There was a sometimes confusing lineup of high quality zooms from Tamron over the years, with the very first (?) being simply Tamron t-mounts.
Then came the Adapt-amatic line, then the Adapt-all line, and later the Adaptall-2 line.
The lens discussed above is an early adapt-all that is either a CZM, or QZM 85-210 macro f 4.5.
I lean towards mine being a QZM based on it's early double coatings, and number of lenses manufactured.
I have to watch the A/M switch on mine- it under exposes quite heavily in the M position.
It is one of the sharper zooms I've come across with good definition at all focal length positions.
The macro lug engaged results in some usable, if not a bit soft close-up images. It is a lens I'm liking a lot.
I'm at 3 Tamron lenses now- Their first run 500mm f8 mirror, a 70-210mm f 3.5, and the lens listed above.
There is supposed to be a 90mm macro that is well regarded, but I've never seen one.
www.adaptall-2.com
There's a bit of info here.
From the way I read it, the site is incomplete with lens listings still being compiled.
Regards,
Doc Sharptail
Then came the Adapt-amatic line, then the Adapt-all line, and later the Adaptall-2 line.
The lens discussed above is an early adapt-all that is either a CZM, or QZM 85-210 macro f 4.5.
I lean towards mine being a QZM based on it's early double coatings, and number of lenses manufactured.
I have to watch the A/M switch on mine- it under exposes quite heavily in the M position.
It is one of the sharper zooms I've come across with good definition at all focal length positions.
The macro lug engaged results in some usable, if not a bit soft close-up images. It is a lens I'm liking a lot.
I'm at 3 Tamron lenses now- Their first run 500mm f8 mirror, a 70-210mm f 3.5, and the lens listed above.
There is supposed to be a 90mm macro that is well regarded, but I've never seen one.
www.adaptall-2.com
There's a bit of info here.
From the way I read it, the site is incomplete with lens listings still being compiled.
Regards,
Doc Sharptail













Comment