David, the statue, and the Mona Lisa painting.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #1

    David, the statue, and the Mona Lisa painting.

    Just wondering. How much more do you think they would be worth if they had full sleeves and neck tattoos added.
  • dryheat
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 10587

    #2
    Michaelangelo had the sense to post his graffiti on something other. We have paper now and sharpies but, that's just for practice. So it's ten yr. old nonsense on your arm. If you have tattoos on your face you should be rounded up for a through mental examination. Short sighted people think everything they draw (or write) it art. If you are really good, you don't have room for it all on your body.
    Last edited by dryheat; 07-24-2022, 10:11.
    If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

    Comment

    • Roadkingtrax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 7835

      #3
      Sounds like Red is mad at his granddaughter for getting tattoos or something.

      Arrgh...rage at society again.
      "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

      Comment

      • dryheat
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 10587

        #4
        Maybe a little disappointed. I would be. Especially if it was Pepi Le Pew on the ankle or something lame. Well, while I'm here-
        Have any of you every actually read one of those long stories someone had on their arm? You should at least ask, it's the nice thing to do. But who reads anymore?
        -Saw where someone had their eyelid pierced. Not recommended by doctors, but I've always thought if you want to break out of the mould, get your liver pierced. Show some guts, so to speak.
        No one knows how cool you are after your sewn up, but you know. Oh, wait. That's not the point.
        Have I seen good tattoos? Yes, I have. And awful. This poor kid has to block this out if she is ever to be able to live with regular people. Or maybe it's a great story around thanksgiving.

        tattoes.jpg
        Last edited by dryheat; 07-24-2022, 10:51.
        If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

        Comment

        • Major Tom
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 6181

          #5
          An example of how wacked out some people are: my brother-in-law showed up at the family Christmas gathering and announced he couldn't afford to buy gifts for anyone. Ten minutes later he proudly showed his new tattoo saying it was a bargain at $500! BTW, he is a full blown welfare receipient!

          Comment

          • lyman
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 11268

            #6
            re statues,

            $10 a head to see Jeff Davis all graffiti'ed up,

            Comment

            • dryheat
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 10587

              #7
              I'd like to dip some graffiti artists in a big bucket of paint. It's art you know.
              If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                IIRC there was a tat thread on jouster2 a few years back. Case was made that they're not by themselves bad. Certainly a lot of people have them. Not my style.
                Last edited by togor; 07-25-2022, 07:27.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11268

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  IIRC there was a tat thread on jouster2 a few years back. Case was made that they're not by themselves bad. Certainly a lot of people have them. Not my style.
                  your body, your choice,, right?

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by lyman
                    your body, your choice,, right?
                    Where all this gets interesting is that association is also voluntary. You don't have to work for the guy who bans face tats among his employees. But if that guy has that rule, he has to have a legit business reason for it--otherwise it's just discrimination.

                    One of the reason religion keeps coming up in litigation these days is that courts let religion be a "safe space" for discrimination. When something like that happens, it becomes an attractive legal strategy. The problem being not religion then but rather the law.

                    Comment

                    • Vern Humphrey
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 15875

                      #11
                      Way back when, Post Exchanges sold a kit with two bottles of paint, one black and one white. They looked just like nail polish bottles, complete with the little brushes.

                      They were used to paint black rectangles inside your boots (near the top) on the inside of your belt (near the buckle) and inside the sweat band of your helmet. When the black paint dried, you used the white paint to letter in all the info on your dogtags. So you had four means of identifying your body -- and knowing your blood type. Some people had the same data tattooed inside the left forearm.

                      Comment

                      • dryheat
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 10587

                        #12
                        Originally posted by togor
                        Where all this gets interesting is that association is also voluntary. You don't have to work for the guy who bans face tats among his employees. But if that guy has that rule, he has to have a legit business reason for it--otherwise it's just discrimination.

                        One of the reason religion keeps coming up in litigation these days is that courts let religion be a "safe space" for discrimination. When something like that happens, it becomes an attractive legal strategy. The problem being not religion then but rather the law.
                        Religion is a very shaky "fourth pillar" of justice. It's last ditch. But when native americans decided that sending a man to the moon was wrong because the moon was "sacred" it loses it's legitimacy.

                        Near me there are about a million acres of beautiful countryside that also is home to probably the biggest source of copper in the world. It's going to become a moonscape unless the indians get their way, you know, because it's sacred. I doubt they will win this one.
                        If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                        Comment

                        Working...