Accurate 2520 for M1 Garand loads

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • psteinmayer
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 1527

    #1

    Accurate 2520 for M1 Garand loads

    I just picked up a pound of Accurate 2520 to reload my practice rounds for my M1 Garand (30-06) at the "Venders-Row" at Camp Perry during the National Matches this weekend. I was actually looking for IMR4895 or IMR4064 (my preferred powder), but no one has any, and on the advice of another shooter, I purchased the 2520 instead.

    My question is this: Does anyone have experience using 2520 in 30-06 for the M1? I'll be loading with Hornady 150 gr FMJ bullets. I know that Hornady lists this powder in their loading data... but I just want to make sure that I'm consistent with my loads, because I usually shoot M2 Ball ammo in competitions. Being that powders are a rare find these days, I don't want to waste the 2520, but if it's not the best choice for 30-06, then I'll save it for something else!

    I welcome any advice, thanks!
    Paul
    Last edited by psteinmayer; 08-03-2013, 04:17.
    "I was home... What happened? What the Hell Happened?" - MM1 Jacob Holman, USS San Pablo
  • Hefights
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 596

    #2
    Yes its one that is listed in some recommended milspec / match loads, about 51 gr for 150 gr bullets, 47.5 for 168s - but that needs to be verified by manual data & following proper procedures, its hotter than AA load data linked below. Lyman 48th has 48 gr as max for 168 MK.

    Its a ball powder, can be temperature sensitive, some manuals recommend using magnum primers in .30-06. You may find it works great. Its a very good quality powder and meters real well. Here's some Accurate Arms pdf load data, page 42.

    Last edited by Hefights; 08-03-2013, 04:41.

    Comment

    • psteinmayer
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 1527

      #3
      Awesome, thanks. I already use CCI Magnum primers for my 30-40 Krag loads, so I have a ton of them... not a problem. Also, thanks very much for the link to the loading data... That's just what I needed!
      "I was home... What happened? What the Hell Happened?" - MM1 Jacob Holman, USS San Pablo

      Comment

      • kcw
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 1173

        #4
        I've used it for about 20 years now. Commonly bought it by the 8lb. jug. Depending on the lot# I usually load 51.5gr-51.7gr. with the 150 gr. M-2 bullet. Lg rifle primer, brand doesn't seem to matter too much.

        Comment

        • m1ashooter
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 3220

          #5
          Originally posted by kcw
          I've used it for about 20 years now. Commonly bought it by the 8lb. jug. Depending on the lot# I usually load 51.5gr-51.7gr. with the 150 gr. M-2 bullet. Lg rifle primer, brand doesn't seem to matter too much.
          I too have used 2520 for many years. It is my powder of choice because it works great in my M1 and M1A. No need for mag primers, lg primers work.
          Last edited by m1ashooter; 08-04-2013, 12:14.
          To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

          Comment

          • John Kepler
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 3028

            #6
            Originally posted by psteinmayer

            My question is this: Does anyone have experience using 2520 in 30-06 for the M1?

            I welcome any advice, thanks!
            Paul
            Yes, I have experience with 2520 in .30 cals.......ALL OF IT BAD! It meters well.......and that is the end of anything positive I can say about it. In every other aspect, it defines "erratic"! Temperature sensitive, horrendous lot inconsistencies, and simply random velocity variations. It's garbage that simply will not make a precision load

            FWIW, you should have gotten other advise and bought Vihtavuori N140.....I KNOW Champions Choice had it last week. You ever shoot N140......you'll never touch 4895 or 4054 again!

            Comment

            • Hefights
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2009
              • 596

              #7
              If it doesnt work in .30-06, you can get another powder and save it for .223.

              I use AA 2520 in .223 for 69 gr AR 15 loads, and it is an excellent performer there, again and again. I have the consistently excellent groups to prove it. And that includes 95 degree & higher heat index humid weather out on the prairie where there ain't no shade to hide in.

              Comment

              • Maury Krupp
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 824

                #8
                My experience pretty much mirrors John's.

                Pretty big lot to lot variations, especially when I bought bulk from the local reloading shop. I don't have the patience to deal with that anymore.

                Temperature sensitive in heat (95+) and cold (40-). Shots would go way high and primers would blow; shots would drop out the bottom or be hard to light even with a magnum primer. But it's a Ball powder so what else is new?

                For short-range progressively loaded practice blammo or when you don't need 10 or X-ring precision in temperate climes, it's probably no worse than any other Ball powder.

                But for Mid-Range, Long Range, or when points count it's not the powder I'd pick.

                Maury

                Comment

                • Hefights
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 596

                  #9
                  Wow, must be different for .223. I shoot a Bushy DCM and a Rock River 24" heavy bbl & have had 62 gr and 69 gr ammo loaded with different lots of 2520 shot in 30 F through 95 F under very adverse (terrible wind, terrible humidity) conditions out on the plains. No significantl change in POI or group size on 200 & 300 yd targets (other than some wind drift). In fact its so reliable its getting almost boring. I use Wolf SR mag primers.
                  Last edited by Hefights; 08-04-2013, 06:40.

                  Comment

                  • Maury Krupp
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 824

                    #10
                    Well, 200 & 300yd are "short range" that's why the "SR" (Short Range) target is used

                    For that AA2520 is probably just as good (or as bad) as any other Ball powder. Meters great making progressive reloading practical and frankly, just holding the SR 10-ring doesn't ask much of any load.

                    But leave any of them in your stool all day during an AZ summer XTC match and by the time you get to 600yd expect to have problems. For Long Range (800-1000yd) you can simply forget about it

                    The lot to lot variations I saw may have been due to buying in bulk. Could be AA has better consistency in off-the-shelf cannister stuff.

                    Better than no powder at all I guess.

                    Maury

                    Comment

                    • Hefights
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 596

                      #11
                      For long range its a 77 or 80 and RL15 or Varget

                      Comment

                      • John Kepler
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 3028

                        #12
                        What's "long range"? Where Maury and I hang out, "Long Range" is 1000 yds, and you ain't hitting squat with a 77 or 80! 600 yds is "Mid-Range", which is why it's an "MR" Target!

                        Comment

                        • Hefights
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2009
                          • 596

                          #13
                          If you have never shot at 1000 yards, 600 yards is long range regardless of what it says on the target.

                          Comment

                          • John Kepler
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 3028

                            #14
                            And if you have as much as I have......you'll NEVER confuse, let alone attempt to equate "Mid-Range" range with "Long Range"! 600 yds is "Mid-Range", just like it says on the target and in the HP Rule Book!


                            "Knock her down!".......the three happiest words in Long Range shooting!
                            Last edited by John Kepler; 08-09-2013, 06:59.

                            Comment

                            • Maury Krupp
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 824

                              #15
                              Well, even a rulebook pedant like me will acknowledge that there's "long range" and there's "Long Range"

                              It's always slightly amusing to hear folks refer to the 200yd bay at the local range as "long range" but you have to take it all in context.

                              Still, there's nothing magic or mysterious about shooting true "Long Range." Slow Prone is Slow Prone; if the shooter can do it at 100 he can do it at 1000. It usually takes a different load and a little different rifle and it's real easy to get blown off the whole 6x6 by a gust or switch but the front sight, holding, and squeezing are all still the same

                              Try it sometime

                              Maury

                              Comment

                              Working...