Officer found Not Guilty Of Lying Lost Everything Because of BLM

[rayg]

Ex Police Officer was found Not Guilty Of Lying Lost Everything Because of BLM Protesters

Ex-Police Officer Who Was Found Not Guilty Of Lying Says He?s Lost Everything Because Protesters Terrorized His Family

An ex-police officer who was found not guilty of filing a false report about an arrest he made said he?d lost everything because Black Lives Matter protesters terrorized his family, Fox News reported.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/02/09/m...-lives-matter/

https://www.foxnews.com/media/former-california-police-officer-left-terrorized-family

[RED]

That is a deadly weapon the Socialist love and use often. Honor, respect, truth, morals, and decency is flushed down their toilet and replaced by skulduggery, pretense, thievery, and any other underhanded, criminal act and use it to destroy the US, overthrow elected officials, and turn the world into a Orwellian paradise.

You do not have to look far for the jewel in their crown. That is the totally made up fantastic lie manufactured and financed by the NSD hierarchy that the 2016 Trump campaign was only successful because Trump received help and conspired with his boss Vlad Putin and then peed on Obamas bed.

Every human on earth knew it was an impossible thing but that did not prevent the real conspirators from forwarding the biggest scam in human history.

So this local officer lost his job and everything, else, so did thousands of other hardworking American patriots, including Generals, and other honest, hardworking, Americans that had a job and car insurance.

The NDS don?t give a rats rear about anybody but themselves.

[lyman]

last year when the local officials were doing everything they could to tear down Monument Ave here in RVA, one local resident,
who lived on the corner of Monument where one of the statutes was, left,

she was tired and scared,

seems the peaceful protestors took her flower pots and tossed them thru her windows and taunted them to come outside
Police called, but did not respond,

so she left some armed, young adult family members in the house and vacated for a while,

terrorized by losers in her own front yard, with no recourse,


from the party of diversity and inclusiveness

[togor]

Ray I thought it was interesting that the Fox News article had a photo of a group with signs decrying the death of Amir Locke. As you know, he really lost everything at the hands of the Minneapolis Police in a no-knock raid where he wasn't even the target. Unlike the LEO there's no back pay for him, no reinstatement from the afterlife. I only say these things because the Fox article that you linked brought that incident up.

Cops kill more Americans than BLM does year in, year out. Some people killed there's no alternative, but not all of them. So you tell me what you think the acceptable number is of oops-sorry killings by police for a given year, and I'll tell you if I think BLM has a legitimate bone to pick at that number.

[rayg]

Togor says, Cops kill more Americans than BLM does year in, year out.

Ray says.. How does that relate to BLM!

[RED]

Red says the Russian collusion was a total made up lie, financed and promoted by the NSD.

Togor says it was all true.

[Johnny P]

Aren't accidental and intentional treated differently under the law. Regrettable, but not comparable to BLM hoodlums.

Seems that most are now waking up to the fact that given the occasional wrongful death by a cop, the cops are still very necessary. Occasionally someone is hired as a cop that just doesn't need to be in law enforcement, just like electing Joe Biden as president.

[rayg]

One should always keep in mind that there are many thousands of law enforcement officers in the country and thousands of arrests each day and the percentage of actual bad arrests are hardly countable. But some folks like to focus on one bad arrest and keep making an issue of it. It always made me wonder why! But through the years I found that some that were so anti police had been arrested or had a bad run in with an officer in their past and of course because of it they became anti police!

[Art]

Ray I thought it was interesting that the Fox News article had a photo of a group with signs decrying the death of Amir Locke. As you know, he really lost everything at the hands of the Minneapolis Police in a no-knock raid where he wasn't even the target. Unlike the LEO there's no back pay for him, no reinstatement from the afterlife. I only say these things because the Fox article that you linked brought that incident up.

Cops kill more Americans than BLM does year in, year out. Some people killed there's no alternative, but not all of them. So you tell me what you think the acceptable number is of oops-sorry killings by police for a given year, and I'll tell you if I think BLM has a legitimate bone to pick at that number.

No knock warrants are generally a bad idea and result in some "justifiable" but "unnecessary" killings like Locke's. They've also resulted in some cops going to prison for abusing the process including here in Houston.

