Reloads

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • carbineone1964
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 75

    #1

    Reloads

    Going to make up some reloads for my Model 1884 45 70 Trapdoor. It is in great Mechanical shape so that will not be a issue.

    I have a pound or so of IMR 3031 here. I am reloading them using a Lee Classic Hand loader. I have plain lead, 400 grain, flat nose bullets to use. They have a crimp groove..

    The dipper that came with the kit is the 3.4 CC and that equates to 44.6 Grains of 3031 according to Lees specs...According to them that would put velocity around 1569. But they do not list a barrel length in those calculations. Mine is a Standard rifle. Not a Carbine.

    I believe that is too much for a original Trapdoor. I called Hodgdon and they said they would suggest 40 grains. I am thinking closer to maybe 35 to 38 grains.

    One other question. Is it necessary to use a filler with the lighter smokeless loads? I use fillers with my older Black Powder stuff with real black, but am unsure if they are needed for smokeless apps

    I know the dipper may not be ideal, but if they did not work or were terribly inaccurate and killed people daily, I assume they would not be making them anymore, as the Lawsuits would abound.


    Well any input from the experts would be great..Thanks
    Last edited by carbineone1964; 10-16-2013, 03:56.
  • older than dirt
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 194

    #2
    No filler needed with SMOKELESS powder.

    Comment

    • Dick Hosmer
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 5993

      #3
      Not in the sense that a filler (or rather no void) is required with BP, but I thought that sometimes with light charges of certain smokeless powders in a big case, that ignition was improved - and better accuracy was obtained - by using an inert filler to keep the powder against the primer?

      Comment

      • Dollar Bill
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 156

        #4
        I don't have my manuals handy but any 400 / 405 gr bullet load listed for Trapdoor Springfield with a listed velocity over 1300 FPS or so raises a flag in my mind. I think you are right in questioning their load recommendation. Your suggested range of 35 to 38 grains is the way to go. Try 10 of each and see what gives decent accuracy. Good luck!

        Comment

        • carbineone1964
          Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 75

          #5
          I even looked on Hodgdons website myself. And they list 45.5 grains of IMR3031 in the Trapdoor section at around 1537 FPS.

          Something seems screwy here. I surely would not think they would list excessive loads on the Hodgdon website..That would seem crazy, especially when dealing with a Antique type Firearm that is over a 100 years old..

          However they do claim only a 17,300 CUP, with that powder load. Which sure seems well within a safe margin for the Trapdoor..

          Comment

          • broom jockey
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 331

            #6
            That Hodgdon's load could be for a modern 45-70? Altho messy, I always load black powder.
            Due to ammo shortages, no warning shot will be fired

            Comment

            • carbineone1964
              Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 75

              #7
              No it is for a listed load for a trapdoor. I even talked to a guy at Hodgdon personally..

              Black is very hard to get around here. Ordering online is ridiculous with the minimums and the outrageous shipping charges.

              I have a couple pounds of Geox, but it is reserved for my Harpers Ferry Musket. Flintlocks are pretty much required to use Black Powder for ignition reasons.. Thanks
              Last edited by carbineone1964; 10-17-2013, 05:16.

              Comment

              • older than dirt
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 194

                #8
                I`m using 34g Reloder "7" behind a Rem 405g 458 dia JSPFN bullet & pushing around 1500 fps. Been doing it for over 3 years & no problems.

                Comment

                • carbineone1964
                  Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 75

                  #9
                  Loaded up 5 with 36 grains. Shot them off a rest at 100 yards. Very hard to see those dang Trapdoor sights with may aging eyes. I think considering my ailing eyesight. The fact that they were shot rather hastily from a crappy rest and was my first attempt at 100 yards. Other times I shot it was just functional checks at a close range.

                  I think it did pretty good. Right at a 4 to 5 inch group. I know I can do better taking my time and such. It was rather brisk out and I hate cold..

                  I was really even glad I hit the paper at all. That was a big concern to start with. All the holes are perfectly round. So definitely no tumblers.

                  So at 100 yards what is a good group size in your opinions? It was pretty cool, hearing that big thump come back at you from the plywood... Thanks
                  Last edited by carbineone1964; 10-21-2013, 04:56.

                  Comment

                  • p246
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 2216

                    #10
                    My 1884 runs 4 inch groups on average with non paper patched 500 grain softies pushed with Pyrodex.

                    Comment

                    • Dick Hosmer
                      Very Senior Member - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 5993

                      #11
                      Under the conditions and circumstances described (all that was lacking were charging Indians!) a 5" group is quite commendable. Given a more favorable ambiance, one might hope to someday reach 3"

                      Comment

                      • carbineone1964
                        Member
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 75

                        #12
                        Thanks. Atleast I am not horrible. That was a 5 shot group by the way.. I have a 1879 Buckhorn type sight on my 84'

                        When the sight is all the way down. It is really, really hard to see. I have not shot to 200 yards yet. But the sight does look a little easier to see at the higher settings.. I have glasses, but it is very hard to get a focus and see everything.

                        What I need is a peep aperture of some kind. I am thinking on a way to do something like that to the rear sight that would not be a permanent modification..Maybe make a aperature to screw in place on the Buckhorn sight with the two little existing screw holes. Or a tang sight of some kind. Some say the Buffingtons are better, but I actually find this 1879 is better for me..

                        Comment

                        • Lee T.
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 212

                          #13
                          I also find the trapdoor sights hard to get a decent and stable sight picture. I usually use just my elbow on the bench while sitting which helps absorb the recoil. Maybe it's the way I'm used to shouldering other rifles, both my trapdoor rifles and one carbine just feel a lot different. With sandbags it's very hard to get low enough on the stock to even align the sights much less get a good sight picture. I prefer 50 yds because bad knees keep my target setting at the shorter distance, and I aim 8-10" low to get on the paper. I don't load this ctg, and at $1.50 a shot I doubt I'll ever shoot them enough to get very comfortable or consistent. But the whomp and thud of these things is so different and fun, who cares about being good?

                          Comment

                          • carbineone1964
                            Member
                            • Jan 2012
                            • 75

                            #14
                            Yes they are expensive rounds. I think I have it figured out at 42 cents a round reloading them. Though I will not shoot 1000s of rounds a year. It is nice to go out and Plink off 20 reloads or so for around 8.00, rather than 35.00 or 40.00 for a Factory box of 20..

                            It does seem like it is going to be a fun Rifle to shoot.. Most times I will not even be shooting from a bench rest. I only do that kind of shooting when I am zeroing in a scope or setting up some sights..Or want to see what a Firearms potential is after removing some of my Human error..
                            Last edited by carbineone1964; 10-22-2013, 06:23.

                            Comment

                            • SgtSki
                              Member
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 74

                              #15
                              I use 12.2gr of trailboss behind the lee 405 hollow bullet without a wad sized to 457 starline brass, and Federal 215 Large rifle magnum primers.
                              Link to result is at

                              Could do better but that takes more practice and a new eyeglass prescription!

                              Comment

                              Working...