general question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • p246
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 2216

    #16

    Comment

    • p246
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 2216

      #17
      These were taken with my tablet. If they dont work let me know and I will get the digital out. Also if you want pic of something else let me know.
      Thanks much.

      Comment

      • p246
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2013
        • 2216

        #18
        Serial number does not show up very well but I found two sources that list it as early 1890. Stock cartouche reads 1889, but it is my understanding this is normal or can be

        Comment

        • Dick Hosmer
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 5993

          #19
          Yes, a number higher than expected for the annual date is explained by the fact that they kept (pre-numbered of course) receiver production around a month or two ahead, and drew parts at random. A number lower than expected for the date needs to be considered much more closely.

          Comment

          • p246
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2013
            • 2216

            #20
            general question pic added

            Thanks Dick l noted the muzzle tip bluing is scuffed up and lighter than rest of bluing. The only thing I can think of is a bayonet being fitted alot.

            Comment

            Working...