Mounting Unertl on a 1903 Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Former0302
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 22

    #1

    Mounting Unertl on a 1903 Question

    I'm currently in the process of creating a reproduction of a m1903A1 USMC 1941 sniper. I have a 1 1/2'' Unertl target scope in 10X, and am still looking for a 8 X 1 1/4'' target scope (if anyone has one they'd be willing to part with...)

    I know that the 8X 1 1/4'' scope mounting blocks should be 7.2 inches center to center. I'm considering putting the 10X scope on the rifle until I can get a scope compliant with CMP rules so that I can have some fun at the range.

    My questions are:

    1) Are the O and E mounting blocks compatible with the 1 1/2'' scopes?
    2) If mounted at 7.2 inches, would that work for both the 10x and also an 8X (either Leatherwood repro or if/when I can find one an original Unertl)

    Basically, my question is can I have O and E blocks installed on this rifle and have these scopes be interchangeable?

    Thanks in advance,
    Jon
    Last edited by Former0302; 11-07-2012, 05:29.
  • chuckindenver
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3005

    #2
    use the Lyman hight bases, you can use any of the scope you like, careful who you have install it, lately if been fixing that that others have already worked on.
    if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

    Comment

    • Tom06
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 21

      #3
      What is the distance between the screw holes on the receiver?

      Comment

      • Former0302
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 22

        #4
        See the thread spacing discussion below this one

        Comment

        • n64atlas
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 497

          #5
          some Unertls use Posa mount blocks. These are different than the standard Target blocks.
          The are found on later producion scopes.

          Comment

          • chuckindenver
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 3005

            #6
            the new made bases ill work with both styles.
            if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

            Comment

            • jgaynor
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 1287

              #7
              The overall length of the Unertl 1.5" scope is only .5" longer than the 1.25" Combination Target scope used by the USMC. The diameter of the main tube for both scopes is the same @ 3/4" anf the diameter of the ocular cell is the same for both scopes @ 7/8". It wolud seem that the only potential point of interference might be between the objective cell and the handguard. Higher bases, if necessary, should fix that. The 7.2" spacing between the mount centers is to keep the adjustment increments consistent 1/4" Per click. (Assuming the mounts are 1/4" click. Some of the original USMC micrometer mounts had .5" clicks.

              Regards,
              Jim

              Comment

              • Former0302
                Junior Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 22

                #8
                Now a moot point, as I've gotten my hands on an 8X 1 1/4'' target.

                Comment

                • TW56
                  Member
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 99

                  #9
                  I have a set of Steve Earle blocks on a 1903, I have shot both a Unertl 1.25" target scope as well as Unertl 1.5" target scope on my 1903. The "Springfield" blocks allowed enough height for the larger objective lens on the 1.5" Unertl.

                  Congratulations on your 8X 1.25" target scope.

                  Comment

                  • chuckindenver
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 3005

                    #10
                    i use the Lyman hight bases, they let the bolt clear the rear of the scope easier.
                    if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

                    Comment

                    Working...