Letter from the USMC about health concerns

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Griff Murphey
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 3708

    #1

    Letter from the USMC about health concerns

    I just got a letter from the USMC about a health questionnaire they will be sending me. According to this letter from Lt. Gen. Panter, deputy commandant, Installations Logistics, this applies to Marines and Navy men who were stationed at Lejeune and Pendleton. I had heard about carbon tet in the ground water at Lejeune but this is the first time I have heard Pendleton mentioned. Anybody know what they are fishing for?
    Last edited by Griff Murphey; 10-11-2011, 03:19.
  • gwp
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 1088

    #2
    Here are two sides to the story:



    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/05...y-or-cover-up/

    Comment

    • Dan Shapiro
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 5864

      #3
      Simple comparison between two major military installations to see if there is anything the same or different in people's health.

      Now here's where I see the WEIRD part. Given that military families were uprooted every 3-4 years and sent to a new installation, many were stationed at BOTH Lejeune and Pendleton. So do they comprise a 3rd group?
      "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

      Comment

      • Griff Murphey
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 3708

        #4
        This reminds me of the Atomic vets. I had an uncle, LTJG dental officer on USS CUMBERLAND SOUND, control ship for the Bikini nuke shots, died of lung cancer in his early 70s. Our local paper just had an article about a Marine named Tyler, who was in 3-5; they were put 5 miles from ground zero for shot HOOD in. 1955. So far he is ok.... That is the kicker on these deals.

        Comment

        • Griff Murphey
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 3708

          #5
          Got the Survey today, 10-24-11. One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71. In other words, no consideration for anyone in an embassy job or like me in the evacuation in '75 (granted, no boonie time and thereby much reduced risk).

          Comment

          • Dan Shapiro
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 5864

            #6
            "One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71."

            Sounds like an "agent orange" question.
            "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

            Comment

            • Griff Murphey
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 3708

              #7
              No agent orange dispersed after 1971 by the VNAF?I would not bet on it.

              Comment

              • Garden Valley
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 868

                #8
                Originally posted by Griff Murphey
                Got the Survey today, 10-24-11. One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71. In other words, no consideration for anyone in an embassy job or like me in the evacuation in '75 (granted, no boonie time and thereby much reduced risk).
                I would surmise they chose the years 1965-1971 because the first Marine ground combat units entered Vietnam in 1965 and the last of them departed in 1971. The evacuation in 1975 involved a relatively small number of Marines who were "in country" for a very short period of time.

                Comment

                • Griff Murphey
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 3708

                  #9
                  No way am I comparing my relatively minuscule potential exposure to agent orange to someone who lived in it. But should something come up later, I did drink the potentially contaminated water on the ships at Phan Rhang and Vung Tau, which, by the way, was just reprocessed seawater which flowed, ultimately, from in-country.

                  Comment

                  • pccraig
                    Junior Member
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 5

                    #10
                    I haven't opened mine yet

                    Comment

                    Working...