Democrats are blaming republicans for stopping common sense gun laws! NOT TRUE! It's democrats who shut down voting on republican bills. That's a fact jack! Mean while Pelosi is kissing the Pope's ass in order to get communion!
Blaime the republicans?
Collapse
X
-
I heard where Trump pointed out that this was Evil. And that you can't fight evil if Good disarms.
That tweaks anti-gunners, but so what. There's nothing wrong with putting this in terms of Good v. Evil.
A couple things though. First, we've all heard the saying: "Evil triumphs when Good does nothing." So if people believe that, they are signing up to do something.
Second, Evil only has to score once to win, whereas Good has to prevail everywhere to come out ahead. It has always been that way. So Good can't afford to be stupid in how it goes about it's business. And (this being where the rubber meets the road), Good might start by not making it so damned easy for Evil to get in the game. This kid followed every rule, and was not a criminal until he pulled that trigger. But by then the ball was rolling.
So the question can be asked: why does Good bother with a 4473 that doesn't impede Evil in the slightest? Having agreed to a background check, why not look at one that actually helps Good in the battle with Evil? It seems to me that Good can live with better background checks, where we all know Evil would hate them.Comment
-
You don't vote..
So how will that happen?"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. UllmanComment
-
Stop blaming liberals. This kid grew up in a Rural Texas county that was blood red. The Buffalo shooter expoused a theory that is regularly echoed on the far right. A critic could point to your unwillingness to see any problems on the right as yet another symptom of the larger problem.Comment
-
I'm not sure if I need another drink, or maybe finish the bottle, to understand wtf you are trying to say,I heard where Trump pointed out that this was Evil. And that you can't fight evil if Good disarms.
That tweaks anti-gunners, but so what. There's nothing wrong with putting this in terms of Good v. Evil.
A couple things though. First, we've all heard the saying: "Evil triumphs when Good does nothing." So if people believe that, they are signing up to do something.
Second, Evil only has to score once to win, whereas Good has to prevail everywhere to come out ahead. It has always been that way. So Good can't afford to be stupid in how it goes about it's business. And (this being where the rubber meets the road), Good might start by not making it so damned easy for Evil to get in the game. This kid followed every rule, and was not a criminal until he pulled that trigger. But by then the ball was rolling.
So the question can be asked: why does Good bother with a 4473 that doesn't impede Evil in the slightest? Having agreed to a background check, why not look at one that actually helps Good in the battle with Evil? It seems to me that Good can live with better background checks, where we all know Evil would hate them.
tell the squirrel in your head to take a break
- - - Updated - - -
your inability to see beyond headlines and talking points is more and more evident every day,Stop blaming liberals. This kid grew up in a Rural Texas county that was blood red. The Buffalo shooter expoused a theory that is regularly echoed on the far right. A critic could point to your unwillingness to see any problems on the right as yet another symptom of the larger problem.
have you read nothing about this kid and what has transpired since?
granted the story is ever changing, and will be for a while yet until it is all sorted out,
however the fact that a hispanic (Americans who are Hispanic,,, in an area you call blood red,, seems Art is correct) rural area in Tx had a school shooting, has not much to do with Far Right,
the dipxxxx in NY had a manifesto that went all over the map, he hated everyone, left , right and in the middle,
take the blinders off,,, get some fresh airComment
-
The 18 year old that killed 8 people at the FedEx facility was reported as unstable by his mother, and she had the police confiscate his gun and take him in for psychiatric evaluation. Within days he was released, and the police returned his gun. They simply delayed his rampage.
The demand is to ban the weapon, but do nothing about the mentally deranged. He didn't have an AR-15, but he had a shotgun which was just as fatal.Comment
-
The "other Side" has refrained from using the old "police or military" only argument, what's the point of having so-called "professionals", who, when they are called on to perform, fail miserably. As a cousin likes to say, "The only difference between a professional and an amateur is that a professional gets paid for. Doesn't mean they're any good at it."Comment
-
If poopy can do that with an executive order then he can stop "global warming" with another order.
It's just like him having a magic wand. (The Poopy Fairy)Comment

Comment