New member, Need help with1873 trapdoor carbine

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ccdnh
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2017
    • 11

    #1

    New member, Need help with1873 trapdoor carbine

    Hello to all, I just purchased my first Springfield Trapdoor carbine, stamped 1873, looks more like 1978.
    The serial number is 3803xx, it has a buffington rear sight, marked "R". It was referred to as a 1884 carbine. It does have the three-piece cleaning rod in the butt. I am confused about the 1873 stamp with the high serial number, whether it is a model 1873 or a model 1884, I believe it to be in very good condition.
    Would it be worth the investment of changing the rear sight to the correct sight, which I am not sure what that would be. Any advice would be much appreciated.
  • Dick Hosmer
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 5993

    #2
    1873 blocks, of which they apparently made a gazillion, were used to exhaustion (ca. 1887) as there was NO physical difference. Since the powers that be considered the 1884 sight to be the greatest thing since sliced bread, it was slapped onto everything within their grasp. "Model 1884" when you reflect on it, was kind of a joke - nothing changed at that point except the sight, and it was so different as to be self-evident, needing no label. Don't have my books at hand so cannot check number, but the presence of an "R" sight is never a good sign. If the gun is a proper carbine, what happened to its' "C" sight, I wonder?

    Comment

    • Ccdnh
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2017
      • 11

      #3
      Dick,

      Thank you for the reply, would the Buffington rear sight marked with the "C" be the correct sight?

      Thank you
      Gary

      Comment

      • Fred
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 4977

        #4
        Only if you've bought a carbine and not a cut down rifle. Does it have a sling swivel on the trigger guard?
        Has it got a snap hook bar and ring?
        Last edited by Fred; 06-14-2017, 06:54.

        Comment

        • Dick Hosmer
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 5993

          #5
          Fred is correct - no reason to change sights until you're sure you have the real thing.

          Comment

          • Ccdnh
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2017
            • 11

            #6
            Fred,

            I am sure this is an original carbine, there is no sling swivel on the trigger guard, yes to the bar and ring. This one also has the compartment with tools in the butt stock. I do not see any signs that the forend was tampered with, I will attempt to send some pictures. I just wasn't sure if the Buffinton site was the correct way to go.
            Thank you for any and all advice you can give.
            Gary

            Comment

            • Ccdnh
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2017
              • 11

              #7
              Fred,
              I am attempting to sends some pictures.IMG_0722.JPGIMG_0719.JPGIMG_0720.JPGIMG_0721.JPG

              Comment

              • Ccdnh
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2017
                • 11

                #8
                Fred,
                I am attempting to sends some pictures.IMG_0722.JPGIMG_0719.JPGIMG_0720.JPGIMG_0721.JPG

                Comment

                • Ccdnh
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2017
                  • 11

                  #9
                  IMG_0729.JPGIMG_0728.JPGIMG_0727.JPG

                  Fred,

                  Here are a few more, sorry about the duplicate post.
                  Gary

                  Comment

                  • alfajim
                    Member
                    • Feb 2016
                    • 60

                    #10
                    Gary, very nice looking carbine, pretty. By the serial number you listed 3803xx in the Poyer book it shows it to be built early (1st qtr.) 1887. So the buffington rear sight is correct but not with the R marked leaf. There is a vendor on E Bay with a correct marked carbine leaf for a buy it now of $75 so you could change yours out to make correct and it will make the sighting right also if the front sight blade is still original. Measure the height of the front blade it should be .328 above the surface of the barrel be .090 wide at the top with a small taper on each side to the top and a straight rear edge (third type).
                    I could not see the cartouche on the stock left side it should have a date and some initials in a rectangle box and a circle P on the bottom behind the trigger strap.
                    I recommend getting a copy of the Poyer 5th edition book has all the good info on the trapdoor and if you are going to shoot it for sure get a copy of Spence and Pat Wolfs book Loading Cartridges for the Original 45-70 Springfield rifle and Carbine.
                    It has all the loading data reloading dies and tools, ballistics, and how to use the sights.
                    If again you are reloading the dies, expanders, powder compression plug are available from Track of the Wolf. expanders and compression plug are Spence's design for the 45-70 trapdoor to duplicate the original one. To be used with Lee dies.

                    hope this is helpful

                    Jim
                    Last edited by alfajim; 06-15-2017, 04:40.

                    Comment

                    • Ccdnh
                      Junior Member
                      • Jun 2017
                      • 11

                      #11
                      Jim,
                      Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. The carbine leaf on EBay, is that the Sight Ladder (73-23G) with the
                      "C" marking? I measured the front sight, the top of the bottom base is .230, the top of the insert, the highest part of the front sight is .380, the top blade is .042 wide, I will attach a picture of the front sight and the only other markings on the stock behind the lower tang. I will make an investment in both books, I do some reloading but not for the 45-70, might as well do it right.
                      Thanks again, much appreciated
                      GaryIMG_0734.JPGIMG_0733.JPG

                      Comment

                      • Fred
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 4977

                        #12
                        Looks like a Neat Carbine. Field replacement stock? Looks sharp! Got pictures of the left side cartouche stamp and the forarm's underside?

                        Comment

                        • Ccdnh
                          Junior Member
                          • Jun 2017
                          • 11

                          #13
                          Fred,
                          Please excuse my ignorance, but what do you mean by "field replacement stock", there is no cartouche and here is a few more pics,
                          Thanks Again for the reply
                          GaryIMG_0741.JPGIMG_0740.JPGIMG_0739.JPG

                          Comment

                          • alfajim
                            Member
                            • Feb 2016
                            • 60

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ccdnh
                            Jim,
                            Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. The carbine leaf on EBay, is that the Sight Ladder (73-23G) with the
                            "C" marking? I measured the front sight, the top of the bottom base is .230, the top of the insert, the highest part of the front sight is .380, the top blade is .042 wide, I will attach a picture of the front sight and the only other markings on the stock behind the lower tang. I will make an investment in both books, I do some reloading but not for the 45-70, might as well do it right.
                            Thanks again, much appreciated
                            Gary[ATTACH=CONFIG]41216[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]41217[/ATTACH]
                            Gary yeah that is the one it is from Grandpas gun parts. Have bought from them before good to do business with. I would recommend that you get a spare main spring and stirrup both from them as they are new old stock and also get one of the 1879 tools for the best lowest price off the bay. Main springs do break and the pin on the stirrup breaks off mine did. Also a spare extractor the funny shaped pointed piece with the hole and top tang as they break too, mine did way back when makes it hard to remove cartridge have to use ram rod every time.
                            The front site stud is good but the sight blade appears to have been changed it is to tall so might have been done to get zero with the rifle rear. If you change the ladder then just trim down the front to correct height for the carbine rear. As nice as the gun is I highly recommend to get the c marked ladder for best originality and file down front.
                            If you feel you must a main spring vise is a good investment too but the 79 tool is a must to do any repair work on it.

                            Comment

                            • Fred
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 4977

                              #15
                              Gary, when a stock was badly damaged in service, the company armorer would replace the broken stock with a new one. The replacement stocks had no "firing proof" (circled P) under the wrist. They also had no inspectors cartouche (within a box) stamped on the left side of the stock opposite the hammer.
                              Why the carbine has a Rifle's rear sight is a mystery to me.
                              Last edited by Fred; 06-16-2017, 07:07.

                              Comment

                              Working...