SRS check on my latest 1884 Springfield?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dutchtrapdoor
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 8

    #1

    SRS check on my latest 1884 Springfield?

    Hi all,
    I was able to add yet another Springfield 1884 Rifle to my small collection, number 408534.
    Very faint, unreadable cartouche, unfortunately. Any reference in the lists? I'll post some pictures as soon as I have a chance.
    Thanks, Hans
  • dutchtrapdoor
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 8

    #2
    Is there anyone that has access to the SRS database who can help me with above rifle serial number?
    Really would appreciate the help.
    Thanks, Hans

    Comment

    • Dick Hosmer
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 5993

      #3
      Sorry to have not answered sooner. No listing - falls between 408474 and 408613. Statistically speaking, we should get one hit per every 20 queries, but it doesn't seem like they come anywhere near that often. Your cartouche should read SWP/1888. Just so happens - since I'm doing my book photography - that I have one right here from my positive cam rifle 415520. SA made some strange-looking 8s.

      Some feedback please - which photo seems more appealing/informative/useful, etc? Ignore color, of course. I'd originally planned on the larger view, but the tighter shot still gets the point across. I have NO idea how anyone had the patience to produce anything for publication without a word-processor and a digital camera! Thanks.
      Attached Files
      Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 05-22-2014, 08:15.

      Comment

      • Dan Shapiro
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 5864

        #4
        Dick, I like the first one..................
        "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

        Comment

        • Tom Trevor
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 566

          #5
          Yes the first seems better. It makes Al and Bobs book one all the better to think how it was done.

          Comment

          • Dick Hosmer
            Very Senior Member - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 5993

            #6
            Thanks. It takes a lot of time and effort to get decent photos, and I am NOT a pro, at all.

            When I'm done, I will share some pics of my setup, maybe do an article somewhere on the subject. One thing I did find was that the hated curly CFBs are WAY better than the row of 100-watt bulbs I'd used earlier - the string of hot-spots along a barrel are a thing of the past.

            Comment

            • dutchtrapdoor
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2014
              • 8

              #7
              Thanks Dick, really appreciate your effort to find something!
              Cheers,
              Hans

              Comment

              Working...