Early Trapdoor question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patio
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 36

    #1

    Early Trapdoor question

    Picked one up in the 29XXX range. The bore is ok and shootable. High arch breechblock. Can I shoot the .45-70-500 loads in this rifle?

    Thank you,

    Pat
  • Dick Hosmer
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 5993

    #2
    That's the weakest version of what is not a "strong" action at best. Most people prefer to shoot the later (post-1878) guns with wider receiver and low arch block, and, the 500gr. bullet was not adopted until 1881, well after the changeover.

    If it were me, I'd hang it on the wall - early rifles, especially if in un-rebuilt configuration, are desirable collectibles. I'd go with a later one for shooting - something in the 200-300,000 range, where the selection is wide, and the historical value is low.

    Comment

    • Rick B
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 717

      #3
      Patio, where in Ohio are you? If you do not have another Trapdoor keep your eyes open on Arms list as they have started popping up and all around $500.00 which is great for a nice shooter. Rick B



      Comment

      • older than dirt
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 194

        #4
        Originally posted by Dick Hosmer
        That's the weakest version of what is not a "strong" action at best. Most people prefer to shoot the later (post-1878) guns with wider receiver and low arch block, and, the 500gr. bullet was not adopted until 1881, well after the changeover.

        If it were me, I'd hang it on the wall - early rifles, especially if in un-rebuilt configuration, are desirable collectibles. I'd go with a later one for shooting - something in the 200-300,000 range, where the selection is wide, and the historical value is low.
        Sorry to hi-jack this post but. OK, my TD was made in 1888, so this makes it a wide receiver rifle am I correct? The breach block in it is a high arch 1873 stamped block. Does this mean it has the wrong block in it?

        Comment

        • Dick Hosmer
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 5993

          #5
          Sorry, but yes, your block is not correct.

          Width changed at 96300, and blocks already had the filled arch by that point, even though they were narrow - I'd guess your 1888-made rifle would be something over 400000.

          Comment

          • John Sukey
            Very Senior Member - OFC Deceased
            • Aug 2009
            • 12224

            #6
            I would point out that while the high arched blocks were early, they would not have been changed just because a heavier bullet entered service. I once owned 35 of the rifles (before I got enfielditis)

            Comment

            • Fred
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 4977

              #7
              In my experience, when I hand loaded 500 grain bullets to shoot in my early high arched breechblock 1873, I found that the longer 500 grain bullet would bite into the rifling upon trying to chamber a round and the cartridge wouldn't go far enough into the chamber to close the breech block. I had to file down the contour of each bullet at its front so that they would clear the rifling. These early rifles were designed to shoot the cartridge with the shorter 405 grain bullet that didn't stick out of the case as far as the 500 grain bullets. Also, the sights are calibrated for the 405 grain bullet.
              Last edited by Fred; 09-29-2013, 08:01.

              Comment

              • Dick Hosmer
                Very Senior Member - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 5993

                #8
                Originally posted by John Sukey
                I would point out that while the high arched blocks were early, they would not have been changed just because a heavier bullet entered service. I once owned 35 of the rifles (before I got enfielditis)
                And they weren't - the receiver and block were strengthened WAY before the bullet was changed.

                Comment

                • Rick B
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 717

                  #9
                  One more neat toy for original Poster. Rick B

                  Comment

                  • psteinmayer
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 1527

                    #10
                    Originally posted by older than dirt
                    OK, my TD was made in 1888, so this makes it a wide receiver rifle am I correct? The breach block in it is a high arch 1873 stamped block. Does this mean it has the wrong block in it?
                    My 1873 also has a wide receiver and an early high-arched block. It also has an earlier 50-70 stock and other incorrect components. As it turns out, it's most likely a Bannerman rifle (as identified by Dick Hosmer from pictures and measurements taken). For whatever it's worth...
                    "I was home... What happened? What the Hell Happened?" - MM1 Jacob Holman, USS San Pablo

                    Comment

                    • older than dirt
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 194

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Dick Hosmer
                      Sorry, but yes, your block is not correct.

                      Width changed at 96300, and blocks already had the filled arch by that point, even though they were narrow - I'd guess your 1888-made rifle would be something over 400000.
                      Yes, it`s 410*** range. So with the wide receiver & the high arch narrow block after I`ve put over 500 rounds of 405g Jacketed bullets in front of 34g of RL-7 in the last 2 years, you are suggesting it`s unsafe to shoot because it has the wrong block in it?

                      Comment

                      • Dick Hosmer
                        Very Senior Member - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 5993

                        #12
                        That's not what I said - on two levels. One, I made the general comment (which is true) that the high block in the narrow receiver is the weakest TD, but I did not say it was unsafe to shoot. Two, the fact that your TD has the wrong block in it is a collector issue, not a shooter issue (other than that it is the weaker of the two blocks). Never said it was unsafe.

                        Comment

                        Working...