUOTE=togor;608603]Well....Sullivan is one. But there are 100 others arrested so far who are from Trumpworld.

Worth pointing out that trouble at BLM protests was fomented by non-BLM who saw an opportunity.

I thought it began as a result as a BLM protest because of he incident with the kneeing on the neck of Floyd that lead into and an excuse to steal and destroy. Floyd/BLM incident initiated the whole thing as that was the big cause, and was mixed with other protesters of every other cause including thieves and destroyers.

Anyhow....big picture, Ray.

Ray says.. No that was the big picture...

[togor]

So Ray,

In your view, Trumpworld did not make a mess at the US Capitol? Hanging it on BLM/Antifa?

[lyman]

A>

yall need to get a room

B>

didn't someone here say that the bozo's that were Burn Loot Murdering did not represent all the D's out there?


so, would that apply to the R's as well?

[Vern Humphrey]

A>

yall need to get a room

B>

didn't someone here say that the bozo's that were Burn Loot Murdering did not represent all the D's out there?


so, would that apply to the R's as well?

Of course not! All Republicans are BAD! Left wing looters are just misguided little angels.

[togor]

We're keeping it civil.

And the question isn't whether all of MAGAdom was in the Capitol that day. They weren't.

The question, politically speaking, is who made the mess? Also, who is cleaning it up?

[lyman]

We're keeping it civil.

And the question isn't whether all of MAGAdom was in the Capitol that day. They weren't.

The question, politically speaking, is who made the mess? Also, who is cleaning it up?

didn't say you were not civil,,


but yall sound like an old married couple sometimes

[Vern Humphrey]

didn't say you were not civil,,


but yall sound like an old married couple sometimes

I am reminded of an argument between Lady Astor and Winston Churchill:

Lady Astor: "If you were my husband, I'd put arsenic in your coffee!"

Churchill: "If you were my wife, I'd drink it!"

[lyman]

interesting article

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/three-critical-questions-about-capitol-siege-remain-unanswered?fbclid=IwAR3TxvZG-HNANGHhbhmcJrxGMhZU6Ghl_Vrtwta6Mmkx_ByTo7431itbV_k

One thing recent history has taught America is the first storyline of major tragedies or controversies is never the most accurate.

Americans were told by the Bush administration that they were sucker-punched by a surprise attack on 9/11 by terrorists, only to learn the CIA and FBI had significant advance evidence of the plot and its players and failed to connect the dots.

Susan Rice originally told the nation that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was carried out spontaneously by a mob angered by an anti-Muslim video. The attack, it turned out, was pre-planned and carried out by an al-Qaeda-aligned terror group in Libya.

The country was assured Christopher Steele's dossier provided credible evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, when in fact the CIA and FBI knew almost immediately it was uncorroborated and based in part on Russian disinformation.

And now just a week after the heinous and deadly siege of the U.S. Capitol, the final narrative of what actually happened is still being written, revised and unmasked.

Since the weekend, major bombshell revelations already have substantially revised the initial story of a spontaneous mob overrunning an unsuspecting Capitol police force.

The FBI admitted Tuesday it received information ahead of the Jan. 6 tragedy suggesting some participants were planning a "war" on the Capitol, including killing officers and distributing maps of the complex. It alerted Washington D.C. law enforcement through the joint terrorism task force alert system. It also "disrupted" the travel plans of some of the suspected trouble-makers.

"We developed some intelligence that a number of individuals were planning to travel to the D.C. area with intentions to cause violence," Assistant Director Steven M. D'Antuono said. "We immediately shared that information, and action was taken."

The New York Police Department is reported to have given the Capitol Police similar intelligence warnings of impending violence.

The chief federal prosecutor in Washington declared Tuesday he is pursuing conspiracy charges, signaling the attacks on the Capitol involved multiple acts and multiple conspirators working in concert with each other. The prosecutor talked about the planting of carefully constructed IEDs as one such act. In other words, there was pre-planning for some elements of last Wednesday's chaos.

And the official timeline of events constructed by the New York Times through videos shows protesters began breaching the perimeter of the Capitol a full 20 minutes before Trump finished his speech.

This new evidence raises the first compelling question that remains unanswered. How could Trump incite an attack that had already been pre-planned and was in motion before his speech ended?

A senior intelligence official told Just the News he has found no evidence that the president, the White House or the National Security Council was alerted in formal intelligence briefings to the pre-warnings or suspicions of violence the FBI and NYPD have admitted they had.