I realize this might not be the most obvious place to post a question about trap guns, but this is where the folks are whose opinions I respect so I thought I'd try it.
My question is this: Are there real, verifiable differences between high end (expensive) and run of the mill (inexpensive) break-action trap guns? Is that $15,000 Snobsworthy Groliosa MK VII actually any more accurate, reliable, or long-lasting than a well made break-action selling for 1/10th the price . . . and if so, why. Likely the $15K gun will be "prettier" - fancy wood, checkering, engraving, etc. - but assuming the same shooter, same ammunition, and same levels of care and maintenance, what are the real, tangible, documented benefits to these high end guns?
My question is this: Are there real, verifiable differences between high end (expensive) and run of the mill (inexpensive) break-action trap guns? Is that $15,000 Snobsworthy Groliosa MK VII actually any more accurate, reliable, or long-lasting than a well made break-action selling for 1/10th the price . . . and if so, why. Likely the $15K gun will be "prettier" - fancy wood, checkering, engraving, etc. - but assuming the same shooter, same ammunition, and same levels of care and maintenance, what are the real, tangible, documented benefits to these high end guns?

Comment