M84 SRS check plus photos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jones68
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 16

    #1

    M84 SRS check plus photos

    Hello,
    I would like to see if someone could do a SRS check on this Model 1884 with SWP 1889 for me please. Sn# 458077. Thanks in advance.

    20150309_114538.jpg20150309_115632.jpg20150309_114920.jpg20150309_114657.jpg20150309_114215.jpg
  • Dick Hosmer
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 5993

    #2
    A very nice rifle - couple of thousand lower than mine, in similar condition.

    In case you haven't checked values recently, you are looking at somewhere between $2,000 and $2,500 retail to a serious collector. Don't know if you shoot it or not, but I would advise against it, due to possible accidental damage, and just plain wear and tear. Once the fine edge that separates a 95+% rifle from the "almosts" is lost, you cannot get it back. There are many hundreds of fine shooters available at less than $750.

    Rifles from that particular era, which were in storage when the rod-bayonet model was being issued, seldom have an SRS history, since many of them were never issued, but I will look later today, if someone doesn't beat me to it.

    Comment

    • m1903rifle
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 588

      #3
      Not listed. Closest are:

      458061 84R 98 CO H 6th PA Vol Inf
      458101 84R 09/07/98 CO E 10th PA Vol Inf

      Comment

      • jones68
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 16

        #4
        Thanks for your time and information.

        Comment

        • Major Tom
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 6181

          #5
          My M1884 serial number is also a couple thousand higher than yours and is also in pristine condition. I do shoot mine with black powder loads (reloads), but, only about 10 rounds or so per year.

          Comment

          • jones68
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 16

            #6
            I don't think that it is a bad thing to shoot these a few times a year as long as you use lead bullets at lower velocities. I also have a H&R officers model that I shoot regularly. Installed a 1879 rear sight which made a it much better to get on target more consistently. The tang sight in my opinion is only nice to look at , not a great one to look down. Love the history of all the older firearms..if they could only talk! Thanks again to all of you.

            Comment

            • Mark Daiute
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 654

              #7
              I thought I had it's twin here in Maine....498397. Mine is in excellent condition but the case hardening is nowhere as near as that vivid. The color on mine is nice but not like that.

              if Anyone can check 498397 for me, thanks in advance.
              "A man with a tractor and a chain saw has no excuses, nor does he need any"
              Me. "Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" Emerson "Consistency is the darling of those that stack wood or cast bullets" Me.

              Comment

              • Tom Trevor
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 566

                #8
                Sorry 498397 is not listed.

                Comment

                • Tkacook
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 232

                  #9
                  WOW! That is one of the nicest Trapdoor rifles I have ever seen.
                  Never Give Up, Never Surrender!

                  Comment

                  • Sportsdad60
                    Member
                    • Jan 2015
                    • 87

                    #10
                    2nd what Tkacook said!
                    Beautiful piece of history!

                    Comment

                    • Fred
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 4977

                      #11
                      Shazam!

                      Comment

                      Working...