The next pandemic

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Major Tom
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 6181

    #1

    The next pandemic

    It will hit about 2023, just in time to further more fraudulent voting!
    Fauci has been exposed as a liar and cohort to further covid-19 coverups. He had a blank check of U.S. tax dollars to give to China's Wuhan labs. He is an idiot (when he proposed wearing 3 masks at once)!
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    Hang on there, are you suggesting there was an actual pandemic with a new virus like they were saying? Because last I knew you were leaning towards it all being an overblown hoax, an epidemic of overreaction.

    Comment

    • k arga
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 565

      #3
      It is my understanding that Fauci and another person have the patent on the covid back in the early 2005 or there abouts.
      Then he and the gang make a trip to china just before the crap hit the fan.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        Originally posted by k arga
        It is my understanding that Fauci and another person have the patent on the covid back in the early 2005 or there abouts.
        Then he and the gang make a trip to china just before the crap hit the fan.
        Whoever told you that is smoking something.

        Comment

        • S.A. Boggs
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 8568

          #5
          "Never let a pandemic go to waste!"
          Sam

          Comment

          • Sandpebble
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2017
            • 2196

            #6
            Originally posted by Major Tom
            It will hit about 2023, just in time to further more fraudulent voting!
            Fauci has been exposed as a liar and cohort to further covid-19 coverups. He had a blank check of U.S. tax dollars to give to China's Wuhan labs. He is an idiot (when he proposed wearing 3 masks at once)!
            He is an idiot (when he proposed wearing 3 masks at once)! ... you say

            How do you feel about someone touting the use of Hydroxychloroquine for anything more than malaria with out any scientific backing whatsoever ?

            ... maybe bleach in-gestation would have been more appropriate after all ...

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11269

              #7
              wasn't some uses of hydroxychloroquine proved to work last year?

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                Originally posted by lyman
                wasn't some uses of hydroxychloroquine proved to work last year?
                Well it doesn't jump out for efficacy like the vaccines do, or some of the IV treatments like Regeneron that Trump got. It it was widely dosed, so consequently there's a cottage industry of people going through the data to find reasons to say whatever it is they want to say about hydroxychloroquine.

                The phrasing of your question captures the situation quite nicely in fact.

                Comment

                • Roadkingtrax
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 7835

                  #9
                  Originally posted by lyman
                  wasn't some uses of hydroxychloroquine proved to work last year?
                  Absolutely. It's an effective euthanasia drug.
                  "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                  Comment

                  • Major Tom
                    Very Senior Member - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6181

                    #10
                    I guess some missed my point completely! So they be the ignorant ones? Democrats will make sure a pandemic will be around thru the future elections so that they can mis-use the mail in votes AGAIN!

                    Comment

                    • togor
                      Banned
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 17610

                      #11
                      MT a better way of putting it would be that mail in ballots proved popular with their voters. But remember they're popular in red states also, for the convenience they provide.

                      In reply we're hearing that voting should involve a measure of inconvenience, but even that argument is selectively applied.

                      What would be interesting is if some state with a D governor and R legislature decided to allocate polling places by population. So much shorter lines in the urban areas and much longer drives in the rural areas.

                      Anyways I don't think anyone wants another pandemic.

                      Comment

                      • Sandpebble
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2017
                        • 2196

                        #12
                        Funny thing, down here in Florida I received correspondence from the Republican side two or three times a week for months .... urging me to vote early and vote by mail.

                        Comment

                        Working...