Voting Complaints

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Allen
    Moderator
    • Sep 2009
    • 10583

    #1

    Voting Complaints

    I was going to post this sooner but wanted to actually see if the real ballot was as corrupt as the sample ballot this picture was taken from and it was exactly the same.

    It seems to me every election is full of statewide amendments and referendum's that are as clear as mud having the wording that can be twisted to mean anything a politician desires.

    If I don't fully understand the description or see cloudy wording I always vote NO because I sense they (whoever put this chit on the ballots) are trying to hide something.

    The latest is this: a referendum stating that the county can control your property like a city ordinance controls what you have in your yard if living within an incorporated municipality.

    Some good would come of this but there are no limits. If you have a small pile of scrap behind a shed the county would have the right to issue fines and even confiscate your land (remember, no limits given). No one wants and un-sightly yard and don't store junk in their front yards but most all farms have a scrap or lay-down area where old equipment is kept till a load is built up for hauling off or to use as spare parts. This is what the county refers to as "junk yards" and again no limits are set.

    The referendum listed on the ballot I am speaking of is for non-incorporated areas with NO description given, the hopes being that people will just vote yes for everything w/o knowing or caring what it is for.

    Needless to say a lot of people here are pissed and intend to find WHO put this on our ballots.

    To make a long story short (too late) would you vote "yes" or "no" on an item like this with no description? Sure, it is something that could be researched in advance if known about and given a sample ballot in advance but it shouldn't have to come to this.
    Attached Files
  • Vern Humphrey
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 15875

    #2
    Come to Stone County, Arkansas.

    We had Flood Insurance. To qualify for the Federal Flood Insurance Program, your local government (city or county) has to have a zoning ordnance that meets Federal standards. We had such a zoning ordnance, and the landowners hated it and forced the Quorum Court to repeal it -- and our Flood Insurance went away.

    In 2008, we had TWO 100-year floods, back to back on the White River. Now if you get Flood Insurance up to six months AFTER the flood, it will pay off. So the Quorum Court announced they would pass a new zoning ordnance so everyone could file a claim.

    They got so much pushback from the landowners they decided to put it on the ballot, instead (and missed the 6-month deadline.) When it came to a vote, the people voted it DOWN!

    I love this county!

    Comment

    • Allen
      Moderator
      • Sep 2009
      • 10583

      #3
      Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
      When it came to a vote, the people voted it DOWN!
      If like here it was probably worded as such to where people were skeptical of it instead of being described in simple black and white language.

      Comment

      • Vern Humphrey
        Administrator - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 15875

        #4
        Originally posted by Allen
        If like here it was probably worded as such to where people were skeptical of it instead of being described in simple black and white language.
        That's the standard Democrat tactic -- make it so complex and obscure no one can figure it out, but give it a catchy name.

        Comment

        • dryheat
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 10587

          #5
          And this has what to do with the price of rice in China? Some easy science; don't buy a cheap place in the holler.
          If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

          Comment

          • Allen
            Moderator
            • Sep 2009
            • 10583

            #6
            Originally posted by dryheat
            And this has what to do with the price of rice in China? Some easy science; don't buy a cheap place in the holler.
            ??????

            Comment

            • Vern Humphrey
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 15875

              #7
              Originally posted by Allen
              ??????
              I bought a cheap place in the holler in 1969 -- 160 acres at $50 an acre, a mile north to south and a quarter mile east to west. I built on it in 1999 and I've been offered $2,000 an acre. No sale!

              Comment

              • Allen
                Moderator
                • Sep 2009
                • 10583

                #8
                Where I live the "holler" is more expensive than most incorporated areas and worth it.

                - - - Updated - - -

                Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                I bought a cheap place in the holler in 1969 -- 160 acres at $50 an acre, a mile north to south and a quarter mile east to west. I built on it in 1999 and I've been offered $2,000 an acre. No sale!
                That was incredibly cheap even in 1969.
                Last edited by Allen; 11-08-2022, 05:53.

                Comment

                Working...