Quantonimo, (sp) Cuba to close down

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Major Tom
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 6181

    #1

    Quantonimo, (sp) Cuba to close down

    Biden is releasing ALL terrorist prisoners at Quantonimo. After allowing Iran access to billions of dollars to build nuclear weapons and ICBMs he is now releasing terrorists with no word on where they will wind up! This piece of sh!t president HAS to be stopped at all costs!
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11268

    #2
    link?

    Comment

    • Major Tom
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 6181

      #3
      Originally posted by lyman
      link?
      It's on the news this morning! That is,
      the democratic media is not saying it right at this moment! Fox news is!

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        Biden has to be stopped at all costs over a garbled new story? That sounds like B(D)S.

        Comment

        • lyman
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11268

          #5



          apparently Biden wants to close it, but it is still open

          Comment

          • Major Tom
            Very Senior Member - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 6181

            #6
            O'Bammy wanted to close it too, remember? There are 39 terrorist prisoners still there. One was released yesterday and went to Morocco! From there he will most likely join his cohorts and plan more acts of terror. Biden IS on the road to release all prisoners! So, who will wind up taking over Gitmo? Oh, the present Cuban dictator cause he needs more prison space!
            And yes Mr. togor, Biden has to be stopped! Impeach him or use the 25 Amendment! Then, concentrate on removing all the other communists traitors aka Pelosi, the squad, Shumer, Feinstein, etc. When an administration is hell bent on destroying our nation, it has to be stopped!

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11268

              #7
              I see in the article were a camp at Gitmo was closed, not Gitmo,

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                I dislike "at all costs" arguments because they invariably become a license for crime. As repellent as Trump is, as clearly dangerous as he was in office, he was not forced from office "at all costs". His term ended and the electors of the states chose another for the next term. The office does not "belong" to anybody.

                Comment

                • Major Tom
                  Very Senior Member - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6181

                  #9
                  The 'office ' does not belong to cheaters either! Biden won by vote fraud! You know it and so do 70 million voters. Heck, even foreign countries saw it (Guatamala).
                  You cannot win an election by hiding out in your basement. You cannot win an election by saying "You have to vote me in to know what I'm planning"!

                  Comment

                  • lyman
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 11268

                    #10
                    Originally posted by togor
                    I dislike "at all costs" arguments because they invariably become a license for crime. As repellent as Trump is, as clearly dangerous as he was in office, he was not forced from office "at all costs". His term ended and the electors of the states chose another for the next term. The office does not "belong" to anybody.
                    the office actually belongs to all of us, we simply choose the occupant,


                    ditto the other Gov't buildings, positions, and employees,

                    Comment

                    • Vern Humphrey
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 15875

                      #11
                      Originally posted by lyman
                      the office actually belongs to all of us, we simply choose the occupant,


                      ditto the other Gov't buildings, positions, and employees,
                      Wouldn't it be wonderful if Government officials agreed with that sentiment?

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        Originally posted by lyman
                        the office actually belongs to all of us, we simply choose the occupant,


                        ditto the other Gov't buildings, positions, and employees,
                        I like the sentiment that the office belongs to all of us,

                        but the manner in which the officeholder is selected is a bit indirect.

                        Popular vote does not decide it.

                        Comment

                        • lyman
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 11268

                          #13
                          Originally posted by togor
                          I like the sentiment that the office belongs to all of us,

                          but the manner in which the officeholder is selected is a bit indirect.

                          Popular vote does not decide it.
                          posting just to be posting or just being obtuse?


                          or just against the electorial college?

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #14
                            Originally posted by lyman
                            posting just to be posting or just being obtuse?


                            or just against the electorial college?
                            Just stating the facts clearly.

                            And the issue of popular vote for President comes up from time to time.

                            Comment

                            • lyman
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 11268

                              #15
                              ah,

                              so I was right

                              Comment

                              Working...