I find before and during Garland being in the "hot" seat, Nader, Shifty Shiff and a couple of others used their 5 minutes to defend Garland. At the same time Nader started out listing and challenging what those on the right of the isle were about to state. Nader in particular in his opening statement outlined the expected questions by the right and basically called them political in nature with no established facts.
Nader came well prepared with his list of charges (questions) that would be made by the right and dismissed them all.
What I also observed was that Nader spoke in a controlled manner. Jordon on the other hand spoke more in a confrontational adversary manner. But that seems to be Jordan's way.
Nader came well prepared with his list of charges (questions) that would be made by the right and dismissed them all.
What I also observed was that Nader spoke in a controlled manner. Jordon on the other hand spoke more in a confrontational adversary manner. But that seems to be Jordan's way.

Comment