But

BLM has been shown to be a bunko scheme with no leadership left, an unadministered pot of remaining money representing a fraction of donations, and the former leaders living high on the hog I don't think its a good example.

Since the police are an organization funded and bonded by the state who statistics are kept on and BLM is (was ?) a Communist Front (read their manifesto if you can find it) dedicated to making trouble for the sake of revolution (at least that was the official party line.) In reality it turned out to be not much more than a lucrative fraud scheme in the end.

The article is from a right wing source but is incontrovertible.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/the-black-lives-matter-scam

[togor]

Togor says, Cops kill more Americans than BLM does year in, year out.

Ray says.. How does that relate to BLM!

BLM protests police killings of blacks, motivated by statistics that show it happens in greater proportion for them.

Are they making too much of it? Maybe. But then Amir Locke comes along, and, maybe not.. Saint Paul PD had a warrant for a homicide suspect. Minneapolis PD said they would only serve the warrant if changed to no-knock. So the warrant is changed and they shoot a guy who had no reason to be shot.

Why was he armed? Because he was a delivery driver in a dangerous neighborhood. Cops crash the door down and before the cobwebs are cleared in his brain he gets shot. I don't think the LEO should be prosecuted. But it shows a bad tactical choice up front in the decision to go no-knock.

One of those rare moments when BLM and law abiding gun owners are asking the exact same questions of the police.

So I'll repeat the question: of the ~1000 people killed by police in the USA every year, what IN YOUR OPINION is a reasonable "Oops-Sorry!" quota? 100? 10?

[lyman]

Red says the Russian collusion was a total made up lie, financed and promoted by the NSD.

Togor says it was all true.

RED is correct

[rayg]

Did any one notice how Togor, via his posts #4 an 10 misdirected or changed my IP away from the intended subject! That is taught/learned via the Democrat committee teachings. Don't fall for it! He should start his own thread if he wants to discuss it!

[Art]

So I'll repeat the question: of the ~1000 people killed by police in the USA every year, what IN YOUR OPINION is a reasonable "Oops-Sorry!" quota? 100? 10?

Obviously the right answer is none. The perfect answer is you wouldn't need any cops because people would behave. BUT:

You are asking to quantify the unquantifiable. When is a cop allowed to deploy deadly force?? General policy says to prevent the death or serious bodlily injury of the officer, officer's partner or an innocent third party. By the way, this is where "qualified immunity" kicks in.

Generally the refusal to drop a weapon and comply with instructions, (firearm anytime, knife or club within 21 feet) justifies the "hammer drop." Very few officers do that on the first command and put themselves at risk (remember my action beats reaction post.) Some departments have directed officers to open the range when faced with advancing knife wielders to minimize the use of force especially in "suicide by cop." cases.

There are cops who immediately after a command to disarm will fire. They will almost always be ruled justified on that even though it might not technically be necessary. Qualified immunity kicks in.

Do not ever dick with a Deputy U.S. Marshall. If he says "drop it" don't debate because he's authorized to send metal down range right then and there is a high chance he will. Marshalls routinely stay stuff like "drop it or I'll shoot you where you stand." He means it ; especially the SOG guys. Marshall's are DOJ but in reality they work for the courts. The Fed Courts generally have their back because they protect the Judges.

There will be fewer shootings when there are fewer armed confrontations with career criminals and plain old nuts who are no longer locked away even though they are proven dangerous under the "equity" rules; after all it's not fair that a violent career criminal or nut job who'se a threat should be locked up when a white boy caught with a couple of lines who has never hurt a fly isn't. Hey, its just not fair, especially if you're "congress critter" Bush, Pressley, or "Cutie Cortez." They will sacrifice you for the guy who clocked that poor Asian lady with the bat because its the cost of "equity."

The very high number of cop ambushes is also aggravating this.

[lyman]

Did any one notice how Togor, via his posts #4 an 10 misdirected or changed my IP away from the intended subject! That is taught/learned via the Democrat committee teachings. Don't fall for it! He should start his own thread if he wants to discuss it!

that is what he does,,
he will edit after you post as well, which is why it is wise to quote him when replying

[Art]

that is what he does,,
he will edit after you post as well, which is why it is wise to quote him when replying

The man's a torpedo.