If Roe is overturned will democrats pack the Court ? ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vern Humphrey
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 15875

    #16
    Originally posted by dogtag
    The Filibuster is the main obstacle the democrats face in "packing the Court"
    plus their need for Harris vote. They must be frustrated to the point of exploding.
    I'd pay a dollar to see them do that.

    Comment

    • dogtag
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14985

      #17
      I'd film it and sell copies. I'd be filthy rich within days.

      Comment

      • blackhawknj
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 3754

        #18
        The Democrats expand the Court, then the Republicans /Conservatives win, downsize. Congress has the authority to set the size of the Court, and also to abolish jobs, or not fund them. It would be interesting to see what happens when some liberal justices receive notices that their positions have been abolished, or the money for their salaries will not be appropriated for the coming year.
        I am always amused when pro-abortionists encounter the Unanticipated Consequences and Unexpected Results of Roe, namely the widespread rejection by men of the role of protector and provider. One fairly affluent couple I know, follow the Liberal Line to a T, have 2 of their daughters-both divorced-and 4 grandchildren living with them. The kids have had no contact with their fathers since their parents' divorces-6 and 8 years ago.
        Last edited by blackhawknj; 12-06-2021, 04:30.

        Comment

        • Vern Humphrey
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 15875

          #19
          Originally posted by blackhawknj
          The Democrats expand the Court, then the Republicans /Conservatives win, downsize. Congress has the authority to set the size of the Court, and also to abolish jobs, or not fund them. It would be interesting to see what happens when some liberal justices receive notices that their positions have been abolished, or the money for their salaries will not be appropriated for the coming year.
          I am always amused when pro-abortionists encounter the Unanticipated Consequences and Unexpected Results of Roe, namely the widespread rejection by men of the role of protector and provider. One fairly affluent couple I know, follow the Liberal Line to a T, have 2 of their daughters-both divorced-and 4 grandchildren living with them. The kids have had no contact with their fathers since their parents' divorces-6 and 8 years ago.
          As despicable as it is, you can consider fathers abandoning their children as a male abortion.

          Comment

          • Allen
            Moderator
            • Sep 2009
            • 10625

            #20
            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
            As despicable as it is, you can consider fathers abandoning their children as a male abortion.
            This use to be one of the many things the KKK took care of. No, I'm not saying I support their actions of taking the law into their own hands and they didn't always act appropriately, but they acted when no one else would. They would weed out deadbeat fathers and those who beat their wives/girlfriends regardless of race, and beat the crap out of them (or worse). Agree or disagree with their actions, the problem is much worse now with their actions gone. Written laws are seldom enforced in this area.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
            Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, said one of her goals was to eliminate Blacks.
            This is an overall democrat policy period. You would think that NO black ever would support such a political party. Instead, they are the main supporters. Wave a little welfare or a free obamy phone in front of them and they take the bait.
            Last edited by Allen; 12-06-2021, 06:17.

            Comment

            • Roadkingtrax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 7835

              #21
              Originally posted by Allen
              This use to be one of the many things the KKK took care of. No, I'm not saying I support their actions of taking the law into their own hands and they didn't always act appropriately, but they acted when no one else would. They would weed out deadbeat fathers and those who beat their wives/girlfriends regardless of race, and beat the crap out of them (or worse). Agree or disagree with their actions, the problem is much worse now with their actions gone. Written laws are seldom enforced in this area.

              - - - Updated - - -



              This is an overall democrat policy period. You would think that NO black ever would support such a political party. Instead, they are the main supporters. Wave a little welfare or a free obamy phone in front of them and they take the bait.
              Who wanted to get up for church on Sunday morning, when they stayed up all night burning crosses on the property of deadbeat fathers?

              I'm surprised Allen hasn't praised Hitler for the Autobahn yet.
              "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

              Comment

              • dryheat
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 10587

                #22
                Yup, back when there were men who, 'got things done'.
                If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11294

                  #23
                  lets be sure keep this out the ditches,

                  or the thread will go bye bye

                  Comment

                  Working...