Is it not a little bit odd..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #1

    Is it not a little bit odd..

    that voter turnout in all of the US Presidential elections since 1932, the voter turnouts has averaged approximately 57 percent. In 2020, in Michigan and other States there were dozens of precincts that had almost 90 percent turnout and In every single one of them the votes were almost 90 percent for Biden.

    Could voter fraud be possible in those precincts? The Democrats will say:

    Not at all! It is because we gerrymandered those areas to only include Democrats.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_electi ons#Turnout_statistics
    Last edited by RED; 04-03-2022, 06:57. Reason: ?????????
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    Some places have high turnout. It is, after all the goal, is it not? To have citizens participate in elections? To make their voices heard?

    The fraud in my opinion is to suggest from turnout alone that something nefarious is going on.

    Comment

    • dogtag
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14985

      #3
      The democrats have turned cheating into a fine art at which they are masters.
      If not for that skill they'd be cleaning out cesspools.

      Comment

      • Major Tom
        Very Senior Member - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 6181

        #4
        Biden said it himself "I cannot guarantee a legitimate election in 2022"! Pelosi said "we are working to make sure no republicans can win in 2022"! Wanna deny that, you leftist idiot?

        Note to moderators: I didn't call anyone a name!

        Comment

        • RED
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11689

          #5
          Any time you have 90 percent agreement among a diverse group of humans, the mathematic probability is close to zero. For those 300 plus precincts to all vote the same way the odds are ridiculously low. In the military it is called the 10 percent rule.
          Last edited by RED; 04-03-2022, 07:04.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by RED
            Any time you have 90 percent agreement among a diverse group of humans, the mathematic probability is close to zero. For those 300 plus precincts to all vote the same way the odds are ridiculously low. In the military it is called the 10 percent rule.
            Unless you're prepared to examine the structure of these districts, and test your summary assumptions, you're just blowing smoke.

            Redlining for example, packing minorities overwhelmingly into certain zip codes because the can't afford to live elsewhere. Or culturally isolated enclaves on the high plains.

            You know darn well what I'm talking about and deliberately back off on the analysis to keep a bogus claim alive. You're a genuinely clever fellow and your sly arguments are entertaining but you do not fool me, someone whose day job involves cutting through BS all the time. Get this--I'm so good at it that it ticks people off sometimes.

            Comment

            • Roadkingtrax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 7835

              #7
              If he's the messiah, surely he can be raised from the dead.
              "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

              Comment

              • rayg
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 7444

                #8
                Togor quit deleting my posts just because you don't like them. I think that a poster should be made aware when any of their posts are deleted and given a reason! And if any thing the above post by RKT should be deleted as being stupid!..
                Last edited by rayg; 04-03-2022, 04:47.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11266

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  Some places have high turnout. It is, after all the goal, is it not? To have citizens participate in elections? To make their voices heard?

                  The fraud in my opinion is to suggest from turnout alone that something nefarious is going on.
                  pft,,

                  think about you comments about knowing numbers etc in the past and re read what he posted,

                  as well as the comments about sniffing out bs,,

                  - - - Updated - - -

                  Originally posted by togor
                  Unless you're prepared to examine the structure of these districts, and test your summary assumptions, you're just blowing smoke.

                  Redlining for example, packing minorities overwhelmingly into certain zip codes because the can't afford to live elsewhere. Or culturally isolated enclaves on the high plains.

                  You know darn well what I'm talking about and deliberately back off on the analysis to keep a bogus claim alive. You're a genuinely clever fellow and your sly arguments are entertaining but you do not fool me, someone whose day job involves cutting through BS all the time. Get this--I'm so good at it that it ticks people off sometimes.
                  or gerrymandering a district so that only one party will get the votes to win???

                  Comment

                  • lyman
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 11266

                    #10
                    Originally posted by rayg
                    Togor quit deleting my posts just because you don't like them. I think that a poster should be made aware when any of their posts are deleted and given a reason! And if any thing the above post by RKT should be deleted as being stupid!..
                    if you think that a post may be deleted,, do a screen shot and if it is,, you have proof,

                    if a moderator deletes it, generally speaking, it cannot be retrieved,
                    I can see deleted posts by person, but none deleted by you or togor

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by RED
                    Any time you have 90 percent agreement among a diverse group of humans, the mathematic probability is close to zero. For those 300 plus precincts to all vote the same way the odds are ridiculously low. In the military it is called the 10 percent rule.
                    ballot harvesting is a thing, and has been demonstrated by Zuckerberg,
                    and it is not against the law, ,


                    when I worked in the hood,, the locals used the churches etc to round up folks, give them some cake and a bit of a social hour while they filled out ballots and then a ride to the pols to vote,

                    happened every election cycle

                    Comment

                    Working...